Associating Student Performance in Pharmacy Practice Didactic and Skills-Based Courses With Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences.

Objective. To determine the association between pharmacy practice didactic course examinations and performance-based assessments with students' performance during their advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs).Methods. This retrospective analysis included data from the graduating classes of 2018 to 2020. Students were coded as APPE poor performers (final course grade <83%) or acceptable performers. Assessments in pharmacy practice didactic and skills-based courses in students' second and third years were included in the analysis, with thresholds correlating to grade cutoffs. The association between poor performance mean examination scores and performance-based assessments with APPE performance was calculated.Results. Of the 403 graduates, analysis sample sizes ranged from 254 to 403. There were 49 students (12%) who met the criteria for poor performance in the APPE year. When comparing pharmacy practice didactic course performance to APPE poor performance, the proportion of mean examination scores that were <83% for six of the seven pharmacy practice didactic courses was significant; five of the seven mean examination scores were significant at the <78% threshold. Performance-based assessments that were significantly associated with APPE poor performance often required critical thinking.Conclusion. A gap in identification of students with APPE poor performance who did not fail a didactic course was demonstrated. Specifically, this finding suggests that pre-APPE curriculum should focus on assessments that include critical thinking. These methods could be used by other pharmacy programs to find components of their curricula that help identify students who need additional support prior to the APPE year.

Best Practices for Use of Blended Learning.

Objective. To determine instructional best practice recommendations for use of blended learning from the students' perspective. Methods. Three focus groups were created, one for each of the first three years at a school of pharmacy. The focus group discussions were audio recorded and transcribed for content analysis. Results. Ten instructional best practices were identified from the focus groups: setting the stage, consistency when team teaching, timeliness in posting materials, time on task, accountability for online activities, use of structured active learning, instructor use of feedback on student preparation, incorporation of student feedback into the course, short reviews of online material during class, and ensuring technologies are user friendly. Conclusion. Instructors using blended learning should consider incorporating these best practices into their course design and management. More evaluation is needed to see if implementation of these practices affects student performance.

Comparison of online versus classroom delivery of an immunization elective course.

OBJECTIVE: To compare performance and preferences of students who were randomly allocated to classroom or online sections of an elective course on immunization. METHODS: Students were randomly assigned to either the classroom or online section. All course activities (lectures, quizzes, case discussions, vaccine administration, and final examination) were the same for both sections, except for the delivery of lecture material. ASSESSMENT: Students were surveyed on their preferences at the beginning and end of the semester. At the end of the semester, the majority of students in the classroom group preferred classroom or blended delivery while the majority of students in the online group preferred blended or online delivery (p<0.01). Student performance was compared at the end of the semester. There was no significant difference for any of the grades in the course between the 2 sections. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in student performance between the classroom and online sections, suggesting that online delivery is an effective way to teach students about immunization.

An online virtual-patient program to teach pharmacists and pharmacy students how to provide diabetes-specific medication therapy management.

OBJECTIVE: To develop, implement, and assess the effectiveness of an online medication therapy management (MTM) program to train pharmacists and pharmacy students in providing MTM services for patients with diabetes and to increase their intent to perform these services. DESIGN: An online program was created using an Internet-based learning platform to simulate 4 MTM meetings between a pharmacist and a virtual patient diagnosed with diabetes. ASSESSMENT: Eighty students and 42 pharmacists completed the program. After completing the program, scores on post-intervention assessments showed significant improvement in 2 areas: control over performing MTM, and knowledge of how to perform MTM. Students had a significantly less-positive attitude about MTM and a decline in their perception of the social expectation that MTM is part of the practice of pharmacy, while pharmacists' attitudes did not change significantly in these areas. CONCLUSION: This online program using a virtual patient improved both participants' belief that they have control over performing MTM, and their knowledge of how to perform MTM for diabetic patients, which may increase the likelihood that pharmacists and pharmacy students will perform MTM in the future.