Is tissue polypeptide antigen still a useful tumor marker in breast carcinoma? Comparison with CA15.3 and MCA.

Serum levels of tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) are related to the proliferative activity and to the mass of the malignancy, differently from any other available tumor marker. We therefore evaluated TPA in comparison with CA15.3 and MCA (mucinous-like carcinoma-associated antigen) in patients with primary breast cancer. TPA was measured in tumor cytosol and in serum. Cytosol and serum TPA levels were not significantly correlated. Serum TPA was higher in patients with locally more advanced disease and in receptor-negative cases. The relation between TPA and disease spread was not directly dependent on tumor bulk, whereas CA15.3 and MCA were highly correlated to the number of positive lymph nodes and tumor size. No correlations were found between TPA and CA15.3 or MCA, and the positivity concordance rate between TPA and CA15.3 or MCA was very low. Patients with higher TPA serum levels showed a worse prognosis in cases with and in those without axillary metastases. From our data we conclude that TPA provides information different from that obtained with breast-specific tumor markers and could therefore be useful in association with CA15.3 and/or MCA in the management of patients with breast cancer.

Plasma and tissue CEA and TPA markers in operable breast cancer. Preliminary results.

CEA and TPA were studied in sera and in histologic specimens of 200 patients with benign (77) or malignant (123) breast pathology. The frequency and expression of the two markers was different in benign and in cancer tissues. Histologic positivity and high levels of circulating markers were observed more frequently in cancer patients than in patients with benign disease. Tissue positivity for the two tumor markers did not always correlate with elevated levels of circulating markers. Positive CEA and TPA incidence was higher in tissue samples than in serum samples. In the breast cancer group, among 33 patients with histologic positivity for CEA, only 5 cases had circulating CEA levels higher than 5 ng/ml; among 91 patients with histologic positivity for TPA, only 45 cases showed circulating levels for TPA higher than 95 U/l. These findings confirm that tumor size, secretory characteristics and vascular supply are factors affecting the achievement of high circulating marker levels. Combined marker measurement in serum and tissues can provide more information about the presence of a given tumor marker. A limited evaluation of the prognostic meaning of the study of combined CEA and TPA in sera and in tissues was carried out during the follow-up of 60 evaluable patients. Only 5 patients had cancer relapses in the first 12 months from surgery; in 2 of 5 patients TPA was positive initially and at the time of recurrence, in serum as well as in tissues. Circulating CEA gave negative findings in all relapsed patients; 2 of them showed weak positivity only in the histologic staining at the time of presentation.