Combining mental and physical stress: Synergy or interference?

Both cognitive stressors (such as mental arithmetic tasks) and physical stressors (such as the cold pressor test, CP) are among the most widely employed tools in acute stress research, and there is growing evidence for a high degree of stimulus-response specificity, rather than uniformity, in the human stress response. However, little is known about potential synergistic or interfering effects during concurrent administration. While cognitive tasks have been hypothesized to attenuate pain perception during CP, they are also thought to enhance physiological reactivity. Conversely, physical stress might interfere with effective stress induction by cognitive challenges. To address these questions, 56 participants underwent either the CP (3-min ice-water immersion of feet) or a warm-water control condition. In half of the sample, the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task (PASAT) was performed simultaneously (fully crossed interventions). Salivary cortisol, cardiovascular parameters, and subjective ratings as well as voice pitch (F0) were assessed. Results show that cortisol responses, self-reported pain and subjective arousal were mainly driven by cold exposure, which also led to increased F0. The PASAT incrementally enhanced cardiovascular reactions, but did not affect pain ratings nor cortisol responses to the CP. However, intra-individual concordance between elevated blood pressure and other reactivity measures was enhanced by PASAT administration during the CP. Importantly, performance decrements in the mental-arithmetic task were not associated with diminished stress responses. In conclusion, our results speak against any strong interference when administering cognitive and painful physical stressors simultaneously, pointing rather to specific additive effects, particularly regarding cardiovascular reactivity.

Acoustic startle reactivity while processing reward-related food cues during food deprivation: evidence from women in different menstrual cycle phases and men.

Previous research has shown that food deprivation enhances the acoustic startle reflex when it is elicited during presentation of visual food cues. Frustrative nonreward may explain this effect, since visual food cues are also rated to be more appetitive and arousing during food deprivation. However, the impact of menstrual cycle and sex on this effect remains unclear, and it is also not known whether this effect is influenced by hunger and motivation to eat. According to a within-study design, 20 healthy women in different menstrual cycle phases and 14 healthy men participated twice, in normal and food-deprived conditions. After 18 h of food deprivation, acoustic startle was attenuated by appetitive nonfood foreground pictures, but enhanced by presentation of food pictures. No differences between menstrual cycle phases and sexes appeared. The effect correlated with hunger changes, suggesting that motivational factors play a role.

Cold pressor stress affects cardiac attenuation of startle.

Stress may affect cardio-afferent neural traffic. We investigated whether acute autonomic stress has an impact on cardiac modulation of startle (CMS), a 'background' methodology for assessing baro-afferent signal transmission. Therefore, 38 healthy volunteers received acoustic startle stimuli (105 dB) at 6 different latencies relative to the R-wave (R +0, 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 ms; randomized order), both before and immediately after either a cold pressor (n = 19) or a control intervention (n = 19). Blood pressure was enhance d significantly in the cold pressor group right after the intervention (+13.7/5.7 mmHg), reflecting sustained autonomic activation after the stress procedure. Before stress, startle responses were lowest for latencies of R +200 and +300 ms, corroborating previous findings. After the cold pressor test, startle responsiveness was lowest for earlier latencies (R +0, +100 and +200 ms). Stress facilitation of pre-ejection baro-afferent traffic originating from atrial mechano-sensitive receptors may be associated with this time shift effect. We conclude that the cardiac modulation of startle is sensitive to altered temporal baro-afferent feedback characteristics induced by stress and autonomic activation.