Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 15(6): e0235428, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32579591

RESUMO

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232943.].

2.
PLoS One ; 15(5): e0232943, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32428036

RESUMO

Over the past few decades many corporate organisations have moved to open-plan office designs, mostly due to financial and logistical benefits. However, recent studies have found significant drawbacks to open plan offices and it is unclear how office designs can facilitate the best work output and company culture. Current design practice aims to optimise efficiency of space, but no previous research has tested the effect of office design experimentally in a working office. This paper describes an experiment comparing four different office designs (Open-plan, Zoned open-plan, Activity based, and Team offices) against a suite of wellbeing and productivity metrics in a real world technology company. Results suggest that two very different designs (Zoned open-plan and Team offices) perform well compared to Open-plan office designs. Zoned open-plan and Team office designs improved employee satisfaction, enjoyment, flow, and productivity, while Activity based and Open-plan designs performed poorly by comparison. The Open-plan office design was rated more poorly by employees, had higher levels of unsafe noise, and once employees no longer had to be in the Open-plan office design of the experiment, they spent more time at their desks.


Assuntos
Planejamento Ambiental/tendências , Decoração de Interiores e Mobiliário/métodos , Local de Trabalho/psicologia , Adulto , Eficiência , Feminino , Humanos , Satisfação no Emprego , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Projetos Piloto , Inquéritos e Questionários , Tecnologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...