Kidney Transplantation during the First Year of COVID-19 Pandemic in Our Center

Introduction: SARS-CoV2 pandemic has altered the normal activity in our day-to-day life. During the most critical moments of the pandemic at the hospital, attendance and programmed activities had to be reduced to a minimum, including kidney transplants. Hospitals with this kind of activity had to suspend or restructure it due to the decrease in the number of donors with a solid organ donation profile, the lack of knowledge as to whether the disease could be transmitted through transplantation or the risk that was believed to be associated with the admission of patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease or immunosuppressive treatment. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who had received a kidney transplant at Doctor Peset University Hospital in Valencia was performed from March 2020 to March 2021. The objective was to study the safety of kidney transplantation and the incidence of COVID-19 disease in kidney transplant patients during this pandemic period. Results: 56 cases of kidney transplantation were included, most of them male with an average age of 56 years old, and variable comorbidity such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, an average body mass index of 26 and undergoing renal replacement therapy by hemodialysis. Regarding the organ donors, more than 50% were male patients and the donation was in encephalic death. The average cold ischemia time was 15 hours. Postoperative complications were mostly graded I and II in the Clavien-Dindo classification. 5.4% of the recipients had passed the SARS-CoV2 infection prior to the transplant and 5.4% were infected with COVID-19 after the transplant. Conclusion: In our experience, the current kidney transplant program seems viable and safe, even during periods of health emergencies (AU)

Introducción: La pandemia por SARS-CoV2 ha alterado la actividad habitual en nuestro día a día. Durante losmomentos más críticos de la pandemia a nivel hospitalariose tuvieron que reducir al mínimo la presencialidad y la actividad programada, incluyendo dentro de ésta el trasplanterenal. Los hospitales con dicha actividad tuvieron que suspenderla o bien reestructurarla debido a la disminución en elnúmero de donantes con perfil para la donación de órganossólidos, al desconocimiento de si la enfermedad podía transmitirse a través del trasplante o al riesgo que se creía quepodría conllevar ingresar pacientes con enfermedad renalcrónica terminal o en tratamiento inmunosupresor.Métodos: Se realizó una revisión retrospectiva de lospacientes que recibieron un trasplante renal en el Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset de Valencia desde marzo de2020 hasta marzo de 2021 con el objetivo de estudiar la seguridad del trasplante renal y la incidencia de enfermedadpor COVID-19 en los pacientes trasplantados renales durante este periodo de pandemia.Resultados: Se incluyeron 56 casos de trasplante renal, la mayor parte de ellos de sexo masculino, con una edadmedia de 56 años, un índice de masa corporal medio de 26 yen tratamiento renal sustitutivo mayoritariamente mediantehemodiálisis (50%). Con respecto a los donantes, más del50% eran de sexo masculino y la donación fue en muerteencefálica. El tiempo medio de isquemia fría fue de 15 horas. Las complicaciones posquirúrgicas fueron en su mayoría de grado I y II en la clasificación de Clavien-Dindo.Un 5.4% de los receptores habían pasado la infección porSARS-CoV2 previamente al trasplante y un 5.4% se infectaron por COVID-19 posteriormente al trasplante.Conclusión: En nuestra experiencia, parece viable yseguro el programa de trasplante renal vigente, incluso durante periodos de emergencia sanitaria. (AU)

20 años de experiencia en trasplante renal en bloque de donantes pediátricos en receptores adultos / A 20-year experience in cadaveric pediatric en bloc kidney transplantation in adult recipients

Introducción y objetivos El trasplante renal en bloque de donantes pediátricos en receptores adultos permite aumentar el pool de donantes, pero son pocos los centros que lo realizan. Mostramos los resultados de la técnica en nuestro centro tras su introducción en el año 1999.Material y métodos Análisis retrospectivo de los 42 procedimientos realizados en nuestro centro con una mediana de seguimiento de 73 meses (5-233) en los que se monitorizó la función renal de los pacientes y se registraron las complicaciones sucedidas.Resultados Se han realizado 42 trasplantes renales en bloque en adultos de donantes pediátricos en nuestro centro hasta el momento. La media de edad de los receptores fue de 44,1±11,8 años y la de los donantes de 22,4±14,7 meses, con un peso medio de 11,3±3,6kg. El tiempo medio de isquemia fría fue de 15,7±4,5 h. Al finalizar el seguimiento, 35 injertos eran funcionantes (83,3%) y mantenían una excelente función. Hubo 7 pérdidas de injerto (16,7%) en el postoperatorio inmediato (4 trombosis vasculares, una dehiscencia de anastomosis y 2necrosis corticales) y un fallecimiento durante el seguimiento por una causa no relacionada.Conclusiones El uso de injertos renales en bloque de origen pediátrico en adultos es un procedimiento seguro y con un excelente rendimiento funcional a medio y largo plazo. El postoperatorio inmediato es el periodo en el que se establecen la mayoría de las complicaciones importantes que pueden derivar en la pérdida del injerto. La adecuada selección de donantes y receptores, así como una correcta técnica quirúrgica, son imprescindibles para minimizar la aparición de eventos adversos (AU)

Background En bloc kidney transplantation from pediatric donors into adult recipients increases the donor pool. However, this surgical procedure is not widely performed in many transplant centers. To evaluate the long-term outcomes of bloc kidney transplantation from pediatric donors into adult recipients in a single center.Material and methods Retrospective analysis of 42 patients who received pediatric cadaveric bloc kidney transplantation in our center since 1999. Median follow-up period was 73 months (5-233) in which renal function tests were taken and complications registered.ResultsWe have performed 42 bloc kidney transplantation from pediatric donors into adult recipients in our center. The recipients’ age was 44.1±11.8 years. Pediatric donors were 22.4±14.7 months old and weighted 11.3±3.6kg. Cold ischemia time was 15.7±4.5hours. During a median follow-up of 73 months, 35 patients (83.3%) had graft survival with excellent function (first-year serum creatinine levels of 0.99±0.25mg/dl). There were 7graft losses (16.7%) in the immediate postoperative period (4 cases of vascular thrombosis, one anastomosis dehiscence and 2cortical necrosis).Conclusions The pediatric en bloc renal graft transplantation into adults is a safe technique with excellent medium- to long-term functional performance. The vast majority of significant complications leading to graft loss were reported in the immediate postoperative period. A good selection of donors and recipients as well as an adequate surgical technique are essential to minimize the occurrence of adverse events (AU)

A 20-year experience in cadaveric pediatric en bloc kidney transplantation in adult recipients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: En bloc kidney transplantation (EBKT) from pediatric donors into adult recipients increases the donor pool. However, this surgical procedure is not widely performed in many transplant centers. To evaluate the long-term outcomes of EBKT from pediatric donors into adult recipients in a single center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 42 patients who received pediatric cadaveric EBKT in our center since 1999. Median follow-up period was 73 months (5-233) in which renal function tests were taken and complications registered. RESULTS: We have performed 42 EBKT from pediatric donors into adult recipients in our center. The recipients' age was 44.1 ± 11.8 years. Pediatric donors were 22.4 ± 14.7 months old and weighted 11.3 ± 3.6 kg. Cold ischemia time was 15.7 ± 4.5 h. During a median follow-up of 73 months, 35 patients (83.3%) had graft survival with excellent function (first-year serum creatinine levels of 0.99 ± 0.25 mg/dl). There were seven graft losses (16.7%) in the immediate postoperative period (four cases of vascular thrombosis, one anastomosis dehiscence and two cortical necrosis). CONCLUSIONS: The pediatric en bloc renal graft transplantation into adults is a safe technique with excellent medium- to long-term functional performance. The vast majority of significant complications leading to graft loss were reported in the immediate postoperative period. A good selection of donors and recipients as well as an adequate surgical technique are essential to minimize the occurrence of adverse events.

Masa abdominal indolora / No disponible

No disponible

[Value of transrectal FNA in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in elderly patients]. / Valor de la PAAF transrectal en el diagnóstico del cáncer de próstata en pacientes de edad avanzada.

OBJECTIVES: To identify if there is a group elderly patients with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer in which pathological confirmation may be unnecessary, and if prostatic transrectal fine needle aspiration (FNA) may be a useful diagnostic tool for old patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 72 patients aged 75-93 years were evaluated by means of prostatic transrectal FNA. Antibiotic prophylaxis, analgesia or cessation of anticoagulant therapy were not necessary. RESULTS: In 35 patients (48.6%) cytological diagnosis was positive for prostatic adenocarcinoma, whereas in 37 cytology was negative for cancer. In 100% of patients with PSA > 30 ng/ml or with PSA > 20 ng/ml and suspicious digital rectal examination FNA results were positive for cancer. 4.1% minor and 1.3% major (acute prostatitis) complications after FNA were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In male patients older than 75 years with PSA > 30 ng/ml or with PSA > 20 ng/ml and suspicious digital rectal examination, histological confirmation of carcinoma by prostatic biopsy may be not necessary, because of the high probability of a positive result. When histological confirmation of prostatic carcinoma is required in elderly patients, transrectal prostatic FNA is a valid alternative to transrectal biopsy, due to its excellent tolerance and low complication rate.

Valor de la PAAF transrectal en el diagnóstico del cáncer de próstata en pacientes de edad avanzada / Value of transrectal FNA in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in elderly patients

Objetivos: Identificar si existe algún grupo de varones ancianos con sospecha clínica de cáncer de próstata, en el cual la confirmación anatomopatológica del diagnóstico puede no ser necesaria, y valorar si la punción aspiración con aguja fina (PAAF) transrectal de próstata puede ser adecuada para el diagnóstico en la población anciana. Material y método: Se evaluaron mediante PAAF transrectal a 72 pacientes de edades comprendidas entre 75 y 93 años. No fue necesaria la administración de ningún tipo de profilaxis antibiótica, analgesia, ni el abandono o sustitución de medicación anticoagulante. Resultados: En 35 de estos pacientes (48,6%) el resultado de la citología fue positivo para adenocarcinoma de próstata, mientras que en 37 fue negativo para tumor. En el 100% de los pacientes con PSA > 30 ng/ml o con PSA> 20 ng/ml y tacto rectal sospechoso de cáncer, la PAAF fue positiva. Se detectó un 4,1% de complicaciones menores y un 1,3% de complicaciones mayores (prostatitis aguda). Conclusiones: En varones mayores de 75 años con PSA > 30 ng/ml o con PSA > 20 ng/ml y tacto rectal sospechoso puede no ser necesaria la confirmación histológica de cáncer de próstata mediante biopsia dada la elevada probabilidad de que ésta sea positiva. Cuando se considere necesaria la confirmación anatomopatológica del diagnóstico de cáncer de próstata en pacientes de edad avanzada, la PAAF constituye una buena alternativa a la biopsia transrectal, dada su excelente tolerancia y baja tasa de complicaciones (AU)

Objectives: To identify if there is a group elderly patients with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer in which pathological confirmation may be unnecessary, and if prostatic transrectal fine needle aspiration (FNA) may be auseful diagnostic tool for old patients. Material and methods: A total of 72 patients aged 75 - 93 years were evaluated by means of prostatic transrectal FNA. Antibiotic prophylaxis, analgesia or cessation of anticoagulant therapy were not necessary. Results: In 35 patients (48.6%) cytological diagnosis was positive for prostatic adenocarcinoma, whereas in 37cytology was negative for cancer. In 100% of patients with PSA > 30 ng/ml or with PSA > 20 ng/ml and suspicious digital rectal examination FNA results were positive for cancer. 4.1% minor and 1.3% major (acute prostatitis) complications after FNA were observed. Conclusions: In male patients older than 75 years with PSA > 30 ng/ml or with PSA > 20 ng/ml and suspicious digital rectal examination, histological confirmation of carcinoma by prostatic biopsy may be not necessary, because of the high probability of a positive result. When histological confirmation of prostatic carcinoma is required in elderly patients, transrectal prostatic FNA is a valid alternative to transrectal biopsy, due to its excellent tolerance and low complication rate (AU)

Cancer testicular bilateral: presentación de cuatro casos / Bilateral testicular cancer: a report of four cases

El cáncer testicular bilateral suponen el 2-5 % de todos los tumores de testículo, aunque actualmente esa prevalencia va aumentando. La edad media de aparición es de los 15-35 años y el 75 % de ellos se presenta metacrónicamente. Suele haber hallazgos histológicos similares en ambos testículos, siendo el tipo histológico más frecuente el seminoma. El factor de riesgo más importante en el desarrollo del cancer testicular es la presencia de neoplasia intratubular de células germinales. El tratamiento de elección es la orquiectomía radical , aunque en algunos casos seleccionados se puede realizar una cirugía conservadora del testículo Presentamos 4 casos atendidos en nuestro servicio, analizamos los factores de riesgo, manejo de los tumores y realizamos una revisión de la literatura médica

Bilateral testicular cancer represents from 2 to 5 % of all testicle tumors, even though this prevalence nowadays is increasing. The median age of presentation was from 15 to years and in approximately 75 % of them occurred metachronously. There used to be concordance in histological findings between both testicles, being seminoma the most common histological type. The most important risk factor in the development of testicular cancer is the presence of intratubular germ cell neoplasia. Radical orquiectomy is the treatment to choose, although in some carefully selected patients testis-sparing surgery may be considered. We present four cases attended in our medical service, we analize the risk factors, management of tumors and a medical literature review is done

[Bilateral testicular cancer: a report of four cases]. / Cancer testicular bilateral: presentación de cuatro casos.

Bilateral testicular cancer represents from 2 to 5% of all testicle tumors, even though this prevalence nowadays is increasing. The median age of presentation was from 15 to years and in approximately 75% of them occurred metachronously. There used to be concordance in histological findings between both testicles, being seminoma the most common histological type. The most important risk factor in the development of testicular cancer is the presence of intratubular germ cell neoplasia. Radical orquiectomy is the treatment to choose, although in some carefully selected patients testis-sparing surgery may be considered. We present four cases attended in our medical service, we analize the risk factors, management of tumors and a medical literature review is done.