Metabolic control and treatment regimens in patients with type 1 diabetes in Castilla-La Mancha, 10 years later: The 2020 DIACAM1 study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate degree of metabolic control and treatment regimens in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) enrolled in the DIACAM1 study, after 10 years of follow-up under routine clinical practice conditions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,465 patients enrolled in the DIACAM1 study, a multicentre, cross-sectional study conducted in Castilla-La Mancha in 2010, were analysed. Of these patients, 58 (4%) died during the 10-year follow-up period. Anthropometric, clinical, laboratory and treatment data were reviewed for 1,121 (76.5%) patients in active follow-up. RESULTS: Mean glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels were 7.66% lower than in 2010 (p<0.001), 26% of patients achieved HbA1c levels <7%, 24.4% were obese, 51.7% had dyslipidaemia and 33.6% had hypertension. The following were found to be predictive factors for good glycaemic control (HbA1c<7%): good glycaemic control in 2010 (odds ratio [OR] 4.8); the use of intensified insulin regimens, including the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI) guideline and glucose monitoring (OR 2.8); no hyperlipidaemia (OR 1.97); and higher levels of education (OR 1.4). The recommended targets for lipid and blood pressure control were met by 76% of patients; 40% of the patients enrolled required drug treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Glycaemic control in patients with T1DM in Castilla-La Mancha improved after 10 years of follow-up. The use of intensified insulin regimens and technology applied to diabetes care appear to be determining factors in achieving this improvement. Despite the increase in the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, the majority of the patients achieved good lipid and blood pressure control.

Metabolic control and treatment patterns in patients with type 1 diabetes in Castilla-La Mancha: the DIAbetes tipo 1 in Castilla La Mancha study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess glycemic control, the degree of control of cardiovascular risk factors, and treatment schemes used in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in Castilla-La Mancha (Spain). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional, multicenter study on adult patients with T1DM seen at outpatient endocrinology clinics for 12 months (from September 2009 to August 2010). Diabetes duration was > 5 years in all cases. Sociodemographic, clinical, anthropometric, and laboratory variables were collected, as well as treatment data. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess variables independently associated to good glycemic control. RESULTS: A total of 1465 patients (48.5% women) with a mean age of 39.4±13.5 years and a mean diabetes duration of 19.4±10.6 years, were enrolled. Mean glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level was 7.8%, and 26% had HbA1c values ≤7%. Predictors of good glycemic control (HBA1c ≤7%) included intensive insulin treatment [odds ratio (OR): 2.56], non-smoking status (OR: 1.66), and a higher educational level (OR: 1.33). Fifteen percent of patients were obese, 35% had dyslipidemia, 23% were hypertensive, and 26% smoked. Four or more of the recommended control goals were achieved by 68% of patients, but more than 33% required additional drug treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Glycemic control was inadequate in this cohort of T1DM patients. Promotion of healthy attitudes and intensification of insulin treatment may improve glycemic control. Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors is high, although a great proportion of patients achieve good lipid and blood pressure control.