Direct immunofluorescence findings in livedoid vasculopathy: a 10-year study and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) findings in patients with livedoid vasculopathy (LV) may have benefits for disease differentiation when clinical presentations and/or histopathological findings are inconclusive. AIM: To investigate DIF findings in patients with a clinical and histopathological diagnosis of LV. METHODS: DIF findings of 62 patients with LV were analysed, and the published literature in the PubMed database was also reviewed and summarized. RESULTS: This study demonstrated deposition of immunoreactants in blood vessels (BVs) in 59 of the 62 patients (95.2%), and almost all cases were positive for a combination of multiple immunoreactants. Complement C3 and IgM formed the most common combination. The most common pattern was deposition in BVs and at the dermoepidermal junction (DEJ) (59.3%), followed by deposition in BVs alone (40.7%). Immunoreactant deposition in BVs involved superficial BVs with or without deep BVs. The median age of patients with positive DIF findings was significantly higher than that of patients with negative DIF findings for LV (P < 0.03). More recent lesions (present for < 6 months) had a significantly higher percentage of positive results than older lesions (present for ≥ 6 months) (85.2% vs. 14.8%, respectively; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In both the present study and in the published literature, DIF study in patients with LV showed positive immunoreactants ranging from 42.9% to 100%. C3 and IgM were the most common immunoreactants deposited in BVs, while the most common pattern was immunoreactant deposition in BVs and at the DEJ. Older patients and those with more recent lesions (< 6 months) had a significantly higher percentage of positive DIF results for LV than did younger patients and those with older lesions (≥ 6 months).

Physical urticaria: prevalence, type and natural course in a tropical country.

BACKGROUND: Physical urticarias (PU) are an urticarial response to different specific physical stimuli. PU can occur concurrently with chronic spontaneous urticaria or another type of PU. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to study the prevalence, type, clinical data and natural course of each type of PU and other inducible urticarias and also the prognostic factors for remission of patients visiting a tertiary referral hospital. METHOD: We performed a retrospective study of 1200 chronic urticaria patients who visited our Urticaria Clinic during a period of 5 years. RESULTS: Of the 1200 chronic urticaria patients, 86 (7.2%) were diagnosed as PU and other inducible urticarias. The most common type of PU was symptomatic dermographism (n = 35, 40.7%) followed by cold urticaria (n = 20, 23.3%) and delayed pressure urticaria (n = 11, 12.8%), respectively. Twelve patients (13.9%) had associated chronic spontaneous urticaria. None of the cases had multiple types of PU. Erythrocyte sedimentary rate elevation was the most common abnormal laboratory result. Nevertheless, only 4.6% declared a related infection. For each type, the median time after onset before 50% remission showed that cholinergic urticaria took the shortest course (34 months) and delayed pressure urticaria took the longest period (110 months). After 1 year and 5 years from the onset of symptoms, 13% and 50% of PU patients were free of symptoms, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study emphasized the variety of PU, other inducible urticarias and natural courses based on tertiary hospital care. PU and other inducible urticarias have tendency to have a longer course than chronic spontaneous urticaria.

Lesional T-cell subset in leprosy and leprosy reaction.

BACKGROUND: The T-cell-mediated immune response plays an important role in leprosy. The in situ proportion and pattern of distribution of T-cell subsets in leprosy skin lesions have been studied, but no conclusion could be drawn. METHODS: We used monoclonal antibodies for T-helper and T-suppressor surface antigen to define the nature of dermal infiltration in 17 cases of nonreactional leprosy and 20 cases of reactional leprosy. RESULTS: We found T helper admixed with T suppressor in an aggregated pattern in the granulomas of most cases of nonreactional leprosy and in type I reactional leprosy, but a diffuse infiltrate throughout the dermis of type II reactional leprosy. The T-helper/suppressor ratio was 1.68 in tuberculoid and 1.5 in lepromatous cases. The T-helper/ suppressor ratios of borderline tuberculoid (3.11) and type I reactional leprosy (2.54) were not statistically different. The T-helper/suppressor ratio of type II reactional leprosy (5.83) was statistically higher than nonreactional lepromatous cases. CONCLUSIONS: The alteration of the T-helper/suppressor ratio in our study is mainly due to the reduction of T-suppressor cells in the dermal infiltrates, especially in type II reactional leprosy. Further studies of T-suppressor functions may be important in the pathogenesis of leprosy.

Diagnostic value of IgM deposition at the dermo-epidermal junction.

BACKGROUND: Granular immunoglobulin M (IgM) deposits at the dermo-epidermal junction (DEJ) are common in lupus erythematosus (LE); however, weak, interrupted, linear and granular patterns of IgM at the DEJ have been reported in sun-exposed skin in normal adults and in a heterogeneous group of diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 200 patients with positive IgM direct tissue immunofluorescence deposition at the DEJ, alone or in combination with other immunoreactants, in order to determine the diagnostic significant of IgM deposition at the DEJ. RESULTS: IgM deposition at the DEJ, commonly in combination with other immunoreactants, was associated with LE in 57.5% of patients. In cases with IgM deposition alone at the DEJ, only 12% had LE (strong intensities). IgM deposition at the DEJ was associated with other dermatoses in 42.5% of patients. In non-lupus patients, IgM deposition was the sole finding in 59% of cases, and was weaker and more focal than in LE patients. CONCLUSIONS: IgM deposition at the DEJ in patients with LE tends to exhibit a strong intensity and is commonly detected in combination with other immunoreactants. IgM deposition alone at the DEJ, especially of weak intensity or focal in pattern, is noted in non-lupus patients, and has less diagnostic significance.