RESUMO
PURPOSE: We studied the cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) plus beta-radiation (Radiotherapy) vs. PCI alone for treating in-stent restenosis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We analyzed medical resource data collected at US sites during the Intimal Hyperplasia Inhibition with beta In-stent Trial (INHIBIT) to compare the incremental costs between Radiotherapy and PCI alone for each repeat target lesion revascularization (TLR) avoided. Costs were assigned for cardiac-related medical services using the Medicare payer perspective. RESULTS: Radiotherapy increased initial inpatient costs by US$3360 (P<.001). In the Radiotherapy and PCI alone groups, the mean per-patient rates for TLR were 0.13 vs. 0.30 (P=.001), and mean per-patient total costs were US$19,286 vs. US$18,349 (P<.001), respectively. The incremental cost of Radiotherapy relative to PCI alone was US$5512 per TLR avoided, which compares favorably to the observed mean per-patient cost of treating restenosis (US$16,852). CONCLUSIONS: beta-radiation is a cost-effective adjunct to PCI in treating patients with in-stent restenosis.
