Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 39(1): 30-6, 2011 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20417112

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In 2009 a method of creating individual, patient specific orbital wall implants using rapid prototyping (RP) was shown in a preliminary human study. That study showed that it is financially viable to produce anatomical models and that this technology could be used in the repair of orbital floor fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 24 consecutive subjects who had sustained orbital fractures (14 males, 6 females) without any coexisting central nervous system or globe injury were assessed post-operatively. The first series of 12 patients, recruited during the period 2005-2006, were treated with classical method (CM) of forming titanium mesh by manual manipulation, based on individual subjective assessment of the extent and shape of damaged orbital walls. The following 12 cases, recruited between 2007 and 2008, were treated with patient specific titanium mesh implants designed with an RP method. Early (2 weeks) and late (12 months) follow-up was performed. Patients were evaluated by binocular single vision (BSV) test and an assessment of eye globe motility. RESULTS: The superiority of the RP treatment method over CM was shown on the basis of early results when BSV loss area and reduction of vertical visual disparity (VVD) in upgaze were considered. Better outcomes for the RP group were confirmed in the late follow-up results which showed a reduction of BSV loss area, correction of primary globe position and a very significant improvement in upgaze. CONCLUSIONS: One-year post-operatively, functional assessment of pre-bent individual implants of the orbital wall has shown the technique to be a predictable reconstruction method. Nevertheless longer follow-up and an increase in the number of cases treated are required for the full evaluation of the technique.


Assuntos
Medições dos Movimentos Oculares , Fraturas Orbitárias/cirurgia , Implantes Orbitários , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/instrumentação , Desenho de Prótese , Testes Visuais , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Materiais Biocompatíveis , Desenho Assistido por Computador , Diplopia/terapia , Movimentos Oculares/fisiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Imageamento Tridimensional/métodos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos da Motilidade Ocular/terapia , Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Telas Cirúrgicas , Titânio , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Interface Usuário-Computador , Visão Binocular/fisiologia , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Cataract Refract Surg ; 35(9): 1563-9, 2009 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19683153

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) after coaxial 1.8 mm microincision cataract surgery (MICS) and bimanual 1.7 mm MICS calculated with 3 mathematical methods. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland. METHODS: Study comprised a nonrandomized prospective consecutive series of 58 eyes of 58 patients who had uneventful coaxial MICS with implantation of an Akreos MI60 foldable intraocular lens (IOL) using a 1.8 mm temporal clear corneal incision. Fifty eyes of 50 patients who had uneventful bimanual MICS through a 1.7 mm clear corneal incision for a sleeveless phaco tip and a 1.5 mm side port for an irrigating chopper with implantation of an Acri.Smart 48S foldable IOL served as a comparison group. All surgery was performed by 2 experienced surgeons. Surgically induced astigmatism was calculated using 3 methods. RESULTS: The patients were examined preoperatively and 2 weeks to 1 month postoperatively. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were seen in any patient. The corrected distance visual acuity improved significantly in both groups after surgery (P<.01); the visual outcomes were not significantly different (P>.05). In vector analysis, the mean SIA was 0.42 +/- 0.29 in the coaxial MICS group and 0.50 +/- 0.24 in the bimanual group; the difference was not statistically significant (P>.05). In vector decomposition, the mean SIA (C90) coaxial MICS group was 0.23 +/- 0.29 in the coaxial MICS group and 0.23 +/- 0.22 in the bimanual MICS group; the difference was not significant. Using the Naeser method, DeltaKP-90 was calculated, amounting to 0.05 +/- 0.44 in the coaxial MICS group and -0.04 +/- 0.42 in the bimanual MICS group; the difference was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: The amount of SIA induced by bimanual MICS and coaxial MICS phacoemulsification was very small. The bimanual MICS induced a slightly higher degree of SIA; however, according to all methods of SIA analysis, there was no significant difference in the mean SIA induced by both techniques.


Assuntos
Astigmatismo/etiologia , Microcirurgia/métodos , Facoemulsificação/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Catarata/complicações , Córnea/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Derivados da Hipromelose , Implante de Lente Intraocular , Masculino , Metilcelulose/administração & dosagem , Metilcelulose/análogos & derivados , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Refração Ocular/fisiologia , Viscossuplementos/administração & dosagem , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...