Results after spica cast immobilization following hip reconstruction in 95 cases: is there a need for alternative techniques?

INTRODUCTION: Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), neurogenic dysplasia of the hip (NDH), and Perthes disease often require surgical treatment. Spica casting is a common postoperative immobilization. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the complications related to the immobilization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, we included 83 patients (95 hips), who underwent hip reconstructive surgery between 2008 and 2018. We had 43 female and 40 male patients. Age reached from 3 months to 19 years. All patients were treated with a spica cast postoperatively for a 6-week protocol. Complications were analyzed using the full medical documentation and classified according to Clavien-Dindo. RESULTS: We had complications in 23 patients (27.7%). We counted superficial skin lesions in seven, deep skin lesions in three, spasticity of adductors in three, subluxation in two, infection of the plate in one, fracture of the plate in one, compliance problem in one, dislocations of the cast in two, reluxation in one, delayed bone healing in one and spasticity of knee flexors in one case. According to the classification of Clavien-Dindo, we were able to count ten type I, four type II, nine type III, zero type IV and zero type V adverse events. CONCLUSION: The usage of a spica cast after hip reconstructive surgery is still the most popular way of aftertreatment. It has a low complication rate, which may be lowered by well-applied casts and foam padding. Known complications such as spasticity in patients with cerebral palsy, skin lesions, and pressure sores should be observed and avoided. Shorter protocols for immobilization with the usage of foam padding and foam splints lead to less complications. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Evidence level level IV, case series.

Intermediate to long-term clinical outcomes and survival analysis of the Salto Mobile Bearing total ankle prothesis.

INTRODUCTION: Osteoarthritis of the ankle is a major burden to affected patients. While tibio-talar arthrodesis has been the gold-standard regarding the treatment of osteoarthritis of the ankle joint for many years, at present total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) provides appealing clinical outcomes and is continually gaining popularity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intermediate- to long-term clinical outcome including the survival rate of Salto Mobile Bearing TAA (Tonier SA, Saint Ismier, France). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective study intermediate- to long-term outcomes measures [Ankle Range of Motion (ROM), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS score) and survival rate] of 171 consecutive TAA were analysed and compared before and after surgery. Revision was defined as secondary surgery with prothesis component removal, while reoperation was defined as a non-revisional secondary surgery involving the ankle. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up (FU) period of 7.2 ± 2.7 years (range 2.0 to 14.1 years) there was a significant improvement in ankle ROM (total ROM improved from 25.0° ± 15.0° to 28.7° ± 11.3°, p = 0.015; plantarflexion improved from 18.4° ± 11.7° to 20.6° ± 8.2°, p = 0.044; dorsiflexion improved from 6.6° ± 5.7° to 8.1° ± 4.9°, p = 0.011). AOFAS score increased significantly by 41 ± 15 points after surgery (43.3 ± 11.1 before and 84.3 ± 12.0 after surgery, p < 0.001). Overall survival rate within the FU was 81.3% (95% CI 75.3% to 87.3%) with any secondary surgery, 89.9% (95% CI 84.1% to 93.6%) with revision and 93.6% (95% CI 89.8% to 97.3%) with reoperation as endpoint. CONCLUSION: This study endorses the previously reported appealing intermediate- to long-term outcomes of the Salto Mobile Bearing TAA. There was a significant increase in ROM and AOFAS score as well as decent implant survival at final FU.

Coccygectomy for coccygodynia: a cohort study with a long-term follow-up of up to 29 years.

PURPOSE: We aim to critically review the effectiveness and safety of coccygectomy with special regard to long-term outcomes. METHODS: Coccygectomy was performed in our clinic in 38 patients between 1990 and 2019. All these patients (32 females vs. 6 males) have failed to respond to conservative treatment for at least 6 months prior to surgery. All patients were available for follow-up after mean 12,3 years (2 months to 29 years, 11 patients had a minimum FUP of 24 years). We evaluated all patients clinically and radiologically. RESULTS: Nineteen patients reported traumatic and 17 patients reported idiopathic onset of their symptoms; one patient had clinical symptoms after childbirth and another patient had coccygodynia after extensive low back surgery. 36 of our 38 patients were free of pain at least 6 months after surgery and had good or excellent clinical results according to the VAS which improved from 6.37 (SD 1.08) preoperatively to 0.68 (SD 0.99) at the recent follow-up. Two patients showed an ODI > 22 at the recent follow-up (24 and 28) and 32 had an ODI equal or under 4. There was no statistical significant difference in terms of clinical outcome between the different radiological types of the coccyx. Postoperative complications were rare: 1 superficial infection and one re-operation 6 months after initial surgery due to an pre-existing exostosis which had not been removed at the index surgery; no neurological complications and no major bleeding occurred. No patient had recurrent onset of coccygodynia. 37 out of 38 patients would have coccygectomy again. CONCLUSIONS: Coccygectomy is a safe treatment option in patients with coccygodynia and shows excellent long-term results. We recommend to perform coccygectomy if patients fail to respond to conservative treatment for 6 months. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Straight stem and threaded cup in patients under 60 years of age: 28.8-30.2 years of follow-up.

PURPOSE: The aim of this retrospective observational study of one cohort was to evaluate the long-term outcome in patients younger than 60 years after total hip arthroplasty using a straight uncemented stem and an uncemented threaded cup. METHODS: Between 1986 and 1987, 75 hips of 75 patients (mean age, 53.35 ± 6.17 years) were consecutively implanted with an Alloclassic Zweymüller/Alloclassic SL stem and an Alloclassic CSF cup. Forty-four patients had died over the last 30 years. The remaining 31 patients (mean age, 82.9 ± 6.4 years) were reinvited for follow-up examinations. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were carried out. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 29.5 (28.8-30.2), 4 patients (5.3%) were lost to follow-up. For the endpoint aseptic loosening (defined as the removal of stem or the cup for 2 cases), the overall survival rate is 97.3%. For the endpoint revision for any reason (22 patients), the survival rate is 70.6%. Eleven patients needed an exchange of head and liner, caused by wear. The average time from implantation until change of head and liner was 21.44 years (SD 5.92). Other reasons for revision surgery were septic loosening (3 cases), aseptic loosening of stem and cup (1 case), aseptic loosening of stem (1 case), periprosthetic calcification (2 cases), implant fracture (1 case), periprosthetic fracture (1 case), intraoperative fissure of stem (1 case), and total wear of liner including cup (1 case). CONCLUSION: The combination of a straight stem (Alloclassic) and a screw cup (CSF) shows excellent results in young patients under the age of 60 at ultra-long-term follow-up at 30 years. Revisions due to wear of the polyethylene liner are more likely than in the older patients.