Inhaled levodopa in Parkinson's disease patients with OFF periods: A randomized 12-month pulmonary safety study.

INTRODUCTION: CVT-301 is an orally inhaled levodopa therapy approved for the intermittent treatment of OFF episodes in Parkinson's disease patients who are taking a standard oral levodopa regimen. This open-label, randomized, controlled study over 12 months characterizes the safety, including pulmonary safety, of CVT-301 84 mg (nominal respirable levodopa fine-particle dose, 50 mg). METHODS: Patients experiencing motor fluctuations were randomized 2:1 to CVT-301 or an observational cohort (OC) receiving oral standard of care. Pulmonary safety was assessed using spirometry and carbon monoxide diffusion capacity (DLCO). Exploratory efficacy endpoints, assessed only for CVT-301, included change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III (UPDRS-III), patients achieving ON within 60 min and remaining ON at 60 min, Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale, and total daily OFF time. RESULTS: Of 408 patients randomized, 310 completed the study (204 in CVT-301 and 106 in OC). Mean 12-month changes from baseline for CVT-301 were -0.105 L (FEV1) and -0.378 mL/min/mm Hg (DLCO), and for OC were -0.117 L and -0.722 mL/min/mm Hg, respectively. Between-group comparisons were not statistically significant. For FEV1/FVC the 12-month change was -0.3 and -1.6, respectively, which was a significant between-group difference. However, between-group differences were not significant at 3 and 9 months and all changes from baseline were small (<2.0%). UPDRS-III scores improved from predose to 60 min postdose at all assessments; 80%-85% of patients switched ON within 60 min and remained ON; and >75% reported improvement in PGIC. OFF time decreased by 1.32-1.42 h/day. CONCLUSION: CVT-301 84 mg induced no clinically significant differences in pulmonary function compared with the OC. Improvements in motor scores, OFF time, and patient-reported outcomes support clinical efficacy for up to 12 months.

A reassessment of risks and benefits of dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease.

Neurologists have several choices of drugs that have been shown to be effective for the treatment of the symptoms of Parkinson's disease. Among the first options are the dopamine agonists, which are commonly used both as an early monotherapy and as an adjunct therapy to levodopa. However, before starting any treatment, the overall benefit-to-risk ratio to individual patients must be considered. For the dopamine agonists, the available evidence on their symptomatic efficacy, effect on long-term levodopa-related motor complications, putative effect on progression of disease, and adverse event profile must be taken into account. Recently, the occurrence of adverse events such as leg oedema, daytime somnolence, impulse control disorders, and fibrosis have increasingly been recognised. The risks of these potentially serious adverse events must therefore be taken into account and treatment decisions should be based on considerations of risks versus benefits for individual patients.

Validation of the freezing of gait questionnaire in patients with Parkinson's disease.

To revalidate the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FOG-Q), patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) were randomly assigned to receive rasagiline (1 mg/day) (n = 150), entacapone (200 mg with each dose of levodopa) (n = 150), or placebo (n = 154). Patients were assessed at baseline and after 10 weeks using the FOG-Q, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39). FOG-Q dimensionality, test-retest reliability, and internal reliability were examined. Convergent and divergent validities were assessed by correlating FOG-Q with UPDRS, BDI, and PDQ-39. Comparisons between FOG-Q item 3 and UPDRS item 14 were also made. Principal component analysis indicated that FOG-Q measures a single dimension. Test-retest reliability and internal reliability of FOG-Q score was high. FOG-Q was best correlated to items of the UPDRS relating to walking, general motor issues, and mobility. Correlations between baseline and endpoint suggested that FOG-Q item 3 is at least as reliable as UPDRS item 14. At baseline, 85.9% of patients were identified as "Freezers" using FOG-Q item 3 (> or =1) and 44.1% using UPDRS item 14 (> or =1) (P < 0.001). FOG-Q was a reliable tool for the assessment of treatment intervention. FOG-Q item 3 was effective as a screening question for the presence of FOG.

Efficacy of pramipexole and transdermal rotigotine in advanced Parkinson's disease: a double-blind, double-dummy, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Continuous dopaminergic drug delivery is an unmet medical need in advanced Parkinson's disease. The aim of this trial-Clinical Efficacy of Pramipexole And Transdermal Rotigotine in Advanced PD (CLEOPATRA-PD)-was to assess the efficacy of adjunct treatment with rotigotine in comparison with placebo and with pramipexole in levodopa-treated patients with advanced Parkinson's disease and wearing-off type motor fluctuations. METHODS: In this randomised controlled trial, eligible participants were randomly assigned to receive either rotigotine (up to 16 mg/24 h as a transdermal patch), pramipexole (up to 4.5 mg/day orally), or placebo for 6 months. Primary efficacy variables were absolute change in total hours "off" (assessed by home diaries) from baseline to end of study and responder rate (defined as the proportion of patients with >or=30% reduction in absolute off time per day). Analyses were done by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the US National Institutes of Health clinical trials database (ClinicalTrials.gov), number NCT00244387. FINDINGS: 204 patients were randomly assigned to receive rotigotine, 201 to receive pramipexole, and 101 to receive placebo; 427 (84%) completed the trial. The number of discontinuations in each group was similar; most were for adverse events. The mean dose of rotigotine was 12.95 mg/24 h (SD 3.54), the mean dose of pramipexole was 3.1 mg/day (1.24). Mean absolute change in off time from baseline was -2.5 h (SE 0.20) with rotigotine, -2.8 h (0.20) with pramipexole, and -0.9 h (0.29) with placebo. The absolute change in off time from baseline compared with placebo was -1.58 h (95% CI -2.27 to -0.90; p<0.0001) for rotigotine and -1.94 h (-2.63 to -1.25; p<0.0001) for pramipexole. Responder rates were 67% (134 of 200 patients) for pramipexole, 59.7% (120 of 201 patients) for rotigotine, and 35% (35 of 100 patients) for placebo. INTERPRETATION: In terms of change in absolute off time, rotigotine was non-inferior to pramipexole. Continuous delivery of rotigotine as transdermal patches could offer similar efficacy to oral pramipexole in patients with fluctuating Parkinson's disease over 6 months of treatment.

Slower progression of Parkinson's disease with ropinirole versus levodopa: The REAL-PET study.

Preclinical studies suggest ropinirole (a D2/D3 dopamine agonist) may be neuroprotective in Parkinson's disease (PD), and a pilot clinical study using (18)F-dopa positron emission tomography (PET) suggested a slower loss of striatal dopamine storage with ropinirole compared with levodopa. This prospective, 2-year, randomized, double-blind, multinational study compared the rates of loss of dopamine-terminal function in de novo patients with clinical and (18)F-dopa PET evidence of early PD, randomized 1 to 1 to receive either ropinirole or levodopa. The primary outcome measure was reduction in putamen (18)F-dopa uptake (Ki) between baseline and 2-year PET. Of 186, 162 randomized patients were eligible for analysis. A blinded, central, region-of-interest analysis showed a significantly lower reduction (p = 0.022) in putamen Ki over 2 years with ropinirole (-13.4%; n = 68) compared with levodopa (-20.3%; n = 59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-13.06). Statistical parametric mapping localized lesser reductions in (18)F-dopa uptake in the putamen and substantia nigra with ropinirole. The greatest Ki decrease in each group was in the putamen (ropinirole, -14.1%; levodopa, -22.9%; 95% CI, 4.24-13.3), but the decrease was significantly lower with ropinirole compared with levodopa (p < 0.001). Ropinirole is associated with slower progression of PD than levodopa as assessed by (18)F-dopa PET.