Improvements to Rapfish: a rapid evaluation technique for fisheries integrating ecological and human dimensions.

This paper reports recent developments in Rapfish, a normative, scalable and flexible rapid appraisal technique that integrates both ecological and human dimensions to evaluate the status of fisheries in reference to a norm or goal. Appraisal status targets may be sustainability, compliance with a standard (such as the UN code of conduct for responsible fisheries) or the degree of progress in meeting some other goal or target. The method combines semi-quantitative (e.g. ecological) and qualitative (e.g. social) data via multiple evaluation fields, each of which is assessed through scores assigned to six to 12 attributes or indicators: the scoring method allows user flexibility to adopt a wide range of utility relationships. For assessing sustainability, six evaluation fields have been developed: ecological, technological, economic, social, ethical and institutional. Each field can be assessed directly with a set of scored attributes, or several of the fields can be dealt with in greater detail using nested subfields that themselves comprise multidimensional Rapfish assessments (e.g. the hierarchical institutional field encompasses both governance and management, including a detailed analysis of legality). The user has the choice of including all or only some of the available sustainability fields. For the attributes themselves, there will rarely be quantitative data, but scoring allows these items to be estimated. Indeed, within a normative framework, one important advantage with Rapfish is transparency of the rigour, quality and replicability of the scores. The Rapfish technique employs a constrained multidimensional ordination that is scaled to situate data points within evaluation space. Within each evaluation field, results may be presented as a two-dimensional plot or in a one-dimensional rank order. Uncertainty is expressed through the probability distribution of Monte-Carlo simulations that use the C.L. on each original observation. Overall results of the multidisciplinary analysis may be shown using kite diagrams that compare different locations, time periods (including future projections) and management scenarios, which make policy trade-offs explicit. These enhancements are now available in the R programming language and on an open website, where users can run Rapfish analyses by downloading the software or uploading their data to a user interface.

Steroid hormones and agonistic behavior in a cichlid teleost, Aequidens pulcher.

The effects of three steroid hormones on the agonistic behavior of female Aequidens pulcher have been evaluated. Testosterone, estradiol, and cortisol were tested using an immersion technique to minimize trauma, and we also examined metyrapone, a blocker of cortisol biosynthesis. Two different experimental protocols were employed, the first investigating agonistic interactions within groups of fish, and the second examining the responses of isolated fish to models and mirrors. Differences between replicates were small, and both protocols supported similar conclusions. Each of the three hormones produced a characteristically different spectrum of behaviors when compared to the controls. Testosterone increased agonistic behavior in all experimental situations, while estradiol had a generally opposite effect; this may reflect the natural modulation of behavior by hormones during the reproductive cycle of A. pulcher. Cortisol also had distinct behavioral effects; available evidence suggests that this steroid increases submissive components of agonistic behavior, and that observed increases in some aggressive components are an indirect consequence, dependent upon the feedback of social information received by each fish. Metyrapone treatment greatly reduced all agonistic behaviors, groups of fish forming shoals typical of juveniles. This was not reversed by replacement therapy with cortisol, which suggests that metyrapone affects behavior by an alternative, possibly toxic, mechanism.

Evidence against a hydrodynamic function for fish schools.

THERE are numerous explanations for the formation of fish schools(1,2), one of the most popular being that the members gain hydrodynamic advantage over solitary individuals(3-6). The model proposed by Weihs(5,6) for the first time makes precise predictions about school structure which can be verified. We report here the first empirical test of this model, and demonstrate that three species of schooling fish do not swim in appropriate positions to gain hydrodynamic advantage.

A blind fish can school.

Vision is not required in order for fish to school. Five individual saithe, Pollachius virens, were able to join schools of 25 normal saithe swimming in an annular tank, while blinded with opaque eye covers. Test fish maintained position within the school indefinitely and responded to short-term movements of individuals within the school, although quantitative differences in reaction time and schooling behavior were noted. Five fish with lateral lines cut at the opercula were unable to school when wearing opaque eye covers. Although it is unlikely that blind saithe could school in the wild, the constraints of the apparatus permitted a demonstration of a role of the lateral line organ in schooling.