RESUMO
Fever is the most common complaint of children who are attending a pediatric emergency department (PED). Most of the fever cases are of viral origin; however, the most common markers, such as leucocyte, neutrophil count, or C-reactive protein, are not sensitive or specific enough to distinguish the etiology of fever, especially if children present at the early phase of infection. Currently, platelets have been attributed a role as important sentinels in viral and bacterial infection pathogenesis. Thus, our aim was to analyze different platelet indices, such as PNLR (platelet-to-neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio), PNR (platelet-to-neutrophil ratio) as well as specific secreted proteins, such as sP-selectin, CXCL4, CXCL7, and serotonin. We included 68 children who were referred to PED with the early onset of fever (<12 h). All children with comorbidities, older than five years, and psychiatric diseases, who refused to participate were excluded. All the participants were divided into viral, bacterial, or serious bacterial infection (SBI) groups. All the children underwent blood sampling, and an additional sample was collected for protein analysis. Our analysis revealed statistically significant differences between leucocyte, neutrophil, and CRP levels between SBI and other groups. However, leucocyte and neutrophil counts were within the age norms. A higher PNLR value was observed in a bacterial group, PNR-in viral. As we tested CXCL7 and sP-selectin, alone and together those markers were statistically significant to discriminate SBI and sepsis from other causes of infection. Together with tachypnoe and SpO2 < 94%, it improved the prediction value of sepsis as well as SBI. CXCL4 and serotonin did not differ between the groups. Concluding, CXCL7 and sP-selectin showed promising results in early SBI and sepsis diagnosis.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The goal of this literature review is to compare current studies regarding the accuracy of different serum markers in differentiating viral from bacterial pneumonia in the pediatric population with what is employed in the medical settings at present. Currently there is still a lack of significant research, that would give us evaluation on biomarkers benefits towards getting a definite diagnosis of pneumonia. Finding out the potential of biomarkers to differentiate between viral and bacterial pneumonia is also important because knowing the exact pathogen would prevent irrational use of antibiotics. At present, irrational, broad-spectrum antibiotic use and increasing antibiotic resistance in microorganisms are still one of the greatest challenges in clinical settings. The use of biomarkers in clinical practice would not only facilitate accurate diagnosis, but would also help to reduce the amount of antibiotics overuse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Literature search conducted on Medline and Google Scholar using a combination of terms. Articles that were in English and within ten years of the search date were manually sorted according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS: Initial search returned n = 13,408. After activating filters, n = 140 were identified of which n = 12 included for literature review. CONCLUSIONS: Rise or drop in the concentration of a single marker is not accurate enough for predicting viral/bacterial community acquired pneumonia. This is because there is overlapping to a varying extent depending on the marker cut-off values, detection methods, analyses, the desired specificity, and sensitivity. Furthermore, the presence of mixed infection makes almost all markers suboptimal to be used universally. New markers such as MxA1 and HMGB1 gave promising results. However, to replicate a similar testing condition in a clinical environment may not be practical. Another approach is to make use of more than one marker and combine with clinical signs and symptoms. This may not be cost-effective in many clinical settings; nevertheless, in many studies, marker combination greatly improved the predictive power.
