Multicenter study to assess presenteeism in systemic lupus erythematosus and its relationship with clinical and sociodemographic features.

Objective The aim of this study was to measure presenteeism (productivity impairment while the patient is at work) and the related risk factors in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) from Argentina. Methods A total of 130 consecutive (1997 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria) working patients with SLE were assessed using a standardized data collection form. Sociodemographic, disease and work-related variables were collected. The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire was performed. Results Overall, 130 patients were included in the analysis; 91% were women, and the mean age was 39 years (range 19-77). A total of 43% were White, 43% Mestizo and 13% Amerindian. Overall, 38% were single and 38% were married. A total of 75% had more than 12 years of formal education. The median disease duration was 7 years (interquartile range 25-75 (IQR) 4-13). Median Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) score was 0 (IQR 0-2), and median Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/ACR Damage Index (SLICC-SDI) score was 0 (IQR 0-1). Lupus quality of life (LupusQoL) domains scores were: physical health 87 (IQR 70-96), emotional health 78 (IQR 54-91), burden to others 75 (IQR 50-92), intimate relationships 87 (IQR 50-100), and body image 85 (IQR 70-100). Absenteeism was 8%, presenteeism was 19%, and overall work impairment (absenteeism + presenteeism) was 26%. In the multiple regression analysis, considering presenteeism as dependent variable, (adjusting by age, disease duration, >12 years of education, Non-white race, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain, VAS fatigue, SLICC-SDI, LupusQoL, physical and emotional domains), we found that SLICC-SDI (odds ratio (OR) 1.68, confidence interval (CI) 1-2.7) and Non-white race (OR 3.27, CI 1.04-10) were related to presenteeism and >12 years of education (OR 0.30, CI 0.09-0.98) and higher scores of LupusQoL emotional health domain (OR 0.95, CI 0.92-0.98) were protective. Conclusions organ damage and Non-white race were significantly associated with presenteeism while >12 years of education and higher scores of LupusQoL emotional health domain were protective.

B Cell Lymphoma mimicking Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Non Hodking´s lymphoma (NHL) may involve bones but synovial involvement is uncommon. We describe a patient who presented with polyarthritis, sicca symptoms and rash suggestive of rheumatoid arthritis. An atypical skin rash prompted skin and synovial biopsies. A diagnosis of synovial and skin malignant large B-cell lymphoma anaplastic subtype was performed. Chemotherapy with dexamethasone, vincristine and rituximab was started. Following treatment the patient had complete resolution of cutaneous and articular lymphoma manifestations.

Failure of intravenous immunoglobulin to prevent congenital heart block: Findings of a multicenter, prospective, observational study.

OBJECTIVE: Congenital heart block (CHB) is presumed to be caused by transplacental passage of maternal immunoglobulin against Ro and La ribonucleoproteins. The recurrence rate in subsequent pregnancies following the birth of a child with CHB is approximately 19%. The purpose of this study was to determine whether intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy could prevent the development of CHB in the fetuses of high-risk pregnant women. METHODS: A total of 24 pregnancies in 22 women who had a previous pregnancy in which CHB developed, were over the age of 18 years, were <12 weeks pregnant, and had anti-Ro, anti-La, or both antibodies were monitored in this multicenter, prospective, observational study. Fifteen patients received infusions of IVIG. The 9 pregnancies in the remaining 7 patients served as controls. IVIG was administered at a dose of 400 mg/kg at weeks 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 of pregnancy. Echocardiograms were performed at least every 3 weeks from week 15 to week 30 of gestation. Electrocardiograms were obtained at birth. The outcome measure was the development of third-degree CHB detected by fetal echocardiogram. RESULTS: CHB developed in 3 babies among the 15 pregnancies in the treatment group (20%) and in 1 baby among the 9 pregnancies in the control group (11%). CHB was detected at weeks 18, 23, and 26, respectively, in the 3 babies in the treated group and at week 19 in the baby in the control group. Three of the affected pregnancies ended in termination; 2 for reasons related to the fetal disease and 1 for reasons related to both maternal (severe pulmonary hypertension) and fetal disease (at 21 weeks of gestation). CONCLUSION: IVIG at the dose and frequency used in this study was not effective as prophylactic therapy for CHB in high-risk mothers.

Update on immunotherapy for systemic lupus erythematosus--what's hot and what's not!

There have been significant advances in the treatment of SLE, which have produced major impacts on morbidity and in some cases mortality. The major drugs of the last three decades in treatment of SLE have been corticosteroids, AZA, MTX and cyclophosphamide. However, these drugs have considerable toxicities, and with the increasing knowledge of the immune system, and further understanding of SLE immunopathogenesis, many groups are seeking to identify and trial novel immunotherapeutic strategies. These have included therapies aimed at influencing particular immune cells (e.g. B cells) and molecules (e.g. costimulatory molecules, cytokines) which are thought to be important in disease pathogenesis. The advantage of such therapies is that efficacy may be achieved with lower toxicity, and without wide-ranging suppression of the immune system. Success has not always been achieved by specific design of immunotherapies for SLE, and the best recent example has been the use of B-cell depletion therapy, a concept derived from its successful use in RA. In this article, we discuss those immunotherapeutic strategies that have arrived as far as clinical trials in human subjects. In addition to these relatively specific immunotherapies, we also highlight the use of mycophenolate mofetil, an anti-proliferative immunosuppressant which has had good success over the last 10 yrs, with similar early efficacy to cyclophosphamide when used as induction therapy for lupus nephritis. Data are presented on more generalized immune strategies, such as the use of stem cell transplantation and intravenous immunoglobulin.

Morbidity and mortality in the antiphospholipid syndrome during a 5-year period: a multicentre prospective study of 1000 patients.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the main causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) during a 5-year period and to determine clinical and immunological parameters with prognostic significance. METHODS: The clinical and immunological features of a cohort of 1000 patients with APS from 13 European countries who had been followed up from 1999 to 2004 were analysed. RESULTS: 200 (20%) patients developed APS-related manifestations during the 5-year study period. Recurrent thrombotic events appeared in 166 (16.6%) patients and the most common were strokes (2.4% of the total cohort), transient ischaemic attacks (2.3%), deep vein thromboses (2.1%) and pulmonary embolism (2.1%). When the thrombotic events occurred, 90 patients were receiving oral anticoagulants and 49 were using aspirin. 31/420 (7.4%) patients receiving oral anticoagulants presented with haemorrhage. 3/121 (2.5%) women with only obstetric APS manifestations at the start of the study developed a new thrombotic event. A total of 77 women (9.4% of the female patients) had one or more pregnancies and 63 (81.8% of pregnant patients) had one or more live births. The most common fetal complications were early pregnancy loss (17.1% of pregnancies) and premature birth (35% of live births). 53 (5.3% of the total cohort) patients died. The most common causes of death were bacterial infection (21% of deaths), myocardial infarction (19%) and stroke (13%). No clinical or immunological predictor of thrombotic events, pregnancy morbidity or mortality was detected. CONCLUSION: Patients with APS still develop significant morbidity and mortality despite current treatment (oral anticoagulants or antiaggregants, or both).

Mycophenolate mofetil treatment in resistant myositis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in six patients with myositis refractory to conventional immunosuppressive therapy. METHODS: Six patients were identified from hospital notes. All had previously failed to respond to other immunosuppressive treatments. Efficacy was measured as changes in muscle strength, creatine kinase (CK) levels and prednisolone dose. RESULTS: The mean age of the group was 49.8 +/- 9.1 yrs, 6 (100%) were female and Caucasian. Patients had failed to respond to a median of 3 (range 1-3) immunosuppressive drugs. They received MMF for a mean of 22.3 +/- 18.9 months with a mean MMF dose of 1.6 +/- 0.5 g/day. The mean initial prednisolone dose was 13.7 +/- 7.7 mg and the mean follow up dose was 8.5 +/- 4.9 mg/day (P = 0.03). CK levels were reduced from mean 2395 IU/l +/- 1202.8 to 746.6 +/- 555.8 IU/l (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that MMF may be effective in myositis, previously unresponsive to conventional immunosuppressive drugs.

Treatment of menorrhagia associated with oral anticoagulation: efficacy and safety of the levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine device (Mirena coil).

Menorrhagia is common in women receiving oral anticoagulation. In healthy women, reductions of up to 90% of menstrual loss have been described with the levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUS). However there is no data about the use of LNG-IUS in women receiving oral anticoagulation and so we assessed the efficacy and safety of LNG-IUS in this setting. Patients with menorrhagia who used LNG-IUS and warfarin were contacted by post and asked to complete a questionnaire assessing the extent and duration of menstrual bleeding, quality of life and treatment satisfaction. The questionnaire was sent to 23 patients and returned by 17. The amount of bleeding was reduced with the LNG-IUS in 10 (58.8%) women; amenorrhea occurred in four (23.5%), no change in blood loss in one (5.9%) and greater blood loss in two (11.8%) patients. The number of sanitary pads used was less in 12 (70.6%) patients; same in one (5.9%) patient, more in two (11.8%) patients and two (11.8%) did not remember. Five patients (29.4%) had shorter duration of bleeding, four (23.5%) had amenorrhoea, four (23.5%) had longer periods and four (23.5%) had same duration by subjective assessment. Eight (47.1%) patients felt very satisfied, four (23.5%) felt satisfied, two (11.8%) felt dissatisfied with the treatment, one felt very dissatisfied (5.9%) and two (11.8%) did not respond to the question. This small study suggests LNG-IUS is effective in reducing the duration and amount of menstrual bleeding in women with menorrhagia associated with oral anticoagulation. We feel the use of LNG-IUS is a major advance in reducing menorrhagia in women on oral anticoagulation as the previous alternative--hysterectomy--is associated with an increased risk of thrombosis and bleeding.

Reduction of proteinuria with mycophenolate mofetil in predominantly membranous lupus nephropathy.

INTRODUCTION: Lupus membranous nephropathy (LMN) presents a difficult clinical problem as no particular treatment has been proven to be effective. Studies have shown good results with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in proliferative lupus nephropathy (LN) (WHO class III and IV disease). OBJECTIVES: To study whether MMF treatment was effective in membranous predominant LN in patients resistant to or intolerant of other immunosuppressive agents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 10 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus who had biopsy-proven predominant LMN (six Vc patients and four Va or Vb patients). Previous treatments included cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, ciclosporin and corticosteroids. The following parameters were recorded at baseline and follow-up: blood pressure, ECLAM, proteinuria, serum albumin and creatinine, routine haematology and immunology. RESULTS: The study included eight women and two men, mean age 38.4 +/- 7.1 yr (range 30-49 yr). The racial distribution was as follows: five Caucasian, and five Black patients. The mean treatment time with MMF was 18.8 +/- 15.4 months (range 3-52 months). Twenty-four-hour urinary protein excretion was reduced from median 2.26 g (range 0-7.92 g) to median 0.66 g (range 0.08-3.85 g) at follow-up (P = 0.0039). Serum albumin increased significantly after treatment from median 29.5 g/l (range 14.0-42.0 g/l) to 33.5 g/l (range 23.0-40.0 g/l) at follow-up (P = 0.04). There were no significant changes in serum creatinine (P = 0.55). CONCLUSION: MMF is a potentially useful immunosuppressive agent in reducing the proteinuria associated with membranous predominant LN.

Skin manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus refractory to multiple treatment modalities: poor results with mycophenolate mofetil.

OBJECTIVE: Skin disease can be one of the most refractory clinical manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The standard therapy consists of sunscreens, topical corticosteroids and antimalarials. However in difficult cases a variety of other drugs have been tried. Here we describe our clinical experience with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in patients with cutaneous manifestations of SLE. METHODS: Seven patients with SLE and skin involvement (including acute cutaneous lupus, subacute cutaneous lupus, discoid lupus erythematosus, vasculitis, urticarial rash and chilblain lupus) who had received treatment with MMF were included. The clinical characteristics, serologicalfindings and response to treatment were recalledfrom retrospective review of the files. RESULTS: Our results showed no response in 5 patients, partial response in 1 patient and initial response but skin flare whilst on MMF in 1 patient. The median dose of MMF was 2 g (range 2-3 g). Adverse events on MMF were mild, mainly gastrointestinal and occurred in 5 patients. No patients discontinued MMF due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: MMF appears not to be particularly effective in the treatment of skin disease in SLE. It should be noted that our group of patients had previously failed to respond to a median of 4 (range 2-10) different drugs used to treat SLE skin disease. Thus, the patients in the study could be considered at the severe end of skin disease spectrum.

Mycophenolate mofetil and systemic lupus erythematosus: an overview.

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressive agent used in transplantation, with evidence of superior protection against acute transplant rejection compared to azathioprine-containing regimens. Subsequently MMF has been used in a variety of autoimmune conditions. The major experience in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has focused on proliferative lupus nephritis. Following its success in the treatment of lupus nephritis, MMF is now being used to control other SLE manifestations such as, lupus disease activity, haematological manifestations and resistant skin lupus. In this review, we discuss our own experience and the literature report about the use of MMF in SLE.