Effects of acute psychological stress induced in laboratory on physiological responses in asthma populations: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Psychological stress has long been suspected to have a deleterious effect on asthma, with acute psychological stress being associated with physiological responses in asthma patients. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this systematic review was to provide a narrative synthesis of the impact of acute laboratory psychological stress on physiological responses among asthma patients. METHODS: An extensive search was conducted by two independent authors using Pubmed, PsycINFO, PsyArticles and the Cochrane Library electronic databases (up to September 2016). English and French articles which assessed physiological responses during or post-stress and compare them to baseline or pre-stress values were included. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies indicated that exposure to active stressors (e.g., arithmetic tasks) was associated with an increase in sympathetic nervous system (SNS) responses, cortisol, and inflammatory responses, but had little effect on the caliber of the bronchi. Exposure to passive stressors (e.g., watching stressful movies or pictures) was also associated with an increase in SNS responses and with mild bronchoconstriction. However, a paucity of data for passive stressors limited conclusions on other measures. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with asthma, both active and passive stressors seem to be associated with an increased activation of the SNS. Passive stressors seem to have a more immediate, deleterious impact on the airways than active stressors, but the latter may be associated with delayed inflammatory driven an asthma exacerbation. Further studies are needed to understand the impact of acute stressors on the physiological mechanisms associated with asthma, particularly HPA and immune markers. Systematic review registration number: CRD42015026431.

Optimizing screening for depression among adults with asthma.

OBJECTIVE: The Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) is one of the most frequently used tools to screen for depression in patients with chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease and asthma. However, its original cut-off score has not been validated in adult asthmatics. The present study aimed to determine the optimal BDI-II cut-off score and to verify the impact of various patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics on performance accuracy of the BDI-II. METHODS: A total of 801 adult asthmatic outpatients (mean ± SD, age 49 ± 14 years, 60% female) completed the BDI-II and a structured psychiatric interview (used as the standard referent to determine presence of major depressive disorder [MDD]). The sensitivity and specificity of the BDI-II were computed to determine the optimal cut-off score for identifying MDD. The optimal cut-off scores were also verified across covariate subgroups (e.g., sex, age, smoking status, asthma control levels). RESULTS: According to the structured psychiatric interview, 108 (13%) patients had current MDD. The overall optimal BDI-II cut-off score was 12 (sensitivity = 85%, specificity = 79%). However, subgroup analyses revealed that this score could range from 11 to 15 depending on the characteristics of the individual. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that the BDI-II is an appropriate screening tool for MDD in asthma populations. However, the cut-off score is influenced by the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients. These findings highlight the importance of validating generic questionnaires for depression in specific populations in order to improve the accuracy of their usage.

Beck Depression Inventory II: determination and comparison of its diagnostic accuracy in cardiac outpatients.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of covariates on performance accuracy of the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) and to determine the optimal cut-off score for the BDI-II in cardiac outpatients. Differences of optimal cut-off scores were also verified across covariate subgroups. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective cross-sectional study at the Department of Nuclear Medicine of the Montreal Heart Institute (Quebec, Canada). METHODS: A total of 750 adult cardiac outpatients (mean ± SD age 58 ± 10 years, 31% women) completed the BDI-II and the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD; a psychiatric interview used as the reference standard for determining diagnosis of major depressive disorder). The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve of the BDI-II was adjusted for age, sex, level of education, smoking status, obesity, anxiety disorder, psychotropic medication, and history of coronary artery disease. The ROC analyses were conducted to determine optimal cut-off scores. RESULTS: Forty-two (6%) patients met criteria for current major depressive disorder according to the PRIME-MD. After adjusted for covariates, the area under the ROC curve was significantly smaller than the unadjusted curve (0.76, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.85 vs. 0.84, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.89; ΔAUC = -0.07, 95% CI -0.13 to -0.02). While the optimal cut-off score was 10 for the total sample (sensitivity 83%, specificity 73%), the analyses indicated different cut-off scores across covariate subgroups: e.g. sex (women 13; men 10), and anxiety disorders (yes 15; no 10). CONCLUSIONS: BDI-II is a good screening instrument for depression in cardiac outpatients. However, the present results suggest that covariates can affect the classification accuracy of the BDI-II's original recommended cut-off score. Scholars and clinicians should be aware of the principle that a screening score established in one population may not be relevant to another.

Hemodynamic, hemostatic, and endothelial reactions to acute psychological stress in depressed patients following coronary angiography.

Although there is evidence that depression is associated with an increased risk for coronary artery disease (CAD), the mechanisms underlying this association remain unclear. This study examined the association between depression and hemodynamic, hemostatic, and endothelial responses to psychological stress. Seventy-two postcoronary angiography patients completed a mental stress task. Blood pressure, heart rate, and impedance cardiography were recorded at rest and during the task. Blood samples were taken at the end of rest and immediately after the task. Depression was evaluated using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule Self-Administered (DISSA). In total, 21% of the participants were depressed. Analyses revealed that depression was associated with blunted pre-ejection period stress reactivity and with increased platelet factor 4 reactivity. These data provide potential mechanistic pathways linking depression to increased CAD.

The influence of endothelial function and myocardial ischemia on peak oxygen consumption in patients with coronary artery disease.

Impaired endothelial function has been shown to limit exercise in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients and has been implicated in myocardial ischemia. However, the association of endothelial function and ischemia on peak exercise oxygen consumption (VO(2)) has not been previously reported. A total of 116 CAD patients underwent standard exercise stress testing, during which VO(2) was measured. On a separate day, endothelial-dependent and -independent function were assessed by ultrasound using flow-mediated arterial vasodilation (FMD) and sublingual glyceryl trinitrate administration (GTNMD) of the brachial artery. Patients with exercise-induced myocardial ischemia had lower FMD than nonischemic patients (3.64 ± 0.57 versus 4.98 ± 0.36, P = .050), but there was no difference in GTNMD (14.11 ± 0.99 versus 15.47 ± 0.63, P = .249). Analyses revealed that both FMD (P = .006) and GTNMD (P = .019) were related to peak VO(2). However, neither the presence of ischemia (P = .860) nor the interaction of ischemia with FMD (P = .382) and GTNMD (P = .151) was related to peak VO(2). These data suggest that poor endothelial function, potentially via impaired NO production and smooth muscle dysfunction, may be an important determinant of exercise capacity in patients with CAD, independent of myocardial ischemia.

Individual and combined impact of cigarette smoking, anxiety, and mood disorders on asthma control.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the availability of effective therapies, research indicates that more than 50% of asthmatics are poorly controlled. Poor asthma control has been linked to behavioral (i.e., cigarette smoking) and psychological factors (i.e., anxiety and depression). However, little is known about the individual versus combined impact of cigarette smoking and anxiety or mood disorders in adult asthmatics on asthma control. METHODS: A total of 796 confirmed adult asthma patients completed a sociodemographic and medical history interview and underwent a psychiatric interview using the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Asthma control was evaluated using the Asthma Control Questionnaire. RESULTS: After adjusting for age, sex, and dose of inhaled corticosteroids, general linear model analyses indicated a significant main effect of current smoking on asthma control (B [SE] = 0.156 [0.059], p = .008) and main effects of anxiety disorders (B [SE] = 0.408 [0.095], p = < .001) and mood disorders (B [SE] = 0.448 [0.098], p = < .001) on asthma control. Pack-years were not associated with asthma control, and there were no interaction effects of current smoking or pack-years with either anxiety or mood disorders on asthma control. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that current smoking, having an anxiety disorder, and having a mood disorder are independently associated with poorer asthma control but that cumulative smoking history (i.e., pack-years) was not associated with worse asthma control. These results indicate that smoking cessation may have a positive impact on asthma control levels in spite of past smoking intensity and highlight the importance of interventions that target anxiety and mood disorders in adult asthmatics.

Association between generalized anxiety disorder and asthma morbidity.

BACKGROUND: Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is common among people with asthma, but its association with asthma morbidity remains unexplored. This study examined cross-sectional associations between GAD and asthma control, quality of life, and self-efficacy. METHODS: Seven hundred ninety-four adults with confirmed asthma were recruited from the outpatient clinic of a university hospital. Patients underwent a sociodemographic and medical history interview (to assess health service use and medications), followed by a brief psychiatric interview (Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders) to assess GAD. Patients completed questionnaires assessing asthma control, quality of life, and asthma self-efficacy and underwent spirometry. General linear models and logistic regression were used to assess associations between GAD and asthma morbidity measures, adjusting for covariates. RESULTS: GAD affected 4% of the sample. The analyses revealed significant associations between GAD and worse overall asthma control (ß = 0.62, standard error [SE] = 0.18, p < .001), increased bronchodilator use (ß = 10.60, SE = 2.64, p < .001), worse asthma quality of life (ß = -0.91, SE = 0.23, p < .001), and worse asthma self-efficacy (ß = -59.56, SE = 13.59, p < .001) after the adjustment for covariates. Separate sensitivity analyses including major depressive disorder and asthma self-efficacy as additional covariates rendered many of these associations nonsignificant. There were no associations between GAD and emergency visits or hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: GAD is associated with worse asthma morbidity independent of age, sex, smoking, and asthma severity; however, comorbid major depressive disorder and low asthma self-efficacy may account for many of these associations. Only breathlessness and the frequency of bronchodilator use were uniquely associated with GAD. Future research should examine whether treatment of GAD can affect asthma outcomes.