Average volume-assured pressure support vs conventional bilevel pressure support in pediatric nocturnal hypoventilation: a case series.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Average volume-assured pressure support (AVAPS) is a modality of noninvasive ventilation that provides a targeted tidal volume by automatically adjusting the inspiratory pressure support within a set range. Pediatric studies evaluating the efficacy of AVAPS in treating nocturnal hypoventilation are confined to case reports. The aim of this study was to compare AVAPS to conventional bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) support in improving hypercarbia in a cohort of pediatric patients with nocturnal hypoventilation. METHODS: Retrospective review of patient records at an established tertiary pediatric sleep laboratory over a 6-year period. Ventilatory and sleep study parameters from AVAPS and conventional BPAP titration studies were compared. AVAPS was used only if hypoventilation was not controlled using conventional BPAP. Inspiratory pressures, tidal volumes, and adherence were downloaded on final titrated ventilatory settings. Comparisons were made using paired t test. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients (11 boys, 8 girls; median age 10.5 years, range 1 to 20 years) were identified. Diagnoses included neuromuscular disease (n = 9), obstructive hypoventilation (n = 5), parenchymal lung disease (n = 4), and congenital central hypoventilation syndrome (n = 2). AVAPS demonstrated significant improvement in peak (P = .009) and mean (P = .001). Transcutaneous CO2 parameters compared to conventional bilevel. Oxygenation on AVAPS showed positive trend but did not reach statistical significance. AVAPS delivered higher tidal volumes (P = .04) using similar pressures. There was no statistically significant difference in obstructive apnea-hypopnea index, respiratory arousal index, sleep efficiency, and adherence between AVAPS and conventional BPAP. CONCLUSIONS: AVAPS was an effective alternative to conventional BPAP in improving hypercarbia in our selective cohort of pediatric patients. Prospective, longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate the benefits of AVAPS feature in the pediatric population.

Nasal mask average volume-assured pressure support in an infant with congenital central hypoventilation syndrome.

Congenital central hypoventilation syndrome (CCHS) is a rare disorder characterized by alveolar hypoventilation and autonomic dysregulation secondary to mutations of the PHOX 2B genes. Treatment consists of assisted ventilation using positive pressure ventilators via tracheostomy, bi-level positive airway pressure (BPAP), negative pressure ventilators, or diaphragm pacing. Previous case reports have highlighted early use of nasal non-invasive BPAP use in infants with CCHS. We present a case of a 10-month-old infant who was successfully managed on a new feature of non-invasive ventilation called average volume assured pressure support (AVAPS) without the need for tracheostomy. The AVAPS feature enables the machine to automatically adjust the inspiratory pressures to deliver a constant targeted tidal volume. This feature enabled a better control of ventilation as indicated by a more stable transcutaneous carbon dioxide profile compared to conventional nasal non-invasive BPAP, making non-invasive ventilation a more accessible method of managing sleep hypoventilation in CCHS.

Validation of the Sonomat Against PSG and Quantitative Measurement of Partial Upper Airway Obstruction in Children With Sleep-Disordered Breathing.

Study Objectives: To validate the Sonomat against polysomnography (PSG) metrics in children and to objectively measure snoring and stertor to produce a quantitative indicator of partial upper airway obstruction that accurately reflects the pathology of pediatric sleep-disordered breathing (SDB). Methods: Simultaneous PSG and Sonomat recordings were performed in 76 children (46 male, age 5.8 ± 2.8, BMI = 18.5 ± 3.8 kg/m2). Sleep time, individual respiratory events and the apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) were compared. Obstructed breathing sounds were measured from the unobtrusive non-contact experimental device. Results: There was no significant difference in total sleep time (TST), respiratory events or AHI values, the latter over-estimated by 0.3 events hr-1 by the Sonomat. Poor signal quality was minimal and gender, BMI, and body position did not adversely influence event detection. Obstructive and central events were classified correctly. The number of runs and duration of snoring (13 399 events, 20% TST) and stertor (5748 events, 24% TST) were an order of magnitude greater than respiratory events (1367 events, 1% TST). Many children defined as normal by PSG had just as many or more runs of snoring and stertor as those with mild, moderate and severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Conclusions: The Sonomat accurately diagnoses SDB in children using current metrics. In addition, it permits quantification of partial airway obstruction that can be used to better describe pediatric SDB. Its non-contact design makes it ideal for use in children.