Evaluation of an online interactive Diabetes Needs Assessment Tool (DNAT) versus online self-directed learning: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Methods for the dissemination, understanding and implementation of clinical guidelines need to be examined for their effectiveness to help doctors integrate guidelines into practice. The objective of this randomised controlled trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of an interactive online Diabetes Needs Assessment Tool (DNAT) (which constructs an e-learning curriculum based on individually identified knowledge gaps), compared with self-directed e-learning of diabetes guidelines. METHODS: Health professionals were randomised to a 4-month learning period and either given access to diabetes learning modules alone (control group) or DNAT plus learning modules (intervention group). Participants completed knowledge tests before and after learning (primary outcome), and surveys to assess the acceptability of the learning and changes to clinical practice (secondary outcomes). RESULTS: Sixty four percent (677/1054) of participants completed both knowledge tests. The proportion of nurses (5.4%) was too small for meaningful analysis so they were excluded. For the 650 doctors completing both tests, mean (SD) knowledge scores increased from 47.4% (12.6) to 66.8% (11.5) [intervention group (n = 321, 64%)] and 47.3% (12.9) to 67.8% (10.8) [control group (n = 329, 66%)], (ANCOVA p = 0.186). Both groups were satisfied with the usability and usefulness of the learning materials. Seventy seven percent (218/284) of the intervention group reported combining the DNAT with the recommended reading materials was "very useful"/"useful". The majority in both groups (184/287, 64.1% intervention group and 206/299, 68.9% control group) [95% CI for the difference (-2.8 to 12.4)] reported integrating the learning into their clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: Both groups experienced a similar and significant improvement in knowledge. The learning materials were acceptable and participants incorporated the acquired knowledge into practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN: ISRCTN67215088.

Associations of glucose control with insulin sensitivity and pancreatic beta-cell responsiveness in newly presenting type 2 diabetes.

We examined the ability of indices of insulin sensitivity and pancreatic beta-cell responsiveness to explain interindividual variability of clinical measures of glucose control in newly presenting type 2 diabetes. Subjects with newly presenting type 2 diabetes (n = 65; 53 males and 12 females; age, 54 +/- 1 yr; body mass index, 30.5 +/- 0.7 kg/m(2); mean +/- SE) underwent an insulin-modified iv glucose tolerance test to determine minimal model-derived insulin sensitivity (S(I)), glucose effectiveness, first-phase insulin secretion, and disposition index. Subjects also underwent a standard meal tolerance test (MTT) to measure fasting/basal (M(0)) and postprandial (M(I)) pancreatic beta-cell responsiveness. Stepwise linear regression used these indices to explain interindividual variability of fasting and postprandial plasma glucose and insulin concentrations and glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1C)). All measures of pancreatic beta-cell responsiveness (M(0), M(I), and first-phase insulin secretion) were negatively correlated with fasting plasma glucose (P < 0.01) and positively correlated with fasting plasma insulin (FPI) and insulin responses to MTT (P < 0.05). S(I) demonstrated negative correlation with FPI (P < 0.001) but failed to correlate with any glucose variable. M(I) followed by disposition index (composite index of insulin sensitivity and pancreatic beta-cell responsiveness) were most informative in explaining interindividual variability. It was possible to explain 70-80% interindividual variability of fasting plasma glucose, FPI, HbA(1C), and insulin responses to MTT, and only 25-40% interindividual variability of postprandial glucose. In conclusion, postprandial insulin deficiency is the most powerful explanatory factor of deteriorating glucose control in newly presenting type 2 diabetes. Indices of insulin sensitivity and pancreatic beta-cell responsiveness explain fasting glucose and HbA(1C) well but fail to explain postprandial glucose.