Perioperative Outcomes of Transurethral Resection, Open Prostatectomy, and Laser Therapy in the Surgical Treatment of Benign Prostatic Obstruction: A "Real-World" Data Analysis from the URO-Cert Prostate Centers.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study is to compare length of hospital stay, transfusion rates, and re-intervention rates during hospitalization for transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P), open prostatectomy (OP), and laser therapy (LT) for surgical treatment of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). METHODS: URO-Cert is an organization, in which clinical data of prostatic diseases from 2 university, 19 public, and 3 private hospitals and 270 office-based urologists are collected in order to document treatment quality. Data on diagnostics, therapy, and course of disease are recorded web based. The analysis includes datasets from 2005 to 2017. RESULTS: Of 10,420 patients, 8,389 were treated with TUR-P, 1,334 with OP, and 697 with LT. Median length of hospital stay was 6 days (IQR: 4-7) for TUR-P, 9 days (IQR: 7-11) for OP, and 5 days (IQR: 4-6) for LT (p < 0.001). Risk for a hospital stay ≥7 days was higher for OP versus TUR-P (OR: 7.25; 95% CI = 6.27-8.36; p < 0.001) and LT (OR: 17.89; 95% CI = 14.12-22.65; p < 0.001) and higher for TUR-P versus LT (OR: 2.47; 95% CI = 2.03-3.01; p < 0.001). OP had a significantly higher risk for transfusions than TUR-P (OR: 2.44; 95% CI = 1.74-3.41; p < 0.001) and LT (OR: 3.32; 95% CI = 1.56-7.01; p < 0.001). Transfusion rates were not significantly different between TUR-P and LT (OR: 1.36; 95% CI = 0.66-2.79; p = 0.51). Risk of re-intervention was not different between all 3 approaches. CONCLUSION: OP was associated with higher transfusion rates and longer hospital stay than TUR-P and LT. Risk of transfusion was not different between TUR-P and LT, but TUR-P was inferior to LT concerning length of hospital stay. Re-intervention rates during hospitalization did not differ between the groups.

Effect of keratinocyte growth factor and activin on cell growth in the human prostatic cancer cell line LNCaP.

Keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) has paracrine properties in the human prostate which stimulate epithelial cell growth. Activins have profound effects on cell growth and function in the human prostate, and are expressed in LNCaP, DU 145 and PC3 cells. LNCaP cells were characterized by immuncytochemistry, an immunoassay and polymerase chain reaction. A 3[H]thymidine assay was used with 0.01-10 nM dihydrotestosterone, 10 micro M flutamide, 1-100 ng/ml KGF and 3 nM activin. LNCaP cells expressed Ki67, PSA, cytokeratins (8, 18, 19, 14, 15) androgenreceptor but no KGF protein. LNCaP cells showed telomerase activity. Furthermore, ARmRNA (365 bp), but no KGF or KGFRmRNA were expressed. KGF ELISA detected no intracellular or secreted KGF. DHT (1, 10 and 100 nM) and KGF (10 and 100 ng/ml) significantly stimulated LNCaP cell proliferation. However, flutamide and 3 nM activin A significantly decreased cell proliferation in the presence and absence of KGF. The results of our experiments support the hypothesis that cell growth and proliferative characteristics of LNCaP cells are modulated by KGF and activin A.

A prospective randomized study of combined visual laser ablation and transurethral resection of the prostate versus transurethral prostatectomy alone.

INTRODUCTION: Visual laser ablation of the prostate (VLAP) has a clinical failure rate of up to 18% which is 3 times higher than transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) alone. Prolonged spontaneous passage of necrotic debris is the major shortcoming of this method. Therefore combined visual laser-assisted and transurethral prostatectomy was compared to TURP alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 105 patients were evaluated in a prospective randomized study comparing TURP alone and VLAP combined with TURP. The patients were evaluated 1, 3 and 12 months after surgery. First VLAP was performed using a neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser with the prolase fiber followed by standard resection of the necrotic and remaining prostatic tissue. Treatment efficacy was assessed by the American Urological Association (AUA) symptom score, measurements of peak urinary flow, residual urine volume, intraoperative bleeding, and by the occurrence of intra- and postoperative complications. RESULTS: The use of VLAP and consecutive TURP improved the AUA symptom score, urinary flow and residual volume and was comparable in all patients treated. Intraoperative bleeding was significantly reduced from 522 +/- 45 ml by TURP to 214 +/- 33 ml by VLAP+TURP (p < 0.05). There was a significant improvement in the postoperative values of the parameters observed in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that the combined method for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia reduced the specific intraoperative morbidity of TURP while achieving the same clinical effect as TURP alone.