Townes-Brocks Syndrome Revealed by Kidney Gene Panel Testing.

Introduction: Townes-Brocks syndrome (TBS), a rare autosomal dominant genetic condition associated with SALL1 (Spalt like Transcription Factor 1), is reported to be present in 1:238,000 individuals in the general population. TBS is characterized by the triad of anorectal malformations, dysplastic ears, with or without hearing impairment, and hand or thumb anomalies. Although kidney involvement is less common in TBS, the disease can progress to kidney failure. Here, we sought to characterize the incidence of SALL1 variants in individuals undergoing broad-based genetic testing with a kidney gene panel and to quantify the presence of (extra)renal features. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the genetic data from a 385-gene panel identified cases with a pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) variant in SALL1. Data including age, features, and disease progression were collected. Results: Of 35,044 samples, P or LP variants in SALL1 were identified in 22, yielding a prevalence of 1:1592 among patients tested for monogenic kidney disease, and 1:342 among cases identified with a monogenic kidney disease. Among this cohort, the median patient age was 23 years (range: 3 months-62 years) with chronic kidney disease (CKD) reported in 91% (20/22) of cases. Reported kidney features included renal agenesis/hypoplasia (7/22; 32%), focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (4/22; 18%), and kidney cysts (3/22; 14%). Confirmed extrarenal features included hearing loss and/or ear features (7/22; 32%), anorectal malformations (6/22; 27%) and hand or thumb abnormalities (4/22; 18%). Three patients (3/22; 14%) had both a priori TBS diagnoses and the traditional "triad." Conclusion: Traditionally, a molecular diagnosis was ascertained primarily in individuals presenting with cardinal features of TBS; therefore, individuals with mild or atypical presentations were often overlooked clinically. Our findings reveal that SALL1 P/LP variants could be a consequential contributor to monogenic kidney disease.

Genetic Counseling in Kidney Disease: A Perspective.

As genetic testing is increasingly integrated into nephrology practice there is a growing need for partnership with genetic experts. Genetic counselors are ideally suited to fill this role. The value of genetic counseling is born out of the clinical value of genetic test results against the backdrop of the complexity of genetic testing. Genetic counselors who specialize in nephrology are trained to understand and explain the potential effects of genes on kidney disease, which can enable patients to make informed decisions about proceeding with genetic testing, navigating variants of uncertain significance, educating on extrarenal features of hereditary kidney disease, facilitating cascade testing, providing post-test education about testing results, and assisting with family planning. Genetic counselors can partner with the nephrologist and provide the knowledge needed to maximize the use of genetic testing for patients for nephrology consultation. Genetic counseling is more than an element or extension of genetic testing; it is a dynamic, shared conversation between the patient and the genetic counselor where concerns, sentiments, information, and education are exchanged, and value-based decision making is facilitated.

Is It Time to Utilize Genetic Testing for Living Kidney Donor Evaluation?

Living donor kidney transplantation is an effective strategy to mitigate the challenges of solid organ shortage. However, being a living kidney donor is not without risk, as donors may encounter short- and long-term complications including the risk of developing chronic kidney disease, end-stage kidney disease, hypertension, and possible pregnancy-related complications. Although the evaluation of potential living donors is a thorough and meticulous process with the intention of decreasing the chance of complications, particularly in donors who have lifetime risk projection, risk factors for kidney disease including genetic predispositions may be missed because they are not routinely investigated. This type of testing may not be offered to patients due to variability and decreased penetrance of symptoms and lack of availability of appropriate genetic testing and genetic specialists. We report a case of a middle-aged woman with a history of gestational diabetes and preeclampsia who underwent an uneventful living kidney donation. She developed postdonation nonnephrotic range proteinuria and microscopic hematuria. Given the risk of biopsy with a solitary kidney, genetic testing was performed and revealed autosomal dominant Alport syndrome. Our case underscores the utility of genetic testing. Hopefully, future research will examine the incorporation of predonation genetic testing into living kidney donor evaluation.