Correction to: A prospective randomized trial comparing corifollitropin-α late-start (day 4) versus standard administration (day 2) in expected poor, normal, and high responders undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF.

The original article unfortunately has a missing acknowledgement.

A prospective randomized trial comparing corifollitropin-α late-start (day 4) versus standard administration (day 2) in expected poor, normal, and high responders undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether corifollitropin-α (CFα) late-start administration (day 4) and standard administration (day 2) can obtain similar oocyte yield and live birth rate. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. SETTING: University Hospital IVF Unit. PATIENTS: One hundred thirteen women undergoing IVF. INTERVENTIONS: Patients distributed in three subgroups (expected poor, normal, or high responders to FSH) were randomized into two treatment arms: (a) CFα late-start: CFα on day 4 + GnRH antagonist from day 8 + (when needed) recFSH from day 11; (b) CFα standard start: CFα on day 2 + GnRH antagonist from day 6 + (when needed) recFSH from day 9. IVF or ICSI was performed as indicated. RESULTS: Considering the whole study group, the late-start regimen obtained comparable oocyte yield (8.9 ± 5.6 vs. 8.8 ± 6.2; p = n.s.), cPR/started cycle (25% vs. 31.6%, p = n.s.), and cumulative live birth rate (LBR)/ovum pickup (OPU) (29.2% vs. 37.7%, p = n.s.) than the standard regimen. The outcome of the two regimens was comparable in the two subgroups of high and normal responders. Differently, in poor responders, oocyte yield was similar, but LBR/OPU was significantly lower with late-start CFα administration that caused 40% cancellation rate due to monofollicular response. ROC curves showed that the threshold AMH levels associated with cycle cancellation were 0.6 ng/ml for late-start regimen and 0.2 ng/ml for standard regimen. CONCLUSION: CFα may be administered on either day 2 or day 4 to patients with expected high or normal response to FSH without compromising oocyte yield and/or live birth rate. Differently, late-start administration is not advisable for expected poor responders with AMH ≤ 0.6 ng/ml. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03816670.

Fertility preservation in BRCA mutation carriers.

According to enhanced long-term survival rates of these patients, interest in fertility preservation for young women facing gonadotoxic therapies is increasing. Women who carry a mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene have a specifically increased lifetime risk of developing breast and tubo-ovarian cancer. Moreover, they are at high risk of undergoing premature infertility due to the medical interventions that are often performed in order to reduce cancer risk or treat an already existing malignancy. Fertility issues are relevant for healthy BRCA mutation carriers, whose family-planning decisions are often influenced by the need of prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at young age. In BRCA mutation carriers who have a breast cancer at young age, the oncostatic treatment is associated with a significant ovarian toxicity linked to chemotherapy as well as to the long lasting hormonotherapy and to the need of delaying pregnancy for several years. Prompt counselling about different fertility preservation options should be offered to all young girls and women at high risk of ovarian insufficiency and infertility. Validated techniques to preserve fertility include oocyte and embryo cryopreservation, while experimental techniques include ovarian suppression with GnRH-analogs during chemotherapy and ovarian tissue cryopreservation. The choice of the best strategy depends on age, type of chemotherapy, partner status, cancer type, time available for fertility preservation intervention and the risk of ovarian metastasis. All available options should be offered and can be performed alone or in combination. A crucial point is to avoid a significant delay to cancer treatment.

Fertility preservation in BRCA mutation carriers.

Interest in fertility preservation for young women facing gonadotoxic therapies is increasing according to enhanced long-term survival rates of these patients. Women who carry a mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene have a specifically increased lifetime risk of developing breast and tubo-ovarian cancer. Moreover, they are at high risk of undergoing premature infertility due to the medical interventions that are often performed in order to reduce cancer risk or treat an already existing malignancy. Fertility issues are relevant for healthy BRCA mutation carriers, whose family-planning decisions are often influenced by the need of prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at young age. In BRCA mutation carriers who have a breast cancer at young age, the oncostatic treatment is associated with a significant ovarian toxicity linked to chemotherapy as well as to the long lasting hormonotherapy and to the need of delaying pregnancy for several years. Prompt counselling about different fertility preservation options should be offered to all young girls and women at high risk of ovarian insufficiency and infertility. Validated techniques to preserve fertility include oocyte and embryo cryopreservation, while experimental techniques include ovarian suppression with GnRH-analogues during chemotherapy and ovarian tissue cryopreservation. The choice of the best strategy depends on age, type of chemotherapy, partner status, cancer type, time available for fertility preservation intervention and the risk of ovarian metastasis. All available options should be offered and can be performed alone or in combination. A crucial point is to avoid a significant delay to cancer treatment.

Efficacy and safety of late-start Corifollitropin-alfa administration for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF: a cohort, case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate efficacy and safety of a controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocol in which a single dose of Corifollitropin-alfa (CFα) was administered on day 4 of a GnRH-antagonist cycle. DESIGN: Cohort case-control study. SETTING: University Hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred twenty-two normally cycling women expected to be normal responders to COS. INTERVENTIONS: In 61 patients, CFα (100-150 µg) was injected subcutaneously on day 4 of a spontaneous menstrual cycle; a GnRH-antagonist was added from day 8 (fixed protocol; 0.25 mg/day). If needed to complete follicular maturation, recombinant FSH (rFSH) daily injections (150/200 IU/day) were given from day 11. A control group of 61 matched women was stimulated with daily subcutaneous injections of rFSH (100-150 U/day) from day 4 of the cycle, and received GnRH-antagonist (0.25 mg/day) from day 8. IVF or ICSI was performed according to the sperm characteristics, and 1-2 embryos were transferred in utero under US guidance on day 2. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of retrieved cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs), clinical pregnancy rate (PR), implantation rate (IR), ongoing PR at 10 weeks, number of injections/cycle, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rate. RESULTS: No cycle was cancelled and the mean number of retrieved COCs was comparable in patients and controls. About 60% of CF-alfa treated women had no need of daily rFSH addition, and the mean number of injections/cycle was significantly lower in the CF-alfa group than in controls (p < 0.05). The ongoing PR/transfer was 36.8% in CF-alfa group and 37.5% in controls. No patient developed severe OHSS, and the incidence of moderate OHSS was similar in cases and controls. CONCLUSIONS: CFα may be started on day 4 of the cycle obtaining results comparable to those of a COS using day 4-start daily rFSH, with significantly less injections and a similar risk of OHSS.

MILD ovarian stimulation with GnRH-antagonist vs. long protocol with low dose FSH for non-PCO high responders undergoing IVF: a prospective, randomized study including thawing cycles.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of two stimulation protocols in non-polycystic ovary (PCO) high responders undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). DESIGN: Prospective randomized trial. SETTING: A Reproductive Medicine and IVF Unit of a University Hospital and a private IVF Clinic. METHODS: Four hundred-and-twelve normoovulatory women with good ovarian responsiveness were randomized to receive either the "mild" (FSH 150 IU/day from day 4 of a spontaneous cycle followed by GnRH-antagonist from day 8; n = 205) or the "long" (FSH 150 IU/day; n = 207) stimulation protocol. The outcome of these two regimens was compared including "fresh" and thawing cycles. RESULTS: The total FSH dose and the peak estradiol level were significantly lower in the "mild" protocol, whereas the retrieved oocytes, fertilization rate, number and quality of embryos, pregnancy and implantation rates, cumulative "fresh plus thaw" success rate, and incidence of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome were comparable with the two regimens. CONCLUSIONS: In young, normoovulatory patients with good ovarian responsiveness undergoing IVF the "mild" stimulation protocol has effectiveness and risks comparable to the "long" protocol with low FSH starting dose, even when thawing cycles are included in the comparison.

Sorafenib inhibits growth, migration, and angiogenic potential of ectopic endometrial mesenchymal stem cells derived from patients with endometriosis.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the proliferation, migration, and angiogenic properties of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) from ectopic and eutopic endometrial tissue and to investigate the effect of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib. DESIGN: In vitro studies. SETTING: University hospital and research center. PATIENT(S): Patients receiving surgical treatment of endometriosis (n = 4) and control patients without endometriosis (n = 2) undergoing surgery for benign gynecologic diseases. INTERVENTION(S): Mesenchymal stem cell lines were isolated from ectopic and eutopic endometrial tissue, and sorafenib was administered to them. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Proliferation, migration, invasion of endometrial MSC, and expression of ezrin, vascular endothelial growth factor, and hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) were measured. RESULT(S): Ectopic endometrial MSC from patients with endometriosis showed a higher proliferation, migration, and angiogenic ability than eutopic MSC from the same patient or control MSC from patients without endometriosis. Sorafenib reduced the proliferation, motility, ezrin phosphorylation, vascular endothelial growth factor release, and HIF-1α expression of ectopic MSC. CONCLUSION(S): The increased proliferative, migratory, and angiogenic phenotype of ectopic MSC may be reverted by treatment with sorafenib. Targeting of the MSC population involved in sustaining the ectopic lesions might be useful in eradicating endometriotic implants.