Electronic transmission of digital echocardiographic studies: effects of MPEG compression.

The acquisition, storage and retrieval of digital echocardiographic studies greatly facilitates image review and quantitation and permits the transmission of studies electronically. However, the considerable size of digital echocardiographic data files makes transmission over existing networks slow and impractical. Reduction in the size of these data files can be accomplished with digital image compression. We sought to evaluate the effects of MPEG-1 compression on the transfer time of digital echocardiographic studies over currently available network connections. Ninety consecutive routine clinical echocardiographic studies were randomly compressed at one of three compression ratios 60:1, 80:1, or 120:1 and sent to a receiving terminal using simulated transmission rates. Compression of digital echocardiographic studies at these ratios which, have been shown to maintain diagnostic image quality, reduced the size of digital echocardiographic studies to less than 1% of their original sizes which allowed transmission of echocardiographic studies over networks using 3ISDN or T1 lines with minimal waiting time.

Effects of MPEG compression on the quality and diagnostic accuracy of digital echocardiography studies.

The advantages of digital echocardiography studies include ease of retrieval, review, comparison, duplication, and quantitation as well as the potential for moving studies over networks. However, the large amounts of data associated with digital echocardiography studies have posed new problems. Reduction of the amount of data can be accomplished with image compression, in particular MPEG-1 (Moving Pictures Expert Group), which is designed for dynamic image sequences. However the effects of different levels of compression on the quality and diagnostic content of echocardiographic images need to be established. Digital sequences of single cardiac cycles were acquired in 40 consecutive patients, MPEG-1-compressed at different effective ratios (60:1, 80:1, 120:1, 200:1, 300:1, 370:1, 500:1), reviewed, and scored for endocardial visualization. The overall visualization scores and percentages of nonvisualized segments in the compressed images were not different from the uncompressed images up to a compression ratio of 200:1. Differential effects of compression were noted on a segmental basis and also varied with baseline image quality. The ability to correctly identify regional wall motion abnormalities did not decrease until compression ratios of 1:200 or higher were used. Digital echocardiography loops, MPEG-1-compressed at an effective ratio of 200:1, demonstrate no degradation in endocardial visualization quality or diagnostic content. Compression at this ratio has the potential to reduce the storage size of digital echocardiography studies to less than 1% of their current size.