Erratum to: Resorbable osteosynthetic devices in pediatric traumatology: a prospective series of 24 cases.

Erratum to: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol DOI 10.1007/s00590-015-1656-8. The author would like to correct the errors in the publication of the original article. The corrected details are given below for your reading. Second and third authors' given names have been published incorrectly. The correct author names should be D. Popkov and H. Huber. The affiliations of the authors J. M. Poircuitte, D. Popkov, H. Huber, E. Polirsztok and P. Journeau are incorrect. The correct affiliations should be: J. M. Poircuitte, H. Huber, E. Polirsztok and P. Journeau: Service de chirurgie orthopedique pediatrique, Hopital d'enfant, Centre hospitalo-universitaire de Nancy, 5 allee du Morvan, 54500 Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France. D. Popkov: Russian Ilizarov Scientific Center for Restorative Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Kurgan, Russia. Corresponding author e-mail address should be p.journeau@ chu-nancy.fr.

Resorbable osteosynthetic devices in pediatric traumatology: a prospective series of 24 cases.

UNLABELLED: Bioresorbable devices are commonly used in traumatology. The biomechanical stability of these materials has improved in the past decade, and they have proven to be biologically non-hazardous, while their main advantage is that their use avoids reintervention for removal of the device. A prospective monocentric study was conducted: 24 patients presenting with a fracture that was amenable to osteosynthesis by small-diameter screws were included. These comprised ten tibial spine fractures, four osteochondritis dissecans of the distal femur, eight fractures of the medial epicondyle of the distal humerus, and two distal tibial apophyseal fractures. One or more screws were used that were made of a copolymer of poly-L-lactide-poly-D-lactide acid and trimethylene carbonate with a diameter of 2.8 mm. All patients were immobilized with a cast. Clinical and radiographic monitoring was conducted every month. The entire follow-up protocol had a duration of 24 months. One patient with osteochondritis dissecans presented with joint effusion. Joint stiffness at the time of cast removal resolved completely after 4 months, except for with three children (one epicondyle fracture, two tibial spine fractures). No subjective or objective instability could be detected by clinical examination. Radiographic follow-up revealed no secondary displacement, and all of the fractures had healed. No osteolysis was seen around the screws. No growth disturbances were noticed. Bioresorbable materials thus appear to be a suitable alternative approach for certain pediatric fractures. Their use resulted in outcomes similar to traditional techniques in terms of functional properties and bone healing. Although initial costs are presumably slightly higher, by avoiding a removal operation the total financial burden is most likely reduced. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Early complications with flexible intramedullary nailing in childhood fracture: 100 cases managed with precurved tip and shaft nails.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diaphyseal and metaphyseal fractures in children are frequently treated with the flexible intramedullary nailing (FIN) method. The aim of this study was to record postoperative complications and outcome in consecutive fracture patients treated with the new precurved tip and shaft nails and dedicated ergonomic instrumentation. METHODS: We report the analysis of 100 consecutive fractures followed up for a minimum of 6 months. Ninety-seven children were included, comprising 77 shaft and 23 metaphyseal fractures. Demographic data, duration of surgery, nail and medullary canal diameter, date of nail removal, clinical assessment, follow-up radiographs and all complications were recorded. RESULTS: Mean age was 9.7 years, and mean body weight 35.1 kg. Twenty-one fractures had associated lesions. Mean duration of surgery was 42.4 minutes. Nail removal was at a mean 6.1 months. Twelve percent of patients had complications, with six insufficient reductions, one delayed union, one non-union, one iterative fracture, and three skin impingements. Unexpected surgical revision was required in seven cases. At follow-up, only one patient showed functional impairment, with 20° pronation loss, and three showed more than 10° axial deviation on X-ray. CONCLUSION: The low rate of skin impingement compared with the literature may be due to the new dedicated instruments. We believe that other complications can be avoided if one follows the FIN principles, avoiding weak assembly due to an insufficient nail/medullary canal diameter ratio, which is a limiting factor for indications in adolescents. The surgeons reported that precurved shaft nails facilitated the FIN procedure, although this subjective judgment may be due simply to the novelty of the nails. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV. Retrospective study.