Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont) ; 26 Spec No 2013: 34-42, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24860950

RESUMO

Early breast milk, known as colostrum ("liquid gold") provides immune benefits to infants, offering potential risk reduction for nosocomial infection (NI) and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), a serious gastrointestinal emergency. Provision of colostrum is recognized as oral immune therapy (OIT) and is valuable to all NICU infants unable to feed orally. A quality improvement project was initiated by the multidisciplinary NICU Quality Care Council at London Health Sciences Centres-Victoria (LHSC-VH) to obtain mothers' colostrum for early OIT. The initiative was driven by the Canadian EPIQ (Evidence-based Practice for Improving Quality) group as a means of reducing the rates of NEC and NI, two major morbidities in the NICU. The overall aim was to facilitate the availability of OIT to preterm and critically ill neonates as soon as possible after birth.


Assuntos
Colostro/imunologia , Infecção Hospitalar/imunologia , Infecção Hospitalar/enfermagem , Enterocolite Necrosante/imunologia , Enterocolite Necrosante/enfermagem , Imunoterapia/enfermagem , Doenças do Prematuro/imunologia , Doenças do Prematuro/enfermagem , Enfermagem Neonatal , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Administração Oral , Comportamento Cooperativo , Estado Terminal , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Enterocolite Necrosante/prevenção & controle , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Doenças do Prematuro/prevenção & controle , Mães/educação , Gravidez , Relações Profissional-Família
2.
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther ; 15(2): 142-6, 2010 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22477805

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to compare the use of opioid infusions to that proposed in guidelines published in an in-house medication handbook. Secondary objectives were to assess the documented use of a standardized neonatal pain assessment tool and to describe the supplemental use of opioids concurrent with an opioid infusion. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients in the NICU who received opioid infusions between November 1, 2005, and November 30, 2006. Data collected included patient characteristics, opioid infusion dosing and duration, supplemental opioid use, and pain assessment documentation. RESULTS: Of the110 neonates who received morphine or fentanyl during the study period, 65 patients met inclusion criteria. Reasons for starting an opioid infusion included nonsurgical sedation and/or analgesia (51%), postoperative pain (17%), and procedural pain (1%). No reason was documented for 31% of patients. Thirtyeight percent of neonates received a loading dose of opioid before initiation of the infusion. The median dose was 100 mcg/kg (IQR=48.2) for morphine and and 1 mcg/kg (IQR=0.8) for fentanyl. The mean ± SD starting rates of morphine and fentanyl infusions were 12.3 ± 4.7 mcg/kg/hr and 1.5 ± 1.7 mcg/kg/hr, respectively. Supplemental opioid doses were given to 46% of neonates during the infusion period. Supplemental doses were given for procedures (69%) and pain/agitation/sedation (26%). No reason was documented for 5% of patients. The Neonatal Pain, Agitation and Sedation Scale scores were only documented 9% of the time for each day that the patient received an opioid infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Dosing of opioids generally was within the recommendations that are described in the in-house medication handbook. A substantial percentage of neonates received supplemental opioid doses while on opioid infusions, mostly for procedural pain management. Documentation of the reason for using opioid infusions and the assessment of neonatal pain was poor.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...