RESUMO
Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis is a common cause of vomiting in the first few weeks of life, but in rare cases, it may occur in older subjects with a major risk of delayed diagnosis and complications. We describe the case of a 12-year-and-8-month-old girl who presented to our department for epigastric pain, coffee-ground emesis, and melena, which arose after taking ketoprofen. An abdomen ultrasound showed thickening (1 cm) of the gastric pyloric antrum, while upper-GI endoscopy documented esophagitis and antral gastritis with a non-bleeding pyloric ulcer. During her hospital stay, she had no further episodes of vomiting and was therefore discharged with a diagnosis of "NSAIDs-induced acute upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding". After 14 days, following recurrence of abdominal pain and vomiting, she was hospitalized again. At endoscopy, pyloric sub-stenosis was found, abdominal CT showed thickening of large gastric curvature and pyloric walls, and an Rx barium study documented delayed gastric emptying. On suspicion of idiopathic hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, she underwent Heineke-Mikulicz pyloroplasty with resolution of symptoms and restoration of a regular caliber of the pylorus. Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, although occurring rarely in older children, should be taken into account in the differential diagnosis of recurrent vomiting at any age.
RESUMO
Background: There is limited information available on fast and safe bedside tools that could help clinicians establish whether the pathological process underlying cases of wheezing is due to asthmatic exacerbation, asthmatic bronchitis, or pneumonia. The study's aim was to characterize Lung Ultrasound (LUS) in school-aged children with wheezing and evaluate its use for their follow-up treatment. Materials and methods: We carried out a cross-sectional study involving 68 consecutive outpatients (mean age 9.9 years) with wheezing and suggestive signs of an acute respiratory infection. An expert sonographer, blinded to all subject characteristics, clinical course, and the study pediatrician's diagnosis, performed an LUS after spirometry and before BDT. The severity of acute respiratory symptoms was determined using the Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) score. Results: The LUS was positive in 38.2% (26/68) of patients [12 (46.1%) with multiple B-lines, 24 (92.3%) with consolidation, and 22 (84.6%) with pleural abnormalities]. In patients with pneumonia, asthmatic bronchitis, and asthma, the percentages of those patients with a positive LUS were 100%, 57.7%, and 0%, respectively. Of note, patients with a positive LUS were associated with an increased need for hospital admission (30.8% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.001), administration of oxygen therapy (14.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.009), oral corticosteroids (84.6% vs. 19.0%, p < 0.001), and antibiotics (88.5% vs. 11.9%, p < 0.001); and a higher median value of PRAM score (4.0 (2.0-7.0) vs. 2.0 (1.0-5.0); p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our findings would suggest the use of LUS as a safe and cheap tool used by clinicians to define the diagnosis of school-aged children with wheezing of unknown causes.
