Infarct exclusion repair of postmyocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture with a hybrid patch and septal occluder device compared with patch only.

Objective: We developed a hybrid technique for repairing post-myocardial infarction (MI) ventricular septal defect (VSD) that combines infarct exclusion with patch and a nitinol-mesh septal occluder device (SOD) to provide a scaffold to support the damaged septal wall. Here, we compare outcomes of patients with post-MI VSD repaired using patch only or hybrid patch/SOD. Methods: Patients undergoing post-MI VSD repair at our institution from 2013 to 2022 who received patch alone or patch/SOD repair were analyzed. Primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Clinical outcomes and echocardiograms were also analyzed. Results: Over a 9-year period, 24 patients had post-MI VSD repair at our institution with either hybrid patch/SOD (n = 10) or patch only repair (n = 14). VSD size was 18 ± 5.8 mm for patch/SOD and 17 ± 4.6 mm for patch only. In the patch/SOD repair cohort, average size of SOD implant was 23.6 ± 5.6 mm. Mild left ventricular dysfunction was present prerepair and was unchanged postrepair in both groups; however, moderate-to-severe right ventricular (RV) dysfunction was common in both groups before repair. RV function worsened or persisted as severe in 10% of hybrid versus 54% of patch-only patients postrepair. Tricuspid annular systolic excursion and RV:left ventricle diameter ratio, quantitative metrics of RV function, improved after patch/SOD repair. No intraoperative mortality occurred in either group. Postoperative renal, hepatic, and respiratory failure requiring tracheostomy was common in both groups. Survival to hospital discharge in both cohorts was 70%. Conclusions: Post-MI VSD repair with patch/SOD has comparable short-term outcomes with patch alone. Addition of a SOD to patch repair provides a scaffold that may enhance the repair of post-MI VSD with patch exclusion.

Improving patient outcomes with a mobile digital health platform for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

PURPOSE: ManageMySurgery (MMS) is a digital health application (app) for patients undergoing surgery, including Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR). Patients using MMS review procedure-specific education, view FAQs, and report patient-reported outcomes. This study assessed the impact of app use on postoperative outcomes. METHODS: Patients who underwent TAVR and invited to use MMS between March 2019 and November 2021 were identified. Patients received standard perioperative care and were defined as App users if they signed into the app at least once and engaged with at least one task or FAQ. Demographics and postoperative outcomes were collected via medical record review. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine odds of 90-day readmission, Emergency Room (ER) visits, and complications. RESULTS: 388 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 238 used the app. The average age at surgery was 76.4±7.7 years for users and 78.1±7.6 for non-users. 63.0% of users and 59.3% of non-users were male. App users had significantly lower 90-day readmission rates, (8.8% vs 16.0%, OR=0.51, p=0.0373), ER visit rates (12.6% vs 27.3%, OR=0.36, p=0.0003), and complication rates (Minor: 12.2% vs 20.7%, OR=0.48, P=0.0126; Major: 8.8% vs. 16%, OR=0.47, P=0.0235). CONCLUSIONS: In this non-randomized, retrospective study, we found significant decreases in 90-day readmissions, ER visits, and complications in TAVR patients using an app compared to traditional care. By engaging patients throughout their interventional journey with structured education and tasks, mobile health platforms may mitigate unnecessary use of emergency and inpatient care, thereby improving patient well-being and lowering the burden on healthcare resources.

Tailored approach and outcomes of aortic arch reconstruction after acute type A dissection repair.

OBJECTIVE: After limited root/ascending with or without hemiarch repair for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD), 20% to 30% of patients require distal reintervention, frequently for arch pathology. In this report, we describe an institutional algorithm for arch management after previous limited ATAAD repair and detail operative and long-term outcomes. METHODS: From August 2005 to April 2021, 71 patients status post previous limited ATAAD repair underwent reoperative arch repair involving zones 1 to 3 for aneurysmal degeneration of residual arch dissection including complete cervical debranching with zone 0/1 thoracic endovascular aortic repair in 6 (8%), open total arch in 13 (18%), type I hybrid arch repair in 23 (32%), and type II/III hybrid arch repair in 29 (41%). RESULTS: Mean age was 59 ± 12 years; time from index ATAAD repair to reoperation was 4 (interquartile range, 2-9) years. There were 2 (2.8%) in-hospital deaths and 2 (2.8%) postdischarge deaths within 30 days of surgery. Three patients suffered stroke (4.2%) and 2 (2.8%) had acute renal failure requiring dialysis. Overall Kaplan-Meier survival was 78%, 70%, and 58% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Institutional experience appeared to play a significant role in early and late outcomes, because there have been no operative mortalities in the past 9 years and improved survival of 87% versus 66%, 79% versus 58%, and 79% versus 40% at 1, 3, and 5 years in comparisons of the past 9 years with the previous era (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Aneurysmal degeneration of residual arch dissection after limited ATAAD repair presents a complex reoperative challenge. An algorithmic operative approach tailored to patient anatomy and comorbidities yields excellent early and late outcomes, which continue to improve with increasing institutional experience.

Selective Sinus Replacement for Aortic Root Aneurysm: Durable Approach in Selected Patients.

BACKGROUND: Selective sinus replacement (SSR) allows a tailored repair approach in patients with sinus of Valsalva or asymmetric aortic root aneurysm. SSR avoids the need for coronary reimplantation for nondiseased sinuses and shortens operative time, although potential for late growth of retained sinuses exists. This study describes selection of patients and assesses operative outcomes and late root dimensions after SSR. METHODS: From 2006 to 2020, 60 patients underwent SSR at a single referral institution. Mixed effect models were used to assess trajectory of postoperative growth of remaining sinuses, adjusting for age of the patient, valve morphology, and baseline root diameter. RESULTS: Median age of the patients was 57 (interquartile range [IQR], 48-65) years. Twenty-four (40%) had a bicuspid aortic valve. Most patients (n = 55 [92%]) underwent single sinus replacement (n = 46 noncoronary, n = 9 right), whereas 5 (8%) underwent repair of both the right and noncoronary sinuses. Concomitant aortic valve replacement was performed in 15 patients (25%); aortic valve repair with internal ring annuloplasty or cusp plication was performed in 37 (62%). There was no operative death, stroke, renal failure, or respiratory failure. Median preoperative root diameter was 53 mm (IQR, 51-56 mm) vs 42 mm (IQR, 39-45 mm) at median imaging follow-up of 34 (IQR, 13-49) months. Rate of midterm root growth was 0.2 mm/y, and there were no late root reinterventions. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with sinus of Valsalva or asymmetric root aneurysm, SSR is associated with excellent operative outcomes, and midterm follow-up suggests that the technique is durable. Longer term follow-up is needed to confirm continued stability of the aortic root.

Too big to fail?-An aggressive strategy for a dire problem.

Tracheo-innominate fistula (TIF) is a reported complication of tracheostomy that typically presents with a herald bleed. The phenomenon of an aortotracheal fistula has similar pathology and presentation to TIF, but no standard surgical repair. In the manuscript by Musgrove et al. in the Journal of Cardiac Surgery, the authors propose a surgical treatment that is reproducible for the correct anatomic configuration-an ascending and aortic arch replacement, pericardial patch of the tracheal defect, and omental flap coverage. While this intervention is a large undertaking for a small defect, it is a safe and durable repair.

Pain Trajectories After Valve Surgeries Performed via Midline Sternotomy Versus Mini-Thoracotomy.

OBJECTIVES: Controlling moderate-to-severe pain remains a major challenge after cardiothoracic surgery. Several outcomes have been compared extensively after valve surgery performed via midline sternotomy versus mini-thoracotomy, but postoperative pain (POP) was not adequately examined. Therefore, the authors tested the hypothesis that there is no difference in POP trajectories in patients undergoing valve surgery via midline sternotomy versus mini-thoracotomy. DESIGN: An Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study. SETTING: At a single, large academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients who underwent mitral or aortic valve surgeries over a 5-year period. INTERVENTIONS: The authors compared the characteristics of pain between valve surgery patients receiving either midline sternotomy or mini-thoracotomy. To identify pain score trajectories, the authors employed latent class linear mixed models and then used multinomial regression models to study the association between incision type and pain trajectory class. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The authors' cohort consisted of 1,660 surgical patients-544 (33%) received a midline sternotomy, and 1,116 (66%) received a mini-thoracotomy. The authors identified the following 4 pain trajectory classes: stationary, rapidly improving, slowly improving, and acute worsening pain. Compared to the rapidly improving class, the odds of belonging to the stationary (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] [95% CI] 1.45 [1.01- 2.08]; p = 0.04) or the acute worsening class (aOR [95% CI] 1.71 [1.10-2.67] p = 0.02) were significantly higher for sternotomy patients compared to mini-thoracotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Midline sternotomies are associated with higher odds of having an acute worsening or stationary versus a rapidly improving pain trajectory compared to mini-thoracotomies. Therefore, the choice of incision may play an important role in determining POP trajectory after valve surgery.

Feasibility study of a novel digital health platform for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

INTRODUCTION: Despite abundant evidence indicating that digital health solutions improve outcomes in chronic medical conditions, there are few validated solutions for acute surgical episodes. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a less invasive alternative to open surgery that is becoming more prevalent. We assessed the feasibility of ManageMySurgery (MMS), a smartphone application that combines patient education and outcomes tracking for patients undergoing TAVR procedures. METHODS: MMS was offered to patients receiving TAVR at an academic health center. Pre- and postoperatively, patients completed app-based tasks and reported clinical results using validated NYHA and KCCQ-12 surveys. Additionally, users reported levels of satisfaction with the digital platform. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were invited to use MMS, of which 43 (62%) downloaded and used the platform. The median age of patients was 77 years and 66.7% were male. The platform was accessed at an average of 2.6 times per user, with 79.1% of patients logging in one to three times. On average, 5.2 frequently asked questions were viewed. Of the 37 patients who completed the feedback survey (86%), 73.0% said it was helpful in preparation for surgery and 86.5% would recommend MMS to others. DISCUSSION: It is possible to utilize a digital health platform to guide patients undergoing TAVR through their interventional journey. Additional research is warranted to assess whether digital patient navigation tools provide an added benefit over traditional perioperative care alone, in terms of long-term patient engagement and outcomes.

When to Consider Deferral of Surgery in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Review.

BACKGROUND: Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a surgical emergency with an operative mortality of up to 30%, a rate that has not changed meaningfully in more than 2 decades. A growing body of research has highlighted several comorbidities and presenting factors in which delay or permanent deferral of surgery may be considered; however, modern comprehensive summative reviews are lacking. The urgency and timing of this review are underscored by significant challenges in resource use posed by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This review provides an update on the current understanding of risk assessment, surgical candidacy, and operative timing in patients with ATAAD. METHODS: A literature search was conducted through PubMed and Embase databases to identify relevant studies relating to risk assessment in ATAAD. Articles were selected by group consensus on the basis of quality and relevance. RESULTS: Several patient factors have been identified that increase risk in ATAAD repair. In particular, frailty, advanced age, previous cardiac surgery, and use of novel anticoagulant medications have been studied. The understanding of malperfusion syndromes has also expanded significantly, including recommendations for surgical delay. Finally, approaches to triage have been significantly influenced by resource limitations related to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Although medical management remains a reasonable option in carefully selected patients at prohibitive risk for open surgery, endovascular therapies for treatment of ATAAD are rapidly evolving. CONCLUSIONS: Early surgical repair remains the preferred treatment for most patients with ATAAD. However, improvements in risk stratification should guide appropriate delay or permanent deferral of surgery in select individuals.

It's not you, It's me: The influence of patient and surgeon gender on patient satisfaction scores.

BACKGROUND: Surgeons face the unique challenge of being responsible for both clinical encounters and surgical outcomes. We aim to explore how patient evaluations of surgeons may be influenced by patient and provider factors. METHODS: Patient responses from the 2016 CGCAHPS survey at a single institution were identified. A Poisson regression model was used to identify patient/provider factors associated with ratings. RESULTS: 11,007 surveys of 134 surgeons were included. After adjustment, higher overall surgeon ratings were associated with older patient age (p < 0.001) and male patient gender (p = 0.001). Lower ratings were associated with higher patient education (p < 0.001) and lower patient self-health ratings (p < 0.001). Although female surgeons tended to have higher communication scores, overall scores did not differ based on any surgeon factors. CONCLUSIONS: Patient satisfaction scores of surgeons are more closely correlated with patient variables than surgeon factors. This may have implications for physician performance evaluation in value-based care models.

Permissive Hypertension and Collateral Revascularization May Allow Avoidance of Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage in Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.

BACKGROUND: The utility of cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) for prevention of spinal cord ischemia (SCI) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) remains unclear. We previously published our institutional algorithm restricting preoperative CSFD to patients deemed high risk for SCI. Since that publication, our algorithm has evolved with preoperative CSFD avoided in all patients undergoing isolated descending TEVAR with or without arch involvement (+/- arch TEVAR). This study evaluated the updated algorithm in a contemporary cohort. METHODS: Patients who underwent TEVAR for descending aortic +/-arch pathology between February 2012 and September 2018 at a single center were identified from an institutional aortic surgery database. The algorithm includes left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization in cases of coverage with no preservation of antegrade flow, permissive hypertension, and use of evoked potential monitoring. The primary end points were SCI or postoperative CSFD. RESULTS: During the study interval, 225 patients underwent descending +/- arch TEVAR. CSFD was used before TEVAR in 2 patients (0.9%) in violation of the algorithm, and they were excluded from the study cohort. Endograft coverage below T6 occurred in 81%. The LSA was fully covered in 100 patients (47%), all of whom underwent LSA revascularization. Following the updated algorithm, the incidence of temporary or permanent SCI was 0%. No patient required postoperative CSFD. CONCLUSIONS: A restrictive lumbar CSFD algorithm, including permissive hypertension and LSA revascularization in the setting of descending +/- arch TEVAR, appears safe, with a 0% incidence of SCI in 223 consecutive patients treated during a 6.5-year interval. We recommend consideration of further prospective study to evaluate this algorithm.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for patients with severe bicuspid aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis (BAV) were excluded from all the trileaflet aortic valve stenosis (TAV) pivotal trials, and therefore, their outcomes are not clearly defined. The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with BAV and compared them with those of TAV. METHODS: We evaluated the outcomes following TAVR of patients with BAV at our institution between April 2011 and November 2016 and compared them with the outcomes of patients with TAV treated with TAVR. The χ2 and the Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare the groups, and a Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to estimate long-term survival. RESULTS: TAVR was performed in a total of 567 patients, from which 50 (8.8%) had BAV and 517 (91.2%) had TAV. Patients with BAV were younger and had higher prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lower prevalence of coronary artery disease, higher body mass index, and lower Society of Thoracic Surgeons score (STS PROM). Patients with BAV had a slightly higher mean aortic valve gradient postoperatively (median 12 mm Hg [10-15] vs 10 [7-13], P < .001), but paravalvular aortic regurgitation was not different between the groups (> mild 4.0% vs 3.5%, P = .541). Clinical outcomes were not different between the groups, including stroke (2.0% vs 1.5, P = .567) and the 30-day all-cause mortality (6.0% vs 1.5, P = .064). The 2-year survival (82.0% vs 83.4, P = .476) was similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: This initial experience suggests that TAVR can be safely performed in patients with BAV, achieving similar short-term procedural and clinical outcomes when compared with patients with TAV.

Valvular Disease in Marfan Syndrome: Surgical Considerations and Management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Detail the current strategies for the management of valve dysfunction in Marfan syndrome (MFS), understand the limitations of surgical interventions, and delineate the likely direction of future innovations. RECENT FINDINGS: Significant advances in both medical and surgical management of MFS have been made over the last 50 years. This has resulted in improved overall outcomes. As MFS patients age, new clinical challenges that were once rare have emerged and can require complex care strategies. Medical management has seen advances and focuses on anti-impulse and molecular-based pharmacotherapy, along with close monitoring with serial imaging to minimize acute aortic dissection risk by selecting appropriate timing of prophylactic surgical intervention with increasing aortic dimensions. Ongoing trials are evaluating other potential drug therapies with the ultimate goal of targeted treatment. Over the last 50 years, significant advances have been made in the understanding and management of MFS. A move to prophylactic surgery for aortopathy and valve disease has progressed from a valve replacement to a valve-sparing strategy in many cases. However, the durability of these repairs is variable and the possibility of reintervention looms.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for the ascending aorta: experience and pitfalls.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of the ascending aorta is a developing alternative treatment strategy, which currently is specifically aimed at patients who are too high risk for open surgery. TEVAR has been applied to patients with a variety of pathologies of the ascending aorta including type A dissection, intramural hematoma (IMH), penetrating ulcers, aneurysm and pseudoaneurysm. Here we discuss the current evidence regarding the use of TEVAR for the ascending aorta as well as the latest techniques and pitfalls of the procedure. The challenges of this modality are considerable, and the techniques that have been applied draw from the many facets of endovascular experience. There is limited literature regarding the use of stent grafts in the ascending aorta, and the pool of patients currently considered appropriate candidates for the procedure is small. This is an evolving intervention that warrants further study and the development of devices specifically engineered to meet the anatomical and physiologic challenges of the ascending aorta.

Acute DeBakey Type I Dissection Repair Using Frozen Elephant Trunk: The Cleveland Clinic Technique.

Over the past 3 decades, the standard surgical management for acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection has not significantly changed. Most patients undergo ascending aortic replacement with an interposition graft under hypothermic circulatory arrest with selective root replacement. Nevertheless, with the improvement in overall patient care, acute surgical outcomes continue to improve. The frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique was introduced as a modification to conventional elephant trunk to treat extensive degenerative and chronic dissecting aneurysms involving the aortic arch and the proximal descending aorta. The FET technique converts the conventional elephant trunk procedure-an inherently 2-stage operation-into a 1-stage repair in selected patients and greatly facilitates more distal aortic repair, for others. The surgical strategy is tailored to address individual pathology, based on each patient's aortic anatomy and disease. FET technique in acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection extends the surgical repair into and beyond the arch with the potential to address some of the limitations of the conventional type I aortic dissection repair, but it has not been widely adopted yet. Only a limited number of institutions have embraced this modality during the acute phase of aortic dissection out of concern that it may be too complicated during an emergency situation. We have developed a simplified technique that has evolved over the past several years and the purpose of this report is to describe it.

An Alternative Technique for Hemiarch Replacement Without Using Deep Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest.

We describe an alternate technique to perform a replacement of the aortic hemiarch without the need for hypothermic circulatory arrest by axillary cannulation and arch vessel isolation. In 2015, 3 patients underwent hemiarch reconstructions for ascending aortic aneurysms that extended into the arch. Each was performed using right axillary cannulation, isolation and clamping of the innominate artery with isolation, and tangential clamping of the aorta distal to the innominate. There were no neurologic events and no perioperative morbidity or mortality.

Current management of aortic arch lesions with hybrid procedures: a tailored approach to a progressive disease.

In the current era of cardiac and aortic surgery lines between open and endovascular approaches are becoming blurred. Hybrid techniques emerged with the availability of endovascular devices and the idea that combining open operations with a stent graft might provide a treatment option to those patients deemed too high-risk for conventional surgery. As these procedures evolved, it became clear that they still carried significant risk especially for the "inoperable" or "high-risk" patients, but they also offered new options for treating complex pathologies involving multiple segments of the aorta. Hybrid techniques not only provide the potential for less invasive aortic repair, but must be considered as an important complementary treatment option for patients with aortic disease, allowing for a potentially more effective and complete repair. The objective of this article is to review the current options for hybrid arch repair and the indications for choosing the various techniques based on pathologic presentation.

A small molecular activator of cardiac hypertrophy uncovered in a chemical screen for modifiers of the calcineurin signaling pathway.

The calcium, calmodulin-dependent phosphatase calcineurin, regulates growth and gene expression of striated muscles. The activity of calcineurin is modulated by a family of cofactors, referred to as modulatory calcineurin-interacting proteins (MCIPs). In the heart, the MCIP1 gene is activated by calcineurin and has been proposed to fulfill a negative feedback loop that restrains potentially pathological calcineurin signaling, which would otherwise lead to abnormal cardiac growth. In a high-throughput screen for small molecules capable of regulating MCIP1 expression in muscle cells, we identified a unique 4-aminopyridine derivative exhibiting an embedded partial structural motif of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT). This molecule, referred to as pyridine activator of myocyte hypertrophy, acts as a selective agonist for 5-HT(2A/2B) receptors and induces hypertrophy of cardiac muscle cells through a signaling pathway involving calcineurin and a kinase-dependent mechanism that inactivates class II histone deacetylases, which act as repressors of cardiac growth. These findings identify MCIP1 as a downstream target of 5-HT(2A/2B) receptor signaling in cardiac muscle cells and suggest possible uses for 5-HT(2A/2B) agonists and antagonists as modulators of cardiac growth and gene expression.