Ultrasonic cardiac output monitor provides effective non-invasive bedside measurements of neonatal cardiac output.

This study determined the accuracy and validity for the haemodynamic parameters of haemodynamically stable neonates after postnatal circulatory adaptation using the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) in comparison with echocardiography. We conducted a prospective, observational study of neonates born at 23-41 weeks of gestation. They all underwent both echocardiography and USCOM assessments for comparison purposes. The 127 neonates were examined at the median of postmenstrual age of 35 weeks and there was a very high correlation between the cardiac output measurements provided by both methods. The mean difference in cardiac output was - 12 ± 25 ml/kg/min, with percentage error of 8.3 ± 6.9%. A larger bias was observed in cases with higher left ventricular output. Bland-Altman analysis confirmed no significant bias, with acceptable limits of agreement between these two methods. There was a very good correlation between the USCOM and echocardiographic methods when we used them to measure cardiac output in neonates.

Nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and CO2 removal: A randomized controlled crossover trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare short-term application of nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV) with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP). WORKING HYPOTHESIS: nHFOV improves CO2 removal with respect to nCPAP in preterm infants needing noninvasive respiratory support and persistent oxygen supply after the first 72 h of life. STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter non-blinded prospective randomized crossover study. PATIENT SELECTION: Thirty premature infants from eight tertiary neonatal intensive care units, of mean ± SD 26.4 ± 1.8 weeks of gestational age and 921 ± 177 g of birth weight. METHODOLOGY: Infants were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive a starting treatment mode of either nCPAP or nHFOV delivered by the ventilator CNO (Medin, Germany), using short binasal prongs of appropriate size. A crossover design with four 1-h treatment periods was used, such that each infant received both treatments twice. The primary outcome was the mean transcutaneous partial pressure of CO2 (TcCO2 ) value during the 2-h cumulative period of nHFOV compared with the 2-h cumulative period of nCPAP. RESULTS: Significantly lower TcCO2 values were observed during nHFOV compared with nCPAP: 47.5 ± 7.6 versus 49.9 ± 7.2 mmHg, respectively, P = 0.0007. A different TcCO2 behavior was found according to the random sequence: in patients starting on nCPAP, TcCO2 significantly decreased from 50.0 ± 8.0 to 46.6 ± 7.5 mmHg during nHFOV (P = 0.001). In patients starting on nHFOV, TcCO2 slightly increased from 48.5 ± 7.8 to 49.9 ± 6.7 mmHg during nCPAP (P = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: nHFOV delivered through nasal prongs is more effective than nCPAP in improving the elimination of CO2 .