Correlation of mucosal disaccharidase activities with histology in evaluation of rejection following intestinal transplantation.

Following intestinal transplantation, we have found that recovery from severe rejection may be difficult to identify. In this study we sought to ascertain whether concurrent determination of mucosal disaccharidase activities and histologic assessment improves the accuracy of diagnosis of rejection. Histologic changes were graded blindly using a standard set of diagnostic criteria, and these changes were compared over time to maltase, sucrase, lactase, and palatinase activities in four pediatric patients under treatment for severe rejection. The histologic criteria, which included magnitude of enterocyte loss, degree of granulation tissue, severity of villus atrophy, and frequency of apoptosis and cryptitis, were found to correlate with one another over time irrespective of outcome (r = 0.72 to r = 0.85). Enzyme activities were also correlated with each other over time (r = 0.64 to r = 0.80). However, the correlation between histologic diagnosis and enzyme activity was weaker (r = -0.48 to r = -0.57). Furthermore, neither histologic nor enzyme evaluation early in the course of rejection predicted ultimate clinical outcome. The results of this investigation show that determination of mucosal disaccharidase activity provides no additional useful information concerning efficacy of anti-rejection therapy as compared to histologic analysis alone.

Morbidity in patients with posttransplant diabetes mellitus following orthotopic liver transplantation.

It is not well understood whether posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTx) alters postoperative morbidity. This study was designed to evaluate this question. All adult patients who received an OLTx between July 1985 and March 1993 (n = 497) were evaluated by retrospective chart review for evidence of PTDM after OLTx. The patients identified with PTDM (n = 26) were case matched with nondiabetic OLTx recipients based on primary liver disease diagnosis, age, gender, date of first OLTx, and survival. Liver synthetic function, number and severity of rejection episodes, graft survival, total number of hospital days within the first year post-OLTx, renal function, and number and type of infection episodes were analyzed to assess differences in morbidity between the PTDM and control patients after OLTx. Of the 497 adult patients who underwent OLTx, 26 (5.2%) were identified as having PTDM within 1 month of discharge. Factors which identified individuals at higher risk for DM after OLTx included higher pre-OLTx fasting blood glucose (P = .04); lower body mass index after OLTx (P = .02); and cyclosporine rather than OKT3 induction (P = .009). Graft survival, synthetic function, and the total number of rejection episodes during the first year were not different between the two groups. The morbidity variables of total number of days in the hospital during the first 12 months, renal function, and type and number of infections were also similar between the two groups. In summary, 5.2% of adult patients developed DM within 1 month of OLTx. Pre-existing insulin resistance, postoperative stress, and immunosuppression medications all likely contribute to the development of overt hyperglycemia after OLTx. Although PTDM can be a consequence of OLTx, it does not have a significant impact on patient outcome in the first year after OLTx.

Results of liver transplantation in diabetic recipients.

BACKGROUND: The results of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTx) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are not well defined. METHODS: Between 1985 and 1991, 45 adult patients with pretransplantation DM (5 type I, 40 type II) underwent OLTx at our center as identified by retrospective chart review. We compared this diabetic recipient group to a case-control nondiabetic group matched for age, gender, primary liver disease, weight, and timing of OLTx. A total of 30 variables were collected and analyzed with McNemar's test for categorical data, paired t tests for continuous data, and survival and repeated measures analysis for longitudinal data. RESULTS: No differences between diabetic and nondiabetic recipients were noted in patient or graft survival, the incidence or severity of rejection, blood transfusions, operative complications, readmissions, major infections, or number of hospital days after OLTx. However, the incidence of minor bacterial (p = 0.046) and minor fungal (p = 0.035) infections were higher in the DM group. Serum blood urea nitrogen (p = 0.02) and creatinine (p = 0.03) levels were also higher in patients with diabetes versus control patients during the first year after OLTx. CONCLUSIONS: In carefully selected patients with pretransplantation DM, OLTx can be accomplished with results similar to nondiabetic recipients in spite of a higher incidence of minor infections and renal dysfunction.

Cytomegalovirus infection and disease after liver transplantation. An overview.

Cytomegalovirus is the single most important pathogen in clinical transplantation. Although much progress has been made in our understanding of the molecular biology and epidemiology of CMV infection and in our ability to diagnosis and treat CMV disease, it remains a major cause of morbidity but is no longer a major cause of mortality after liver transplantation. Risk factors for CMV disease after liver transplantation include donor and recipient serologic status, the use of antilymphocyte therapy, and retransplantation. CMV disease occurs early after transplantation, and the most frequent site of disease is the hepatic allograft. We have treated 79 patients with intravenous ganciclovir, with ultimate control of disease achieved in 69 patients (87.3%). Preliminary results using intravenous immunoglobulin and oral acyclovir for CMV prophylaxis in high-risk patients have been encouraging. In addition to producing clinical syndromes. CMV may have direct immunologic effects and is a marker of the net state of immunosuppression.

Liver transplantation at the University of Nebraska Medical Center from 1985 to 1992.

Based on our 7 and one-half-year experience with liver transplantation at the University of Nebraska Medical Center: 1. Success and growth of the program has been, in part, the result of close interaction and support of the various specialists involved. 2. We have demonstrated that outstanding patient and graft survival rates can be obtained with cyclosporine/prednisone immunosuppression. 3. Few, if any, technical contraindications exist to liver transplantation. 4. Surgical advances have allowed allografts to be salvaged which would otherwise require replacement. 5. Routine donor-liver biopsy prior to implantation has reduced the rate of primary nonfunction. 6. New strategies to improve survival for patients with hepatitis-B-related liver disease and hepatic malignancies undergoing liver transplantation need to be developed. 7. The management of patients with fulminant hepatic failure is evolving and now includes innovative approaches such as the use of ECLS and auxiliary transplants.

A randomized prospective trial of acyclovir and immune globulin prophylaxis in liver transplant recipients receiving OKT3 therapy.

The use of OKT3 therapy is a major risk factor for opportunistic infections in liver transplant recipients. In the last 2 years, we prospectively randomized 100 patients receiving OKT3 therapy into either a control group (n = 50) or a prophylaxis group (n = 50). Prophylaxis consisted of six doses of intravenous immune globulin over 4 weeks and oral acyclovir for 3 months after OKT3 therapy. The two groups were comparable with respect to demographic, immunologic, and clinical characteristics. The regimen of prophylaxis resulted in (1) a significant reduction in the incidence of herpetic and Epstein-Barr viral infections; (2) no change in the incidence of cytomegalovirus infections; (3) a significant decrease in the incidence of fungal infections; and (4) fewer deaths due to sepsis. The incidence of viral and fungal infections was higher after OKT3 induction than after rescue therapy. Our conclusion is that opportunistic infections are frequent after OKT3 therapy in hepatic allograft recipients. Treatment with intravenous immune globulin and oral acyclovir is safe and effective in preventing non-cytomegaloviral and fungal infections in this setting, thus conferring a survival advantage with fewer deaths due to sepsis.

Clinical spectrum of fungal infections after orthotopic liver transplantation.

During a 50-month period, we identified 91 episodes of fungal infection in 72 liver transplant recipients (23.8%). Candida species accounted for 83.5% of cases. Clinical patterns of fungal infections included disseminated infection (19), peritonitis (17), pneumonitis (15), multiple sites of colonization (13), fungemia (11), and other sites (16). The diagnosis of fungal infection was usually made in the first 2 months (84.7% of cases), at a mean time of 16 days after transplantation. Risk factors for fungal infections included retransplantation, Risk score, intraoperative transfusion requirement, urgent status, Roux limb biliary reconstruction (in adults), steroid dose, bacterial infections and antibiotic therapy, and vascular complications. Fungal infections were successfully treated with amphotericin B in 63 cases (74.1%) but were associated with diminished patient survival (50% vs 83.5%). Fungal infection is a frequent source of early morbidity and can be related to well-defined risk factors, suggesting the need for effective prophylaxis.

Successful prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus disease after primary CMV exposure in liver transplant recipients.

UNLABELLED: During a 38-month period, we studied 320 liver transplants in 283 recipients (202 adults, 81 children). CMV disease was documented in 85 patients (30.0%) The major risk factor for CMV disease was primary CMV exposure (transplanting a seropositive allograft into a seronegative recipient). A total of 42 patients (14.8%) had primary CMV exposure. Twenty-one patients were historical controls, while the next 21 received prophylaxis for CMV infection in a nonrandomized trial of consecutive study groups. The regimen of prophylaxis consisted of intravenous immune globulin (IgG; 0.5 g/kg) at weekly intervals for 6 weeks and acyclovir for 3 months. CMV prophylaxis resulted in a dramatic reduction in the incidence of CMV disease (71.4% vs. 23.8%, (P less than 0.01). All cases of CMV were treated with intravenous ganciclovir (5 mg/kg b.i.d. for 14 days), with 5 patients in the control group developing recurrent CMV disease (33.3% relapse). In the 16 patients receiving prophylaxis who did not develop CMV disease, all developed positive CMV-IgG titers with the passive administration of IgG. However, none developed any evidence of CMV infection or viral shedding as assessed by IgM titers and surveillance viral cultures. Four deaths occurred (all control patients), but none were related to CMV disease. Overall patient and graft survivals after primary CMV exposure were 90.5% and 82.2%, respectively, after a mean follow-up of 14 months. CONCLUSION: Primary CMV exposure is a major risk factor for CMV disease in liver transplant recipients. Intravenous IgG plus acyclovir is safe and effective in preventing CMV infection and disease in this setting. Because of the scarcity of donor organs, we do not advocate protective matching to avoid primary CMV exposure but rather recommend prophylaxis to prevent CMV disease in this high-risk group.

Predictive value of intraoperative liver biopsies of donor organs in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation.

The evaluation of prerevascularization and postrevascularization biopsies in comparison with clinical and laboratory data has revealed a direct correlation between elevated PT and AST levels and pericentral and panlobular individual hepatocyte necrosis. No other significant correlations were determined when comparing selected histologic features to selected clinical laboratory values. In conclusion, these biopsies are of limited use in predicting subsequent allograft function in the absence of prominent individual hepatocyte or pericentral necrosis.

Optimal therapy for patients with biliary atresia: portoenterostomy ("Kasai" procedures) versus primary transplantation.

As the results with liver transplantation have improved, a controversy has arisen regarding the precise role of a portoenterostomy in the treatment of infants with biliary atresia. The controversy centers around three issues: (1) the short- and long-term survival rates achieved with both procedures, (2) the influence of a portoenterostomy on a subsequent transplant, and (3) the shortage of suitable liver donors for very small infants. To address these questions, we retrospectively reviewed the charts of 48 children with biliary atresia who underwent liver transplantation and compared these results with 35 children transplanted for other liver diseases. As a group, the biliary atresia patients had significantly lower mean body weights and ages and spent a significantly longer time on the waiting list. In addition, significantly more of the biliary atresia patients had undergone prior abdominal surgery when compared with the non-biliary atresia group. There was no difference in the intraoperative variables of mean anesthesia time, mean operative time, mean anesthesia preparation time, nor the mean amount of blood transfused intraoperatively between the two groups. However, when the biliary atresia patients who had undergone a portoenterostomy with a stoma were compared with either the biliary atresia patients who did not have a stoma created as part of their portoenterostomy or the non-biliary atresia patients, significant differences were noted in mean total anesthesia time, mean operative time, and the mean amount of blood transfused intraoperatively. The survival rate of the biliary atresia patients was significantly greater than the non-biliary atresia patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Hepatic failure associated with imipramine therapy.

Imipramine, a widely used antidepressant, has rarely been associated with hepatic abnormalities. In the majority of reported cases, hepatic effects have been transient and readily reversible on discontinuation of the drug. We cared for an 11-year-old boy with hepatic failure and massive cell necrosis which followed treatment with imipramine for enuresis. This therapy led to fulminant hepatic failure and subsequent liver transplantation.