EGS plus: Predicting futility in LVAD patients with emergency surgical disease.

BACKGROUND: While emergent, non-cardiac surgery can be safely performed in LVAD patients, the inherent perioperative challenges of these rare procedures and the perception that these patients may be poor surgical candidates can contribute to reluctance to perform necessary emergency general surgery (EGS) procedures. We, therefore, sought to identify predictors of inpatient mortality to assist perioperative decision-making. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2010-2015Q3) was used to identify patients with previously placed LVADs with a subsequent EGS admission diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of 30-day mortality, and a risk-adjusted probability of death was calculated for significant patient subgroups across age. Additional demographic variables were included in the regression due to clinical relevance. RESULTS: There were 1805 (weighted) LVAD-EGS patients with an overall mortality rate of 11%. Independent predictors of mortality were intestinal ischemia and sepsis present on admission. Patients older than 70 with sepsis had an 80% probability of in-hospital mortality (10.6 OR, 1.70-65.5 95% CI) while those over 70 presenting with intestinal ischemia had a 38% probability of death (3.6 OR, 1.50-8.78 95% CI). Mortality risk for younger patients with sepsis was still approximately 50%. CONCLUSION: Older LVAD patients presenting with either sepsis or intestinal ischemia have a substantial mortality risk while younger patients have a modest risk. These results can be used to guide treatment discussions when emergency surgery is being considered in LVAD patients.

Patient Perceptions of Decision-making and Quality-of-life Following Surgical Resection of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Mixed-methods Study.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a highly lethal disease, with surgery, the only opportunity for cure, accompanied by high rates of morbidity. Understanding patients' lived experiences after surgical resection of PDAC is critical to knowing whether the decision to undergo surgery was worth it for these patients. Methods: We performed a convergent, mixed-methods study with patients who underwent resection of PDAC between January 1, 2019, and January 8, 2020. Quantitative data (medical record review and 3 questionnaires) were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data (semistructured interviews) were analyzed using the constant comparative method. Data were then compared for congruence. Results: Eighteen of 22 eligible participants completed interviews and 11 completed questionnaires. Data collection occurred at a median of 14.2 months (IQR 11.6-16.3) from surgery. We identified 4 main themes. First, persistent negative symptoms were common for patients, but patients adapt to these and are satisfied with their "new normal." Second, patients have varied and continually evolving mindsets throughout their cancer journey. Third, despite decreased quality-of-life, patients have a high degree of satisfaction with their decision to pursue surgery. Finally, patients were okay with a passive role in decision-making around surgery. Despite variable involvement in decision-making and outcomes, no participants reported regret over the decision to pursue surgery. Discussion: This nuanced account of patients' lived experiences following surgery for PDAC allows for an improved understanding of the impact of pancreatic resection on patients. Surgeons can use these data to improve preoperative counseling for patients with PDAC and help guide them to making the correct decisions about surgery.

Drivers of Moral Distress in Surgical Intensive Care Providers: A Mixed Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: Moral distress is common among healthcare providers, leading to staff burnout and attrition. This study aimed to identify root causes of and potential solutions to moral distress experienced by surgical intensive care unit (SICU) providers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a mixed methods study of physicians and nurses from a single, academic SICU. We obtained quantitative data from the Measures of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP) survey and qualitative data from semi-structured interviews. The MMD-HP is a 27 question, validated survey on triggers of moral distress. Survey and interview data were analyzed to identify drivers of moral distress using a convergent design. RESULTS: 21 nurses and 25 physicians were surveyed and 17 providers interviewed. MMD-HP data demonstrated high levels of moral distress for nurses (mean total MMD-HP 132 ± 63.5) and physicians (121.7 ± 64.7), P = 0.68. The most frequent root cause of moral distress for all providers was participating in the delivery of aggressive care perceived to be futile. Nurses also reported caring for patients with unclear goals of care as a key driver of moral distress. Interview data supported these findings. Providers recommended improving access to palliative care to increase early communication on patient goals of care and end-of-life as a solution. Culture in the SICU often promotes supporting aggressive care however, acting as a potential barrier to increasing palliative resources. CONCLUSIONS: Providing aggressive care that is perceived as futile was the primary driver of moral distress in the SICU. Interventions to improve early communication and access to end-of-life care should be prioritized to decrease moral distress in staff.