Anatomical and dose changes of gross tumour volume and parotid glands for head and neck cancer patients during intensity-modulated radiotherapy: effect on the probability of xerostomia incidence.

AIMS: To quantify the changes in dose as well as in the prediction of parotid gland toxicity due to anatomical changes during therapy of head and neck cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with advanced locoregional head and neck cancer, with no evidence of distant metastasis, were enrolled in a prospective study. All patients were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Multiple computed tomography scans were repeated at the end of each treatment week. The original treatment plans were copied to the per-treatment scans to create hybrid plans. The normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) was calculated assuming the end point to be grade ≥3 xerostomia according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group late toxicity scale. RESULTS: The gross tumour volume dose coverage was slightly affected by the anatomical changes, whereas the mean dose (D(mean)) to the parotids changed from 26.1 ± 6.0 to 27.4 ± 7.4 Gy, with a mean increase of 0.22 Gy/treatment week. Consequently, the mean NTCP increased from 0.15 ± 0.06 to 0.18 ± 0.10, primarily due to a few patients exhibiting a marked increase. The absolute gross tumour volume shrinkage and the percentage parotids shrinkage were the best independent predictors for the NTCP variations. CONCLUSIONS: On average, the increase in the parotids D(mean) as well as in NTCP during treatment is limited, and the observed variations were strongly patient-dependent.

Recent advances in the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer.

The majority of breast cancers are actually diagnosed at an early stage. Selection of the best treatment in the adjuvant setting represents a paramount step to reduce the risk of recurrence and cancer-specific mortality. At the present time decision making is based on individualized risk assessment, that takes into account patient and tumor clinical-pathological characteristics. New available tools, such as gene expression profiling, offer the potential to provide accurate prognostic and predictive information, but they require further validation. The present article provides an overview of current strategies in adjuvant breast cancer setting, and addresses a number of unresolved questions related to the role of taxanes, trastuzumab and hormonal treatment.

Single fraction partial breast irradiation in prone position.

The purpose of this work is to introduce a new treatment approach and technique for partial breast irradiation in only one session to patients in prone position by using a dedicated positioning device. The patients were treated on a home-made treatment table top that allows the breast to hang down. A particular immobilization system was introduced in order to assure the reproducibility of patient positioning between the CT acquisition session and the treatment session. The clinical target volume (CTV) was outlined according to surgical clips position and/or tumor location on preoperative mammography. Because of negligible movement due to respiration, only an additional margin of 3 mm was added to obtain the planning target volume (PTV). Based on radiobiological calculations, a dose of 21 Gy was prescribed to PTV. The tumor bed was treated with 3D-CRT technique by using 5 fields and rotating the table while the gantry was approximately 90 or 270 degrees. Thirty patients were enrolled for this study chosen in conformity to an approved clinical protocol. The average percentage of PTV volume enclosed in the 90% and 95% of prescribed dose were 99.9 and 98.6% respectively, while only 3.4% of PTV volume received more than 105% of prescribed dose. Dose to 3% of skin volume was, on average, 15.2 Gy. In 97% of patients, less than 50% of the ipsilateral breast received a dose greater than half the prescribed dose. Mean doses to lungs, heart and contralateral breast were negligible. With a median follow-up of 9 months, no important early toxicity was observed both for skin and breast tissue. The treatment of breast tumor bed in prone position in only one session by using the 3D-CRT is technically feasible and seems to be a promising alternative to other accelerated partial breast irradiation techniques.

A double-blind, vehicle-controlled clinical study to evaluate the efficacy of MAS065D (XClair), a hyaluronic acid-based formulation, in the management of radiation-induced dermatitis.

This study was designed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of MAS065D (Xclair) compared to a vehicle control in the management of radiation dermatitis in patients receiving radiotherapy for breast cancer. Twenty patients were randomized blindly to use the two study substances, three times daily, on separate sections of irradiated skin throughout the duration of radiotherapy and for two weeks afterwards. Patients were monitored before therapy, weekly during therapy, and for 2 weeks after radiotherapy was completed. Skin appearance according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) toxicity criteria, erythema rating, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), skin hydration, patients' view of itch, pain, acceptance, and view of each cream and adverse events, were monitored; at the final visit patients and investigators expressed their preference for one of the creams. MAS065D showed statistically significant superiority in the outcomes of NCI grading for radiation dermatitis and erythema. Patients' and investigators' preferences for one of the study substances were statistically in favor of MAS065D. Very few patients recorded nonzero itch and pain scales, so no significant differences emerged between the two groups. It was concluded that MAS065D can provide an effective option for managing radiation dermatitis although further studies are needed to assess its effect on pain and itch.

Topical butyrate for acute radiation proctitis: randomised, crossover trial.

BACKGROUND: No available therapy has, as yet, proven effective to treat acute radiation proctitis (ARP) following radiation therapy for malignant pelvic disease. We assessed whether sodium butyrate enemas, at a dose of 80 mmol/L (80 mL/24 h), might offer effective treatment for this condition. METHODS: 20 patients presenting with ARP after completing a cycle of 35-52 Gy external-beam radiation therapy for pelvic malignant disease, were treated for 3 weeks with topical sodium butyrate and saline enemas according to a randomised, double-blind, crossover protocol. Clinical, endoscopic, and histological findings were assessed at enrollment, at week 3, and then at the end of the study. Data were analysed by two-tailed t test for paired data (continuous variables) and a logistic-regression model with variable multiple response for ordered categorical data. FINDINGS: Topical butyrate, but not saline, led to remission of symptoms (clinical score from 8.2 [SE 1.6] to 1.5 [0.7] vs 7.9 [1.8] to 8.1 [3.4]). When the treatment regimen was switched, eight out of nine of the previously placebo-treated patients went into remission, whereas three patients relapsed when switched to saline. The advantage of butyrate over placebo, expressed as CI, odds ratio, and p value was significant for almost all the clinical, endoscopic and histological factors taken into consideration. INTERPRETATION: Topical sodium butyrate, unlike other therapeutic regimens used so far, proved effective in the treatment of ARP.

A randomized phase II study comparing sequential versus simultaneous chemo-radiotherapy in patients with unresectable locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: Single-modality radiotherapy is still considered standard treatment for patients with locally advanced unresectable cancer of the head and neck. As treatment outcome is poor, attempts to integrate chemotherapy into the overall management of these patients are ongoing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized study was undertaken to compare a sequential with a simultaneous chemoradiotherapy program. Between February 1986 and February 1991, 93 eligible patients with locally advanced unresectable cancer of the head and neck were stratified by WHO PS, T and N class and primary site and then randomized to receive either three courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin (100 mg/m2 i.v. d 1) and 5-fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2/days 1-5 by continuous i.v. infusion every 3 weeks prior to definitive conventional radiotherapy of 65-70 Gy (sequential treatment), or cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 22, 43 given simultaneously for the duration of the same conventional radiotherapy (simultaneous treatment). RESULTS: At the end of the entire treatment 18 complete responses (47%) in the sequential-treatment arm and 18 (41%) in the simultaneous treatment arm were obtained. No statistically significant differences in the 5-yr progression-free survival, in the median time to loco-regional and distant progression and in the 5-yr overall survival were observed. Leukopenia was more frequent in the simultaneous than in the sequential arm (p = 0.03), whereas alopecia (p = 0.008) and phlebitis (p < 0.0001) were more frequent in the sequential-treatment arm. A better compliance was associated with the concomitant treatment, with 87% of the patients completing the entire radiotherapy program versus 63% of those in the sequential arm (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, the two treatment arms showed similar activity (complete response, progression-free and overall survival rates). Compliance to treatment was better in the concomitant arm. These data suggest that concomitant chemo-radiation therapy might be considered an option in unresectable locally advanced cancer of the head and neck. Phase III studies are needed in order to establish the superiority of this combination of cisplatin and radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone.

Effective control of CMF-related emesis with high-dose dexamethasone: results of a double-blind crossover trial with metoclopramide and placebo.

To establish the antiemetic activity of both dexamethasone (DXM) and metoclopramide (MCP) in patients receiving i.v. cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF), 25 women with stage II breast cancer were entered into this study. A randomized, double-blind, crossover design was employed to evaluate DXM (24 mg in 5 doses) versus MCP (1 mg/kg as a single dose) versus a combination of both drugs (as above) or placebo (PLC). The patients were requested to complete a questionnaire evaluating the antiemetic effect. All but one patient completed the planned antiemetic program during the first four CMF courses. As compared to PLC, both the DXM-MCP combination and DXM alone provided a higher complete antiemetic protection rate (p = 0.01 and p = 0.006, respectively). The DXM regimens were more effective than both PLC (p = 0.004 and p = 0.01) and MCP (p = 0.002 and p = 0.006) in reducing the prevalence of severe vomiting. As compared to MCP, the DXM regimens provided a better control of the nausea (p less than 0.04 and p less than 0.01) and reduced both the episodes and the duration of vomiting (p less than 0.02 and p less than 0.05). The DXM regimens were also associated with a better patient opinion than the PLC (p less than 0.002 and p less than 0.0002). No significant differences were found between MCP and PLC, nor between the DXM regimens. Except for two dystonic reactions, MCP-related toxicity was mild, whereas that induced by DXM was negligible in patients with no contraindications to corticosteroids. As employed in this study, DXM provided safe and effective antiemetic protection for patients receiving adjuvant i.v. CMF. Data available do not support the use of a short-course MCP, either alone or in combination with DXM. The search for better antiemetic treatments is mandatory, especially for patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. To date, we recommend the use of DXM as a standard regimen and as a control for further studies.

Prognostic factors for chemotherapy response and survival using combination chemotherapy as initial treatment of advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer.

Between May 1981 and December 1987, 152 consecutive patients with locally advanced and previously untreated head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) received two or three courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) prior to surgery and/or radiotherapy. Eighteen percent of patients achieved a complete response and 45% a partial response (PR), for an overall response rate of 63%. A variety of pretreatment patient and tumor characteristics were analyzed for both the tumor response to NAC and survival rate. Significantly higher CR rates were found in patients with a World Health Organization (WHO) performance status (PS) of 0 to 1 than in those patients with a PS of 2 (P = .03). Patients with stage III disease were significantly more likely to respond than those with stage IV (P = .006). Evaluation of all parameters through multivariate analysis identifies the tumor classification (P = .001) and the primary site (P = .006) as the most significant in predicting CR. The overall 5-year survival rate of the entire group of patients was 18% (median survival, 14.3 months). Analysis by PS (P = .001), stage (P = .002), and tumor (P = .001), and node (P = .01) classes showed significant differences. Patients achieving a CR after NAC had a significantly improved survival rate as compared with those with residual disease at assessment (P = .0003). With the multistep regression analysis, the tumor (P = .005) and node (P = .007) classifications, and the sex (P = .03) were significant factors, but CR (P = .0004) remained the most important and independent predictive factor. Randomized prospective trials are requested to clearly establish the role of NAC on survival rates.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer.

Between May 1981 and January 1986, 130 consecutive patients with advanced untreated head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with two or three courses of the CABO combination (methotrexate 40 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on days 1 and 15; CDDP 50 mg/m2 IV on day 4; bleomycin 10 mg IV on days 1, 8, and 15; and vincristine 2 mg IV on days 1, 8, and 15 every 3 weeks) prior to surgery and/or radiotherapy. Of the 123 patients evaluable for response to chemotherapy, 19 (15.4%) had a complete remission and 59 (48%) a partial response, yielding a 63.4% overall response rate. Response rate was significantly correlated with the performance status (PS) (P = 0.001), the stage (P = 0.005), and the T class (P = 0.02); 107 patients completed subsequent local treatment (87 with radiotherapy and 20 with surgery +/- radiotherapy). The median survival of the 124 patients evaluable for survival was 14.7 months and the overall survival rate at 3 years was 24%. The median survival and the overall survival at 3 years for the surgical subgroup were 24.7 months and 38% and for the radiotherapy subgroup were 14.3 months and 22%. These results were compared with those obtained in a historical control group of 79 patients treated in our institute with short courses of chemotherapy regimens, which did not include cisplatin, followed by radiotherapy (29 patients) or local treatments alone (26 patients with radiotherapy and 24 patients with surgery +/- radiotherapy) between January 1976 and December 1980. Most of the patient characteristics were evenly distributed (age, sex, and primary sites) except that more advanced lesions were included in the NAC group (Stage IV: 85% versus 62%; T4: 65% versus 42%; N2-3: 48% versus 29%). The overall survival was significantly higher in patients receiving NAC than in the historical control group, comparing both the groups taken as a whole (P less than 0.05) and the surgery +/- radiotherapy (P less than 0.05) and the radiotherapy (P less than 0.02) subgroups. This experience suggests a positive role of NAC on survival. However, this improvement in outcome compared with a historical control group cannot be regarded as definitive evidence for benefit to patients. Randomized studies using active regimens are required to confirm these data.

Alternating regimens in recurrent and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

In the present pilot study, two courses of CF and CABO combination chemotherapy were administered in an alternating manner to 27 patients affected with recurrent and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Of the 23 evaluable patients, 5 complete responses and 5 partial responses were observed; the overall response rate was 43.5%. Two out of five complete responders are still free of disease 30 and 65 weeks after the administration of CR. The toxicity of this program was tolerable and was carried out on an out-patient basis in all cases. The median survival of the entire group was 41 weeks (range 8-98.+). We conclude that these alternating regimens are not likely to produce better responses than other conventional cisplatin-including combinations, but they seem to significantly increase the duration of the response.

Cumulative or delayed nephrotoxicity after cisplatin (DDP) treatment.

The present retrospective study reports data regarding renal toxicity in 115 patients (63 males, 52 females; median age, 56 years) who received cumulative doses of cisplatin (DDP) greater than or equal to 200 mg/m2. DDP was administered alone or in combination at a dose of 50-70 mg/m2 in 91 patients, and at a dose of 100 mg/m2 in 22 patients. Two patients after progression of ovarian carcinoma treated with conventional doses of DDP received 4 and 2 courses, respectively, of high-dose DDP (40 mg/m2 for 5 days) in hypertonic saline. The median number of DDP courses was 6 (range 2-14), and the median cumulative dose was 350 mg/m2 (range, 200-1200). Serum creatinine and urea nitrogen were determined before initiating the treatment and again 13-16 days after each administration. The incidence of azotemia (creatinina levels that exceeded 1.5 mg/dl) was similar before (7.8%) and after (6.1%) DDP doses of 200 mg/m2. Azotemia appears to be related to the association of DDP with other potentially nephrotoxic antineoplastic drugs (methotrexate) more than to the dose per course of DDP. Of 59 patients followed for 2 months or more after discontinuing the DDP treatment, 3 (5.1%) presented creatinine values higher than 1.5 mg/dl. The data deny that the incidence of nephrotoxicity is higher in patients receiving higher cumulative doses of DDP and confirm that increases in serum creatinine levels may occur some time after discontinuation of the drug.

Maintenance of antiemetic effect of a metoclopramide-dexamethasone combination during subsequent cisplatin courses.

In two previous consecutive studies on antiemetic combination of metoclopramide and dexamethasone was found to be very active against nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin (DDP; 50 mg/m2) alone or in combination with other cytotoxic emetogenic drugs. In the present study the activity of the same antiemetic combination has been followed in 18 patients during subsequent DDP courses. Twelve out of 18 patients (67%) had a complete control of the side effect after the first course of chemotherapy. No statistically significant differences were found as regards the intensity of nausea and vomiting, the patients' overall opinions and preference and the emesis duration. In conclusion this antiemetic combination can guarantee a high degree and long-term control of DDP-induced emesis at a dose of 50 mg/m2 given alone or in combination.

Randomized open cross-over trial between metoclopramide (MCP) and dexamethazone (DXM) for the prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting.

Thirty-five patients receiving chemotherapeutic regimens including cisplatin (CDDP) were entered into a randomized open cross-over trial. Sixteen patients had previously received chemotherapy. Metoclopramide (MCP) was given i.v. in 4 doses of 1 mg/kg over a period of 4 1/2 hr, dexamethazone (DXM) was administered i.m. in 4 doses of 8 mg over 24 hr and another 10 mg i.v. just prior to CDDP administration. Sixteen patients who expressed a positive opinion on both previous antiemetics were given placebo (PLC). No significant differences were found between MCP and DXM, considering the mean score of both emesis intensity and patient's opinion. The mean duration of the symptoms was significantly longer with MCP than with DXM (P less than 0.02). Both antiemetic agents were more effective than PLC. No significant side-effects were observed. The results of this study indicate that both MCP and DXM provide a similar protection against CDDP-induced nausea and vomiting.

Improved control of cisplatin-induced emesis with a metoclopramide-dexamethasone combination.

Twenty-four patients receiving combination chemotherapy including cisplatin at a dosage of 50 mg/m2 were entered on this antiemetic randomized open cross-over study. High-dose dexamethasone (DXM) (regimen A) was compared with the combination of DXM and high doses of metoclopramide (MCP) (regimen B). Five patients (20%) treated with regimen A and 13 (54%) treated with regimen B suffered neither nausea nor vomiting (P less than 0.05). Regimen B was found to be significantly more effective than regimen A for all the parameters of evaluation considered. No severe side-effects were observed.