Phase 1/2 study of DFP-10917 administered by continuous intravenous infusion in patients with recurrent or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

BACKGROUND: DFP-10917, a deoxycytidine nucleoside analogue, has a unique mechanism of action resulting in leukemic cell death when administered for prolonged periods at low doses. The current phase 1/2 study investigated the safety, maximum tolerated dose, and evidence of antileukemic activity for DFP-10917 administered by 7-day or 14-day continuous intravenous infusion in patients with recurrent or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML). METHODS: In the phase 1 dose escalation portion of the study, patients were administered DFP-10917 by 7-day continuous intravenous infusion plus 21-day rest (stage 1) or 14-day continuous intravenous infusion plus 14-day rest (stage 2). The primary objectives of phase 1 were to determine the maximum tolerated dose, the phase 2 dose, and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of DFP-10917. The primary objectives of phase 2 were to evaluate the overall response rate of DFP-10917 using complete response (CR), CR without platelet recovery (CRp), CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) or partial response. RESULTS: In stage 1 of phase 1 (4-35 mg/m2 /day as a 7-day continuous intravenous infusion), a DLT of grade 3 diarrhea occurred at a dose of 35 mg/m2 /day. In stage 2 of phase 1, a dose of 10 mg/m2 /day as a 14-day continuous intravenous infusion resulted in DLTs of prolonged hypocellularity, abdominal pain, diarrhea, and vomiting. The dose of 6 mg/m2 /day as a 14-day continuous intravenous infusion was found to be well tolerated and was selected for phase 2. Response rates in patients in phase 2 (N = 29) were 20.7% CR, 3.4% CRp, and 24.1% CRi. The overall response rate was 48.3% (95% confidence interval, 29.4%-67.5%). CONCLUSIONS: DFP-10917 as a 14-day continuous intravenous infusion at a dose of 6 mg/m2 /day can be administered safely and appears to be effective in patients with recurrent or refractory AML. A phase 3 investigation comparing DFP-10917 monotherapy versus standard of care in an early recurrent or refractory AML setting is warranted.

A phase I study of fludarabine, cytarabine, and oxaliplatin therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

PURPOSE: The combination of cytarabine and fludarabine was associated with superior clinical outcomes compared with those of high-dose cytarabine in relapse acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We conducted a phase I study combining oxaliplatin with cytarabine and fludarabine therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory AML. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2008 and November 2009, 27 patients were registered in the study. Patients had histologically confirmed disease, performance status 0 to 2, and adequate organ function. The treatment regimen consisted of increasing doses of oxaliplatin (25, 30, or 35 mg/m(2)/d) on days 1 to 4 (escalation phase), and fludarabine (30 mg/m²) and cytarabine (500 mg/m²) on days 2 to 6, every 28 days for ≤ 6 cycles. The dose-limiting toxicity was defined as any symptomatic grade ≥ 3 nonhematologic toxicity lasting ≥ 3 days and involving a major organ system. RESULTS: Of 27 patients, 12 were treated in the dose-escalation phase and 15 at the maximum tolerated dose for oxaliplatin (30 mg/m²; expansion phase). All patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. Only 1 patient received the second cycle; the remaining patients received no further study treatment, owing to slow recovery from toxicities or physician decision. Grade 3-4 drug-related toxicities included diarrhea (grade 4) and elevated levels of bilirubin (grade 3) and aspartate transaminase (grade 3). In all, 3 patients had a complete remission and 2 patients complete response without platelet recovery. CONCLUSION: Oxaliplatin, cytarabine, and fludarabine therapy had antileukemic activity in patients with poor-risk AML, but it was associated with toxicity. Different schedules and doses may be better tolerated.

A phase I study of pemetrexed in patients with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia.

PURPOSE: To investigate the toxicity profile, activity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of pemetrexed in leukemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with refractory or relapsed acute leukemia were eligible. A phase I 3+3 design was implemented. Pemetrexed was infused intravenously (IV) over 25 min with vitamin supplementation. Courses were repeated every 3 to 4 weeks according to toxicity and efficacy. The starting dose of 900 mg/m² was escalated by approximately 33% until the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was determined. RESULTS: Twenty patients with acute myeloid (AML) or lymphocytic (ALL) leukemia received therapy. The main non-hematologic adverse event was liver dysfunction at several dose levels, including 2 DLTs at 3,600 mg/m². One patient with ALL (3,600 mg/m² dose level) achieved a partial response. Pemetrexed pharmacokinetics were linear with escalated dosing. Elevated plasma deoxyuridine was observed in a subset of patients following pemetrexed infusion, but was not correlated with dose levels. Changes in the nucleotide pools of circulating mononuclear cells were observed, but were variable. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended phase II dose of pemetrexed for future leukemia studies is 2,700 mg/m(2) IV over 25 min every 3 to 4 weeks with vitamin supplementation. Deoxyuridine levels did not increase with increasing pemetrexed dose, suggesting pemetrexed inhibition of thymidylate synthase (TS) may be saturated by the 900 mg/m² dose level. However, no firm conclusion can be made regarding TS saturation in tumor cells. While tolerable, pemetrexed monotherapy had limited activity in this highly refractory population. Exploration of pemetrexed in combination with other active agents in leukemia is a reasonable future endeavor.

Treatment of core-binding-factor in acute myelogenous leukemia with fludarabine, cytarabine, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor results in improved event-free survival.

BACKGROUND: Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) associated with core-binding-factor (CBF) abnormalities is the type of leukemia most responsive to cytarabine (ara-C) therapy and is of relative favorable prognosis. In vitro and ex vivo observations suggest that increases in intracellular ara-C levels influenced by administration of fludarabine and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) increase the effect of ara-C, prompting us to clinically evaluate the efficacy of such combinations. METHODS: We analyzed the event-free survival of patients with newly diagnosed CBF AML treated with fludarabine and ara-C (FA) (N = 45) or with FA and GCSF (FLAG) (N = 22) and compared results to patients treated with regimens consisting of idarubicin and ara-C with or without GCSF (IA/IAG) (N = 47). RESULTS: After accounting for prognostic covariates other than treatment (including year in which treatment was administered), FA, and in particular FLAG, were associated with longer event-free survival than IA/IAG. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, our data lends clinical credence to the observed modulation of ara-C by fludarabine and GCSF.