In Vivo Changes in Dynamic Adjacent Segment Motion 1 Year After One and Two-Level Cervical Arthrodesis.

Biomechanical cadaver testing indicates adjacent segment motion increases after one-level anterior cervical spine arthrodesis, and two-level arthrodesis exacerbates these effects. There is little in vivo evidence to support those biomechanical studies. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of one- and two-level cervical arthrodesis on adjacent segment motion. Fifty patients received either one-level C56 arthrodesis or two-level C456 or C567 arthrodesis and were tested preoperatively (PRE) and 1 year postoperatively (1YR-POST) along with 23 asymptomatic controls. A validated CT model-based tracking technique was used to measure 3D vertebral motion from biplane radiographs collected during dynamic flexion-extension and axial rotation of the cervical spine. Head and adjacent segment intervertebral end-range range of motion (ROM) and mid-range ROM were compared between one-level and two-level arthrodesis patients and controls. Small (2.3° or less) but non-significant increases in adjacent segment end-range ROM were observed from PRE to 1YR-POST. Mid-range flexion-extension ROM in the C67 motion segment inferior to the arthrodesis and mid-range axial rotation ROM in the C45 motion segment superior to the arthrodesis increased from PRE to 1YR-POST (all p < 0.022). This study provides in vivo evidence that contradicts long-held beliefs that adjacent segment end-range ROM increases appreciably after anterior cervical arthrodesis and that two-level arthrodesis exacerbates these effects. Mid-range ROM appears to be more useful than end-range ROM for detecting early changes in adjacent segment motion after cervical spine arthrodesis.

The effects of pathology and one-level versus two-level arthrodesis on cervical spine intervertebral helical axis of motion.

The etiology of adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) remains controversial. Range of motion (ROM) is typically used to infer the effects of arthrodesis on adjacent segment motion following ACDF, however, ROM only measures the total amount of motion. In contrast, the helical axis of motion (HAM) quantifies how the motion occurs and may provide additional insight into the etiology of adjacent segment pathology. Synchronized biplane radiographs of the cervical spine were acquired at 30 images per second while 62 ACDF patients and 38 control participants performed dynamic neck flexion/extension. A validated tracking process matched digitally reconstructed radiographs created from subject-specific bone models to the radiographs with sub-millimeter accuracy. The intervertebral HAM was then calculated and compared between pre and 1 year post surgery in patients, and between patients and controls at corresponding motion segments using linear mixed-effects analysis. Small differences in the anterior/posterior location of the HAM were found between the symptomatic motion segments before surgery and corresponding motion segments in controls. No changes in the HAM of motion segments adjacent to the arthrodesis were observed from pre to 1-year post-surgery. No differences in adjacent segment HAM were found between patients with one- versus two-level arthrodesis. Neither symptomatic pathology nor arthrodesis appear to change the way motion occurs in the cervical spine during flexion/extension one year after one or two-level arthrodesis. These results suggest ACDF does not alter short-term adjacent segment kinematics in a way that would contribute to the development of adjacent segment disease.

Residual Motion and Graft Type Do Not Influence Patient-reported Outcomes Following One- or Two-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of graft type on residual motion and the relationship among residual motion, smoking, and patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although most patients develop solid fusion based on static imaging following ACDF, dynamic imaging has revealed that many patients continue to have residual motion at the arthrodesis. METHODS: Forty-eight participants performed dynamic neck flexion/extension and axial rotation within a biplane radiography system 1 year following ACDF (21 one-level, 27 two-level). PRO scores included the Short Form-36, Neck Disability Index, and Cervical Spine Outcomes Questionnaire. An automated model-based tracking process matched subject-specific bone models to the biplane radiographs with sub-millimeter accuracy. Residual motion was measured across the entire arthrodesis site for both one- and two-level fusions in patients who received either allograft or autograft. Patients were divided into "pseudarthrosis" (>3° of flexion/extension residual motion) and "solid fusion" groups. Residual motion and PROs were compared between groups using Student t tests. RESULTS: Patients who received allograft showed more total flexion/extension residual motion (4.1° vs. 2.8°, P = 0.12), although this failed to reach significance. No differences were noted in PROs based on graft type (all P > 0.08) or the presence of pseudarthrosis (all P > 0.13). No differences were noted in residual motion between smokers and nonsmokers (all P > 0.15); however, smokers who received allograft reported worse outcomes than nonsmokers who received allograft and smokers who received autograft. CONCLUSION: Allograft may result in slightly more residual motion at the arthrodesis site 1 year after ACDF. However, there is minimal evidence that PROs are adversely affected by slightly increased residual motion, suggesting that the current definition of pseudarthrosis correlates poorly with clinically significant findings. Additionally, autograft appears to result in superior outcomes in patients who smoke.Level of Evidence: 2.