NCCN Practice Guidelines for Cancer-Related Fatigue.

These guidelines propose a treatment algorithm in which patients are evaluated regularly for fatigue, using a brief screening instrument, and are treated as indicated by their fatigue level. The algorithm's goal is to identify and treat all patients with fatigue that causes distress or interferes with daily activities or functioning. Management of fatigue begins with primary oncology team members who perform the initial screening and either provide basic education and counseling or expand the initial screening to a more focused evaluation for moderate or higher levels of fatigue. At this point the patient is assessed for the five primary factors known to be associated with fatigue: pain, emotional distress, sleep disturbance, anemia, and hypothyroidism. If any of these conditions are present, it should be treated according to practice guidelines, and the patient's fatigue should be reevaluated regularly. If none of the primary factors is present or the fatigue is unresolved, a more comprehensive assessment is indicated--with referral to other care providers as appropriate. The comprehensive assessment should include a thorough review of systems, review of medications, assessment of comorbidities, nutritional/metabolic evaluation, and assessment of activity level. Management of fatigue is cause-specific when conditions known to cause fatigue can be identified and treated. When specific causes, such as infection, fluid and electrolyte imbalances, or cardiac dysfunction, cannot be identified and corrected, nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic treatment of the fatigue should be considered. Nonpharmacologic interventions may include a moderate exercise program to improve functional capacity and activity tolerance, restorative therapies to decrease cognitive alterations and improve mood state, and nutritional and sleep interventions for patients with disturbances in eating or sleeping. Pharmacologic therapy may include drugs such as antidepressants for depression or erythropoietin for anemia. A few clinical reports of the use of corticosteroids and psychostimulants suggest the need for further research on these agents as a potential treatment modalities in managing fatigue. Basic to these interventions, the effective management of cancer-related fatigue involves an informed and supportive oncology care team that assesses patients' fatigue levels regularly and systematically and incorporates education and counseling regarding strategies for coping with fatigue (Johnson, 1999), as well as using institutional fatigue management experts for referral of patients with unresolved fatigue.

Differences in fatigue by treatment methods in women with breast cancer.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To investigate the differences between various cancer therapies (radiation, hormonal, chemotherapy, and their combinations) and the specific dimensions of fatigue (affective meaning, behavioral/severity, cognitive/mood, and sensory). DESIGN: Descriptive, cross-sectional, mailed survey design. SAMPLE AND SETTING: Data were collected from women who were breast cancer survivors and members of a nonprofit educational organization in the North-east. Criteria for this study included no self-reported disease recurrence, and treatment was within 18 months prior to the mailed survey (N = 322). The typical participant was middle-aged (mean = 52.2; SD = 10.3), Caucasian (93%), postmenopausal (55%), and diagnosed with cancer 2.42 (SD = 2.6) years prior to the study. METHODS: Secondary data analysis from a study using the Piper Fatigue Scale. VARIABLES: Level of fatigue. FINDINGS: Significant differences were found by treatment in total fatigue scores (p < 0.03) and cognitive/mood scores (p < 0.05). Women who received combination therapy had the highest fatigue scores (mean = 4.8; SD = 2.0); those who received only radiation therapy had the lowest fatigue scores (mean = 2.7; SD = 2.0). CONCLUSIONS: Fatigue in breast cancer survivors varies by type of cancer therapy. Future studies are needed to investigate the relationships between fatigue and hormonal therapy, and they need to be designed to examine changes over time. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Study findings advance knowledge about fatigue in women with breast cancer and aid nurses in providing anticipatory guidance for women undergoing different treatment regimens.

The revised Piper Fatigue Scale: psychometric evaluation in women with breast cancer.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To confirm the multidimensionality of the Piper Fatigue Scale (PFS) and to reduce the total number of PFS items without compromising reliability and validity estimates. DESIGN: Methodologic, part of a larger, cross-sectional, mailed survey design study. SETTING: Urban and suburban area in the northeast United States. SAMPLE: As part of the larger study, 2,250 surveys were distributed to women survivors of breast cancer who were on a mailing list for the educational organization Living Beyond Breast Cancer, 715 surveys (32%) were returned. Of these, 382 women met this methodologic study's criteria for having completed each of the 40 items on the PFS. The average respondent was 50 years old, postmenopausal, and treated with combination cancer therapy. METHODS: Principal axes factor analysis with oblique rotation. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Fatigue factors/subscales. FINDINGS: Five factors/subscales were identified initially. Because the fifth factor contained only two items (ability to bathe/wash and ability to dress), these items and the associated factor/subscale were dropped from the final solution. An additional nine items, not loading on any factor (> 0.40), also were dropped. The remaining items and factors/subscales were reviewed to ensure that the criteria were met: a pattern of inter-item correlations between 0.30-0.70; a minimum number of five or more items/subscale; standardized alpha for the subscales and total scale of at least 0.89; and absence of gender-specific items. CONCLUSIONS: The revised version of the PFS consists of 22 items and four subscales: behavioral/severity (6 items), affective meaning (5 items), sensory (5 items) and cognitive/mood (6 items). Standardized alpha for the entire scale (n = 22 items) is 0.97, indicating that some redundancy still may exist among the items. Additional revisions await further testing. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: As fatigue is acknowledged to be the most frequent symptom experienced by patients with cancer, accurate measurement and assessment is essential to advance not only the science of fatigue but, most importantly, to evaluate the efficacy of intervention strategies on patient and family outcomes.

Recent advances in the management of biotherapy-related side effects: fatigue.

Limited information about fatigue patterns in patients with cancer exists in the biotherapy literature. When fatigue is mentioned, it is usually to state whether or not it was a dose-limiting side effect. No further data are provided on how fatigue was measured; which patterns were noted and when; and which relationships were found between fatigue and demographic characteristics, type of biologic response modifier, route of administration, or cumulative dose. Thus, there is little available in the biotherapy literature to guide nursing practice in managing this side effect. Theory that guides practice, however, often emanates from the personal experiences of the patients and from the clinical observations and intuitive hunches of the nurses and physicians participating in clinical trials. These individuals have been most generous in sharing their insights and unpublished data with the authors. This paper presents a comprehensive view of current knowledge on fatigue to guide present nursing practice with patients receiving biotherapy and to provide direction for future nursing and clinical trial research.

Anorexia, serum zinc, and immunologic response in small cell lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and prophylactic cranial radiotherapy.

Anorexia is a major clinical problem for patients with certain types of cancer. The specific mechanisms that result in this spontaneous decline in food intake remain unknown. In noncancer populations, zinc has been shown to play a role in maintaining normal appetite, taste acuity, and immunocompetence. One purpose of this prospective, longitudinal study of cachexia in ten males with small cell lung carcinoma was to determine if anorexia (caloric intake), perceived taste changes, zinc intake, and impaired cellular immunity were associated with serum zinc concentrations. The average daily caloric intake declined 490 kcal from time of diagnosis to seven months after diagnosis (mean caloric intake = 72% of RDA). Daily zinc intake ranged from 6.5 to 25.4 mg over the seven months. During this period, the mean serum zinc concentrations, although low (71 micrograms/dl), remained within the normal range. The average weight declined from 81.7 to 74.1 kg. There was no identifiable pattern of perceived taste changes; most of the perceived changes were recorded during the period coinciding with prophylactic cranial radiation. At the initial testing, four of nine subjects were anergic to a battery of skin test antigens (mumps, candida, tuberculin purified protein derivative). The only subject who remained responsive to two antigens throughout the study remained alive at 12 months. Caloric intake was inadequate to maintain weight. While zinc intake was low, low normal serum zinc concentrations were maintained; thus in this sample, serum zinc does not appear to be the anorexigenic factor.

Anorexia and weight loss: indicators of cachexia in small cell lung cancer.

A study was conducted to determine the incidence and extent to which anorexia, a decrease in spontaneous food intake, contributes to the occurrence of cancer cachexia. Data for ten male subjects with small cell carcinoma of the lung are reported for a five-month period following diagnosis. Although body weights of the subjects at the time of diagnosis averaged less than 95% of the usual weight (weight 6 months prior to diagnosis), they were greater than 109% of the mean ideal weight. At five months, the mean weight (N = 8) was 88% of the preillness weight. From the time of diagnosis, there was a mean loss of 7.2 kg (15.8 lb). The urinary creatinine excretion was below the normal range, whereas the urinary urea nitrogen values were within the normal range. At the time of diagnosis, the mean triceps skin-fold measurements were approximately 80% of the standard reference for males. During the five-month period, the mean midarm muscle circumference determinations remained greater than 90% of the reference standard. The mean serum transferrin values were 10% or more below the reported lower range of normal, whereas the great majority of the serum albumin values were 3.0 g/dl or above during the five-month period. The mean caloric intake of 2,204 kcal at the time of diagnosis was only 86% of the estimated basal energy expenditure (BEE) times a factor of 1.5 used to account for moderate activity. Four months following diagnosis, the mean caloric intake had fallen to 1,702 kcal, only 67% of the BEE X 1.5 (calculated from the weight at diagnosis). The findings provide evidence of a decline in spontaneous food intake, a small decrease in body fat, and a greater than 13% weight loss. The oral intake was less than adequate for any activity beyond the basal state. Decreased intake could account for most of the weight loss observed in the subjects.