Visual and electrical evoked response recorded from subdural electrodes implanted above the visual cortex in normal dogs under two methods of anesthesia.

Sensitive methods are required to record electrical evoked potentials over the visual cortex to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a retinal prosthesis before it can be implanted on the retinal surface of patients afflicted by outer retinal diseases. This study was designed to examine subdural electrodes as a mean to evaluate cortical evoked potentials in response to light and electrical stimulation of the retina in three dogs under two methods of anesthesia-halothane and propofol. Results showed that subdural electrodes could be stabilized over the visual cortex for several (3-5) months, and that they were 6.95 times more sensitive than subdermal electrodes in recording cortical visual evoked potentials (VEPs) and 4.31 times more sensitive in recording cortical electrical evoked potentials under both methods of anesthesia. The waveforms' shape changed for each electrode in the subdural array during 6/6 (100%) and 20/38 (52%) multi-channel recording sessions under halothane and propofol, respectively. This change could point to a cortical retinotopic organization versus hierarchical organization of different cortical areas for a given retinal stimulus. In summary, subdural electrodes show promising results for recording visual and electrical evoked responses (EERs) and thus for evaluation of the retinal prosthesis.

Bioadhesives for intraocular use.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: A safe, effective adhesive could be useful in the management of retinal holes or tears and selected complicated retinal detachments, as well as for attaching a small electronic device (retinal prosthesis) to the retina. In this study, we examined nine commercially available compounds for their suitability as intraocular adhesives. METHODS: The following materials were studied: commercial fibrin sealant, autologous fibrin, Cell-Tak, three photocurable glues, and three different polyethylene glycol hydrogels. An electronic strain gauge measured the adherence forces between different glues and the retina. The stability of hydrogels at body temperature and the impermeability of the hydrogel adhesive to dextran blue were examined. Long-term biocompatibility testing of the most promising glues in terms of adhesive force, consistency, and short-term safety (hydrogels) were done in rabbits. Funduscopy, electroretinogram, and histology of the retina were performed. RESULTS: Hydrogels had 2 to 39 times more adhesive force (measured in mN) than the other glues tested. They liquefied at body temperature after 3 days to a few months. Hydrogels were impermeable to dextran blue. One type of hydrogel proved to be nontoxic to the retina. CONCLUSIONS: Hydrogels proved to be superior for intraocular use in terms of consistency, adhesiveness, stability, impermeability, and safety.