Electrode Surface Area Impacts Measurement of High Frequency Oscillations in Human Intracranial EEG.

OBJECTIVE: High-frequency oscillations (HFOs) are a promising prognostic biomarker of surgical outcome in patients with epilepsy. Their rates of occurrence and morphology have been studied extensively using recordings from electrodes of various geometries. While electrode size is a potential confounding factor in HFO studies, it has largely been disregarded due to a lack of consistent evidence. Therefore, we designed an experiment to directly test the impact of electrode size on HFO measurement. METHODS: We first simulated HFO measurement using a lumped model of the electrode-tissue interaction. Then eight human subjects were each implanted with a high-density 8x8 grid of subdural electrodes. After implantation, the electrode sizes were altered using a technique recently developed by our group, enabling intracranial EEG recordings for three different electrode surface areas from a static brain location. HFOs were automatically detected in the data and their characteristics were calculated. RESULTS: The human subject measurements were consistent with the model. Specifically, HFO rate measured per area of tissue decreased significantly as electrode surface area increased. The smallest electrodes recorded more fast ripples than ripples. Amplitude of detected HFOs also decreased as electrode surface area increased, while duration and peak frequency were unaffected. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that HFO rates measured using electrodes of different surface areas cannot be compared directly. SIGNIFICANCE: This has significant implications for HFOs as a tool for surgical planning, particularly for individual patients implanted with electrodes of multiple sizes and comparisons of HFO rate made across patients and studies.

RITS: a toolbox for assessing complex interventions via interrupted time series models.

BACKGROUND: Various interacting and interdependent components comprise complex interventions. These components create difficulty in assessing the true impact of interventions designed to improve patient-centered outcomes. Interrupted time series (ITS) designs borrow from case-crossover designs and serve as quasi-experimental methodology able to retrospectively assess the impact of an intervention while accounting for temporal correlation. While ITS designs are aptly situated for studying the impacts of large-scale public health policies, existing ITS software implement rigid ITS methodology that often assume the pre- and post-intervention phases are fully differentiated (by a known change-point or set of time points) and do not allow for changes in both the mean functions and correlation structure. RESULTS: This article describes the Robust Interrupted Time Series (RITS) toolbox, a stand-alone user-friendly application researchers can use to implement flexible ITS models that estimate the lagged effect of an intervention on an outcome, level and trend changes, and post-intervention changes in the correlation structure, for single and multiple ITS. The RITS toolbox incorporates a formal test for the existence of a change in the outcome and estimates a change-point over a set of possible change-points defined by the researcher. In settings with multiple ITS, RITS provides a global over-all units change-point and allows for unit-specific changes in the mean functions and correlation structures. CONCLUSIONS: The RITS toolbox is the first piece of software that allows researchers to use flexible ITS models that test for the existence of a change-point, estimate the change-point (if estimation is desired), and allow for changes in both the mean functions and correlation structures at the change point. RITS does not require any knowledge of a statistical (or otherwise) programming language, is freely available to the community, and may be downloaded and used on a local machine to ensure data protection.

BrainWave Nets: Are Sparse Dynamic Models Susceptible to Brain Manipulation Experimentation?

Sparse time series models have shown promise in estimating contemporaneous and ongoing brain connectivity. This paper was motivated by a neuroscience experiment using EEG signals as the outcome of our established interventional protocol, a new method in neurorehabilitation toward developing a treatment for visual verticality disorder in post-stroke patients. To analyze the [complex outcome measure (EEG)] that reflects neural-network functioning and processing in more specific ways regarding traditional analyses, we make a comparison among sparse time series models (classic VAR, GLASSO, TSCGM, and TSCGM-modified with non-linear and iterative optimizations) combined with a graphical approach, such as a Dynamic Chain Graph Model (DCGM). These dynamic graphical models were useful in assessing the role of estimating the brain network structure and describing its causal relationship. In addition, the class of DCGM was able to visualize and compare experimental conditions and brain frequency domains [using finite impulse response (FIR) filter]. Moreover, using multilayer networks, the results corroborate with the susceptibility of sparse dynamic models, bypassing the false positives problem in estimation algorithms. We conclude that applying sparse dynamic models to EEG data may be useful for describing intervention-relocated changes in brain connectivity.