Determination of impedance changes at varying frequencies in relation to root canal file position and irrigant.

This study was conducted on 10 anterior and premolar teeth that were scheduled for endodontic treatment. After length of tooth determination, a series of test K-file handles were locked at lengths varying from 3 mm short to 0.5 mm long of the foramen. Samples of impedance were taken at each length with a digital signal processor at six different frequencies and for each of seven different irrigants or canal conditions. A total of five different root canal irrigants were used in each tooth (RC Prep, 70% isopropyl alcohol, 14.45% EDTA sodium solution, normal saline, and 5.25% NaOCl), along with two variations of a dry canal. The greatest impedance changes occurred +/- 0.25 mm from the foramen. No significant difference was noted in prediction error at different frequencies (p > 0.05); however, prediction error was significant with respect to different irrigants (p < 0.02). Conductive irrigants demonstrated less change of electrical characteristics with length than nonconductive irrigants, thus allowing a greater prediction of file position in relation to the foramen using electrically nonconductive irrigants.

A radiographic comparison of two root canal instrumentation techniques.

The ability of two instrumentation techniques to negotiate and enlarge small curved canals was com-compared radiographically. Fifty canals in extracted human molar teeth were instrumented by the progressive enlargement (PE) technique, a form of step-back preparation using standard K files, or by the balanced force (BF) technique using K files whose tips had been specially modified. By using drawings and projected radiographic images of the files, the position of the largest file used in the apical preparation, #30 or #35 for the PE technique and #45 for the BF technique, was compared with the position of a small file placed in the canal before instrumentation. The PE and BF techniques were equally capable of instrumenting small curved canals to their respective largest apical preparation sizes. However, at sizes equivalent to the largest apical preparation sizes used in the PE technique, the BF technique produced significantly less deviation from the center of the original canal.