Addition of a fracture risk assessment to a coordinator's role improved treatment rates within 6 months of screening in a fragility fracture screening program.

We evaluated the impact of a more intensive version of an existing post-fracture coordinator-based fracture prevention program and found that the addition of a full-risk assessment improved treatment rates. These findings provide additional support for more intensive programs aimed at reducing the risk of re-fractures. INTRODUCTION: Evidence-based guidelines support coordinator-based programs to improve post-fracture osteoporosis guideline uptake, with more intensive programs including bone mineral density (BMD) testing and/or treatment being associated with better patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a more intensive version (BMD "fast track") of an existing provincial coordinator-based program. METHODS: We compared two versions of the program that screened treatment naïve fragility fracture patients (>50 years). Cases came from the BMD fast track program that included full fracture risk assessment and communication of relevant guidelines to the primary care provider (PCP). Matched controls were selected from the usual care program matching according to age, sex, fracture type, and date. Two matching techniques were used: traditional (hard) matching (TM) and propensity score matching (PS). The outcomes were treatment initiation with bone sparing medication, BMD testing rate, and the rate of returning to discuss the test results with a PCP. RESULTS: The program improvements led to a significant improvement in treatment initiation within 6 months from 16 % (controls based on PS) or 21 % (controls based on TM) to 32 % (cases). Ninety percent of patients in the BMD fast track program returned to their PCP to discuss bone health in the cases versus 60 % of the controls (for TM and PS). BMD testing occurred in 96 % of cases compared to the 66 (TM) or 65 % (PS) of the matched controls. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of a full-risk assessment to a coordinator-based program significantly improved treatment rates within 6 months of screening.

Should Delayed Cholecystectomy Following Acute Calculous Cholecystitis Be Discouraged in a Resource-restricted Setting?

BACKGROUND: Early cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) reduces hospital stay and complications during the waiting period. The purpose of this study is to establish the patterns of management of ACC at the University Hospital of the West Indies (UHWI) and to evaluate the advantages of early versus delayed cholecystectomy. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of patients admitted with a diagnosis of ACC. Data collection included demographics, management strategy, timing to cholecystectomy, significant events while awaiting cholecystectomy and duration of hospital stay. Mann-Whitney U and Chi-squared tests were used for analysis. P-value of < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 102 patient charts were extracted, 59 of which were managed conservatively and 43 managed with early cholecystectomy. The mean time to surgery after conservative management was 173 days. About 30% of persons managed conservatively had significant attacks while awaiting surgery, which included need for re-admission and earlier intervention. There was a trend toward longer mean total hospital stay in the conservative group (xsx = 5.03, xCons = 6.12; p = 0.054). CONCLUSION: Conservative management of ACC results in significant delays in definitive management and risks of complications during the waiting period. Early cholecystectomy should be encouraged even in a resource-restricted setting.

Psychiatric predictors of surgery non-completion following suitability assessment for bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is recognized as a treatment for severe obesity; however, little is known about factors influencing patient surgery non-completion. This study explored the relationship between psychiatric factors and patient non-completion during the pre-bariatric surgery suitability assessment. METHODS: A total of 367 individuals underwent a structured psychiatric interview and were classified as either surgery completers (SC) or surgery non-completers (SNC) if they attended at least one pre-surgery assessment appointment but did not receive surgery. RESULTS: The results showed that in comparison to the SC group, the SNC group had significantly higher rates of overall past Axis I psychiatric disorders (58.1 vs. 46.6 %, p = 0.035), past anxiety disorders (17.4 vs. 9.4 %, p = 0.03), and past substance use disorders (8.7 vs. 3.7 %, p = 0.03). For specific past psychiatric disorders, the SNC group exhibited significantly higher rates of a past post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (5 vs. 1 %, p = 0.029) and past substance dependence disorder (7 vs. 1 %, p = 0.005). Although overall current psychiatric disorders did not significantly differ between groups, the SNC group had significantly higher rates of current PTSD (2 vs. 0 %, p = 0.049) and current generalized anxiety disorder (4 vs. 0 %, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: A past history of an anxiety or substance use disorder may play a role in patients not completing the assessment component of the bariatric surgery process. Additional psychosocial support, such as cognitive behavioral therapy or targeted psychoeducation, may help improve patient completion of the pre-surgery assessment phase.