Estimating ventilation correlation coefficients in the lungs using PREFUL-MRI in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients and healthy adults.

PURPOSE: Various parameters of regional lung ventilation can be estimated using phase-resolved functional lung (PREFUL)-MRI. The parameter "ventilation correlation coefficient (Vent-CC)" was shown advantageous because it assesses the dynamics of regional air flow. Calculating Vent-CC depends on a voxel-wise comparison to a healthy reference flow curve. This work examines the effect of placing a reference region of interest (ROI) in various lung quadrants or in different coronal slices. Furthermore, algorithms for automated ROI selection are presented and compared in terms of test-retest repeatability. METHODS: Twenty-eight healthy subjects and 32 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients were scanned twice using PREFUL-MRI. Retrospective analyses examined the homogeneity of air flow curves of various reference ROIs using cross-correlation. Vent-CC and ventilation defect percentage (VDP) calculated using various reference ROIs were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The coefficient of variation was calculated for Vent-CC and VDP when using different reference selection algorithms. RESULTS: Flow-volume curves were highly correlated between ROIs placed at various lung quadrants in the same coronal slice (r > 0.97) with no differences in Vent-CC and VDP (ANOVA: p > 0.5). However, ROIs placed at different coronal slices showed lower correlation coefficients and resulted in significantly different Vent-CC and VDP values (ANOVA: p < 0.001). Vent-CC and VDP showed higher repeatability when calculated using the presented new algorithm. CONCLUSION: In COPD and healthy cohorts, assessing regional ventilation dynamics using PREFUL-MRI in terms of the Vent-CC metric showed higher repeatability using a new algorithm for selecting a homogenous reference ROI from the same slice.

Arthroscopic defect size measurement in osteochondral lesions of the talus underestimates the exact defect size and size measurement with arthro-MRI (MR-A) and high-resolution flat-panel CT-arthro imaging (FPCT-A).

PURPOSE: The size of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs) is highly relevant for their treatment. In addition to intraoperative measurement of defect size, preoperative planning by means of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) is crucial. METHODS: Four defects of different sizes and depths were created on the talar joint surface in 14 cadaver feet. All defects were evaluated, both arthroscopically and via arthrotomy with a probe. Arthro-MRI (MR-A) and high-resolution flat-panel CT arthro scans (FPCT-A) were acquired. Length, width, and depth were measured for every defect and the defect volume was calculated. To determine the exact defect size, each talar defect was filled with plastic pellets to form a cast and the casts were scanned using FPCT to create a 3D multiplanar reconstruction data set. Finally, the surgically measured values were compared with the radiological values and the exact defect size. RESULTS: Overall, the surgically measured values (both arthroscopic and open) underestimated the exact defect size (p < 0.05). Arthroscopically determined defect length and width showed the largest deviation (p < 0.05) and underestimated the size in comparison with MR-A and FPCT-A. The FPCT-A measurements demonstrated higher correlation with both the arthroscopic and open surgical measurements than did the MR-A measurements (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The exact defect size is underestimated on intraoperative measurement, in both arthroscopic and open approaches. Arthroscopic defect size measurement underestimates defect size in comparison with MR-A and FPCT-A. FPCT-A was shown to be a reliable imaging technique that allows free image reconstruction in every plane and could be considered as the new reference standard for preoperative evaluation of defect size in OLT.

Direct measurement of malrotation of traumatic femoral neck fractures after osteosynthesis: Introduction of a novel method and interrater reliability.

BACKGROUND: In elderly patients, displaced femoral neck fractures are mostly treated by arthroplasty; however for younger patients (<50 years), open reduction and internal fixation is considered the gold standard approach. Despite there being no consensus on the specific procedure, everyday clinical practice in a level I trauma center has shown that postoperative maltorsion after internal fixation of femoral neck fractures can have a significantly worse impact on mobilization and outcome. Different methods for measurement of malrotations are reported in literature. However, any reported method for the assessment of a shaft malrotation in the femur does not work here. In femoral neck fractures, the pointer function of the femoral neck, which is absolutely essential for these techniques, is lost and cannot be set in relation to the condylar plane. These circumstances are not addressed in literature thus far. Therefore, we propose here a novel method to fill this diagnostic gap. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Three investigators (1 orthopaedic surgeons and 2 radiologists) measured the torsion of 20 legs on 10 patients using the Jarret method and a new geometric technique. To determine the intraobserver reliability the torsional angles were calculated again after 3 months. We applied a new geometric technique, without the need to include the femoral condyles in the measurement, to directly measure the angulation. For torsional difference, the interrater reliability -ICC (interclass correlation) between all investigators was 0.887 (good) (significance level: 95%CI, 0.668-0.969; p<0.001), by using the method of Jarret et al. and 0.933 (good) for the novel technique (significance level: 95%CI, 0.802-0.982; p<0.001). If the examinations are classified according to the patient side, our data show that for established methods, an ICC between the examiners on the right lower extremity is 0.978 (good) (95%CI, 0.936-0.994; p<0.001) and that on the left extremity is 0.955 (good) (95%CI, 0.867-0.988; p<0.001). Comparing with the new method, the right side assumes an ICC of 0.971 (good) (95%CI, 0.914-0.992; p<0.001), while the left side assumes an ICC of 0.910 (good) (95%CI, 0,736-0.976; p<0.001). When it comes to the intraobserver reliability, the measured cohort shows a significant better ICC for the novel method compared to Jarrett et al, with 0.907 respectively 0.786 for comparison in torsional differences. CONCLUSION: The established methods may fail in assessing this special aspect of malrotation after femoral neck fractures. Here, the method presented results in a significant difference between the injured and uninjured side and shows significant differences in results compared to conventional measurement methods. The inter- and intraobserver reliability determined in this study is excellent and even higher in the assessment of torsional differences than the established method. We believe that the measurement method presented in this study is a useful tool to objectify the postoperative deformities in this area and making therapy recommendations in the future.

Impact of active dose management on radiation exposure and image quality in computed tomography: An observational study in 1315 patients.

PURPOSE: To determine the clinical impact of CT dose management team on radiation exposure and image quality. METHODS: 2026 clinical routine CT examinations of 1315 patients were evaluated retrospectively. A CT dose management team was established as an integral part of the radiological department. It identified 5 CT protocols (A-E), where national reference values were exceeded the most. Those reference values included specifically the mean volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol) and the mean dose-length product (DLP). Baseline data (period 1) and follow up data (period 2) were obtained after reduction of tube voltage and increase of pitch or noise index. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were calculated to compare image quality. Two-sided t-tests were performed. RESULTS: Mean CTDIvol and mean DLP of the chest protocol (A) decreased after reduction of tube voltage (P < 0.01). In the chest/abdomen/pelvis protocol (B), the increase of noise index resulted in a significant mean CTDIvol decrease (P < 0.02) without statistical significance of mean DLP (P < 0.12). In the abdomen/pelvis protocol (C), mean CTDIvol (P = 0.01) and mean DLP (P < 0.01) were significantly lower after noise index increase. In the staging of hepatocellular carcinoma (D), mean CTDIvol and mean DLP were significantly lower after increase of pitch and noise index (P < 0.01). The lung protocol (E) yielded no significant changes after modulation (P > 0.05). SNR (protocol A) was significantly higher in period 2 (P < 0.04). Protocol D showed significantly lower selected SNR and CNR (P < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Establishing an operating dose management team as a standard for good clinical practice helps to considerably reduce CT radiation dose while preserving image quality.