Qualitative assessment of the suitability of the Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire to monitor dysphagia in children aged 7-10 years with eosinophilic esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: The Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ) is a patient-reported outcome measure that assesses the frequency and severity of dysphagia in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE); however, it has only been validated for use in patients with EoE aged 11-40 years. This study examined the content validity of the DSQ and its usability on an electronic handheld device in children aged 7-10 years with EoE. METHODS: In this qualitative, observational cohort study, participants were recruited to partake in two rounds of interviews. During visit 1, a cognitive interview examined EoE-associated concepts and the appropriateness of the DSQ for assessing dysphagia. Participants completed the DSQ daily for 2 weeks, and DSQ scores were calculated. After 2 weeks, a second interview assessed the usability of the DSQ on the electronic device and the burden associated with completing it daily. RESULTS: Overall, 16 participants were included (aged 7-8 years: n = 8; aged 9-10 years: n = 8); most were male (75%) and white (81%), and the mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 8.4 (1.3) years. The most commonly reported EoE-associated concept was 'trouble with swallowing' (63% [10/16]). Most participants reported that the questions were 'easy to complete' and 'relevant to someone with EoE and dysphagia'. Overall, participants reported understanding the questions and associated responses; however, further probing demonstrated inconsistent comprehension. Key challenging concepts included 'solid food', 'trouble swallowing', 'vomit', and 'relief'; some participants also reported difficulty differentiating between pain levels (31% [4/13]). Most caregivers reported that their child had experienced dysphagia (94% [15/16]); however, mean (SD) DSQ scores over the study period were low (7.3 [7.4]), suggesting infrequent and mild dysphagia, or a lack of comprehension of the questions. Most participants reported that completing the DSQ on the electronic device was easy (93% [14/15]) and they would be willing to complete it for longer than 2 weeks (73% [11/15]). CONCLUSIONS: Difficulties with comprehension and comprehensiveness suggest that the DSQ may not be sufficiently comprehensive for use in all patients in this population, and wording/phrasing changes are required before use in a clinical trial setting.

Responsiveness and thresholds for clinically meaningful changes in worst pain numerical rating scale for dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pelvic pain in women with moderate to severe endometriosis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility, responsiveness, and thresholds for clinically meaningful change of a numerical rating scale for worst pain associated with dysmenorrhea (NRS-DYS) and nonmenstrual pelvic pain (NRS-NMPP) in women with moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain. DESIGN: Analysis of data from two phase III randomized clinical trials (EM-I [NCT01620528] and EM-II [NCT01931670]). SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Premenopausal women ages 18-49 years with moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain. INTERVENTION(S): Participants in both trials were randomized 3:2:2 to receive placebo, elagolix 150 mg once daily, or elagolix 200 mg twice daily for 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): NRS-DYS and NRS-NMPP. RESULT(S): EM-I enrolled 871 women and EM-II enrolled 815 women. For patients with a global impression of improvement at month 3, the least-squares mean change between baseline and month 3 was -3.6 (EM-I and EM-II) for NRS-DYS and -1.9 (EM-I) and -2.0 (EM-II) for NRS-NMPP. Standard errors of measurement were 2.99 (EM-I) and 2.86 (EM-II) for NRS-DYS and 1.74 (EM-I) and 1.71 (EM-II) for NRS-NMPP. Baseline half standard deviations were 0.78 (EM-I) and 0.85 (EM-II) for NRS-DYS and 0.92 (EM-I) and 0.96 (EM-II) for NRS-NMPP. Based on these results, clinically meaningful changes were defined as a reduction of 4 points for NRS-DYS and 2 points for NRS-NMPP. CONCLUSION(S): This study demonstrated the utility and responsiveness of separate numerical rating scales to assess worst pain for dysmenorrhea and NMPP in women with moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain and identified initial thresholds for clinically meaningful change.

Documenting the Journey of Patients with Eosinophilic Esophagitis and the Impact of the Disease on Patients and their Caregivers: A Cross-sectional, Qualitative Research Study.

INTRODUCTION: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune-mediated esophageal disease for which there is currently no approved treatment in the USA and only one approved therapy in Europe. EoE can significantly affect the lives of patients and caregivers; however, little has been published about patients' experiences from symptom onset to diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, qualitative research study. During one-on-one semi-structured interviews, patients with EoE in the USA and their caregivers provided information about their experiences of EoE before and during diagnosis, and their current experiences. Qualitative data were analyzed using a content analysis approach. RESULTS: The study included children aged 6-11 years with EoE (n = 4) and their caregivers (n = 4); adolescents aged 12-17 years with EoE (n = 7) and their caregivers (n = 7); and adults aged ≥ 18 years with EoE (n = 20). The diagnosis of EoE was often arduous and took many years. Patients and caregivers were frequently frustrated with the complexities of diagnosing EoE, which often involved multiple healthcare providers and procedures. Patients reported physical and psychosocial burdens associated with EoE before diagnosis, including interference with social activities, school, and work. Patients also reported feeling frustrated or anxious. These burdens frequently remained after diagnosis. Caregivers also reported anxiety and, in some cases, interference with their ability to work. CONCLUSION: This study of EoE describes the difficult journey faced by patients and their caregivers from symptom onset to diagnosis and beyond.

Clinically Meaningful Reduction in Dyspareunia Is Associated With Significant Improvements in Health-Related Quality of Life Among Women With Moderate to Severe Pain Associated With Endometriosis: A Pooled Analysis of Two Phase III Trials of Elagolix.

BACKGROUND: Dyspareunia experienced by women diagnosed with endometriosis is associated with a decreased health-related quality of life (HRQoL). AIM: We evaluated the relationship of clinically meaningful improvements in dyspareunia with HRQoL changes among women with endometriosis. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of pooled data from the phase III ELARIS-I and ELARIS-II clinical trials. Women aged 18-49 years with moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain were randomized to placebo, elagolix 150 mg once daily, or elagolix 200 mg twice daily. HRQoL was measured using the validated Endometriosis Health Profile-30 questionnaire (EHP-30), consisting of 5 core domains and a sexual intercourse modular domain. Dyspareunia was ranked 0-3 (none, mild, moderate, or severe) or not applicable using a daily eDiary and averaged monthly. A woman with a clinically meaningful dyspareunia response (dyspareunia responder) was defined as a woman with a reduction from the baseline in dyspareunia score greater than or equal to a predetermined cutoff while maintaining stable/decreased analgesic use. OUTCOMES: Dyspareunia response impact on EHP-30 scores was determined at 3 and 6 months using multivariate linear regression controlling for age, baseline EHP-30 scores, and dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain symptom severity. RESULTS: Analysis included 1,368 women with a mean age of 32.2 years. Dyspareunia responders had significant improvements vs non-responders in all adjusted mean EHP-30 domain scores at months 3 and 6 (control and powerlessness: -17.8 and -18.5; emotional well-being: -10.0 and -10.4; pain: -15.3 and -15.7; self-image: -11.4 and -12.8; social support: -14.3 and -14.0; and sexual intercourse: -18.1 and -19.7; all P < .0001). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Dyspareunia improvements are associated with both personal and psychological benefits. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: This study involved a large sample of women from a well-defined patient population to provide statistical power in evaluating the results. As such, the findings may not be generalizable in a real-world setting. Although the perception of dyspareunia and its severity and the associated effect on HRQoL was subjective, the use of a large patient sample was used to minimize potential issues with this limitation. CONCLUSION: Clinically meaningful responses in dyspareunia are associated with improvements across multiple HRQoL domains among women with endometriosis. Agarwal SK, Soliman AM, Pokrzywinski RM, et al. Clinically Meaningful Reduction in Dyspareunia Is Associated with Significant Improvements in Health-Related Quality of Life Among Women with Moderate to Severe Pain Associated with Endometriosis: A Pooled Analysis of Two Phase III Trials of Elagolix. J Sex Med 2020;17:2427-2433.

Health-Related Quality of Life Improvements in Patients With Endometriosis Treated With Elagolix.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of elagolix on clinically meaningful improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measured by the EHP-30 (Endometriosis Health Profile-30). METHODS: Data from two phase III trials of elagolix for moderate to severe pain associated with endometriosis were pooled and analyzed as three groups: placebo, elagolix 150 mg once daily, or elagolix 200 mg twice daily. Patients were administered the EHP-30 questionnaire at baseline, and at months 1, 3, and 6 of treatment. Previously established responder definitions were applied to determine percentages of patients with clinically meaningful EHP-30 improvements. The probability of meeting EHP-30 responder definitions with elagolix compared with placebo at months 3 and 6 was determined by Poisson regression analysis, controlling for baseline scores. RESULTS: At month 6, the probabilities of meeting EHP-30 subscale responder definitions for pain, control and powerlessness, self-image, social support, emotional well-being, and sexual intercourse were 169% (adjusted relative risk [aRR]: 2.69, 95% CI 2.26-3.21), 129% (aRR 2.29, 95% CI 1.96-2.67), 80% (aRR 1.80, 95% CI 1.54-2.11), 70% (aRR 1.70, 95% CI 1.47-1.97), 67% (aRR 1.67, 95% CI 1.45-1.92), and 62% (aRR 1.62, 95% CI 1.36-1.92) greater, respectively (all P<.001), in the 200-mg group than in the placebo group. Although lower in magnitude than the 200-mg group, the 150-mg group also had greater probabilities of meeting responder definitions than the placebo group for all subscales except sexual intercourse. The probabilities of meeting responder definitions for pain, control and powerlessness, self-image, social support, and emotional well-being were 75% (aRR 1.75, 95% CI 1.44-2.14), 50% (aRR 1.50, 95% CI 1.25-1.80), 22% (aRR 1.22, 95% CI 1.01-1.47), 30% (aRR 1.30, 95% CI 1.09-1.53), and 35% (aRR 1.35, 95% CI 1.16-1.57) greater, respectively (all P<.05), in the 150-mg group than in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: Patients with moderate to severe pain associated with endometriosis and were treated with elagolix experienced clinically meaningful HRQOL improvements. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01620528 and NCT01931670. FUNDING SOURCE: AbbVie Inc.

Psychometric assessment of the health-related productivity questionnaire (HRPQ) among women with endometriosis.

Objective: Endometriosis impacts health-related quality of life. The objective was to assess the validity and responsiveness of the Health-Related Productivity Questionnaire, version 2 (HRPQ). Methods: Outcome measures (Endometriosis Health Profile-30; pain scales; and global assessment) from Elaris Endometriosis I and II clinical trials (EM-I, EM-II) were used. Validity testing using Cohen's conventions was assessed. Known-groups validity was evaluated using generalized linear models comparing clinical responders, assessment of change, and the endometriosis impact. The effect size (ES) and standard error of means were calculated to evaluate responsiveness. Results: 871 and 815 women participated in the EM-I and EM-II trials. The total hours of lost work among employed women were 16.5 (±11.4) hours per week for EM-I and 15.2 (±11.3) for EM-II. The total hours of lost work among the household group were 8.3 (±8.7) hours for EM-I and 8.4 (±9.0) hours for EM-II. HRPQ discriminated between all known group assessments tested. Correlations for the HRPQ compared to other measures were small to moderate. Moderate to large ES was observed and the ability of the HRPQ to detect change was strong using patient-reported impressions. Conclusion: The HRPQ is a valid and responsive tool for evaluating patient-reported productivity at work and at home among women with endometriosis.

Achieving clinically meaningful response in endometriosis pain symptoms is associated with improvements in health-related quality of life and work productivity: analysis of 2 phase III clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis-related pain symptoms have a negative impact on health-related quality of life and productivity. In fact, as endometriosis-related symptom severity and the number of symptoms experienced increases, health-related quality of life decreases. Dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pelvic pain are prominent symptoms experienced by women with endometriosis and were shown to have improved with the oral, nonpeptide gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, elagolix. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this post hoc analysis was to address the question of if patients show a clinical response (in dysmenorrhea or nonmenstrual pelvic pain), do they also have improvements in health-related quality of life and in productivity? STUDY DESIGN: This post hoc analysis used data from the Elaris Endometriosis-I and Elaris Endometriosis-II phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled studies. A surgical diagnosis of endometriosis (in the past 10 years), premenopausal, aged 18-49 years, and moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain were among the inclusion criteria for both trials. Women self-reported pain daily using a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 3 (severe pain); daily pain was assigned to either dysmenorrhea or nonmenstrual pelvic pain based on self-reported bleeding on that particular day. In addition, their self-reported endometriosis-associated pain must have been an average of moderate or severe during the month leading to baseline for inclusion in the trial program. Patients were characterized as achieving a clinical response for dysmenorrhea or nonmenstrual pelvic pain (ie, responder or nonresponder), which was defined as women who did not have an increase in analgesic use and who met the pain reduction score threshold at month 3. Pain reduction score thresholds were defined separately for dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pelvic pain in the trial using receiver-operating characteristics analysis. Health-related quality of life was assessed using the Endometriosis Health Profile-30; work productivity was assessed using the Health-Related Productivity Questionnaire. RESULTS: Women enrolled in Elaris Endometriosis-I (n = 871) and Elaris Endometriosis-II (n = 815) were included in this analysis. Patients with a clinical response during treatment to dysmenorrhea or nonmenstrual pelvic pain also experienced a meaningful improvement in all domains of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 at month 3. Patients who did not show a dysmenorrhea or nonmenstrual pelvic pain clinical response at month 3 did not exhibit mean improvements in Endometriosis Health Profile-30 domain scores that indicate an Endometriosis Health Profile-30 responder. Productivity improved among dysmenorrhea clinical responders. In the Elaris Endometriosis-I study, clinical responders lost a total of 5.9 hours compared with a total of 13.0 hours for nonresponders of employment-related work at month 3 (P < .0001). Among women in the Elaris Endometriosis-II study, a total of 4.1 hours and 10.4 employment-related hours were lost at month 3 for dysmenorrhea responders vs nonresponders (P < .001). Similar results were obtained when analyzed by non-enstrual pelvic pain responder status. CONCLUSION: Women with moderate to severe endometriosis-related pain, who are clinical responders based on dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pelvic pain, also experience significant and clinically meaningful improvement in health-related quality of life and productivity as measured by the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 and Health-Related Productivity Questionnaire, respectively.

Impact of elagolix on work loss due to endometriosis-associated pain: estimates based on the results of two phase III clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the impact of elagolix on work loss due to endometriosis-associated pain. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of data from the Elaris I and II clinical trials. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Employed women ages 18-49 years with moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain. INTERVENTION(S): In the two trials, participants were randomized to 6 months of treatment with placebo, elagolix 150 mg once a day, or elagolix 200 mg twice a day. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Data on planned work hours, presenteeism, absenteeism, and total work loss (absenteeism + presenteeism) at baseline and month 3 were collected using the Health-Related Productivity Questionnaire. RESULT(S): This analysis included employed participants from EM-I (n = 672) and EM-II (n = 626). Between baseline and month 3, compared with participants treated with placebo, participants treated with elagolix 150 mg once a day gained > 2 hours total work/week (EM-I, 2.20 ± 1.03; EM-II, 2.65 ± 1.14). Participants treated with 200 mg twice a day gained > 4 hours total work/week (EM-I, 4.91 ± 1.04; EM-II, 4.64 ± 1.14). Both absenteeism and presenteeism were reduced, although most of the gain was due to reduced presenteeism. Estimated cost savings after 6 months of treatment with elagolix were > $1,500 U.S. at 150 mg once a day and > $3,300 U.S. at 200 mg twice a day. CONCLUSION(S): Compared with placebo, treating moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain with elagolix reduced absenteeism and improved productivity in employed women, which should result in cost savings. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER(S): NCT01620528 (EM-I) and NCT01931670 (EM-II).

Impact of Respiratory Syncytial Virus-Confirmed Hospitalizations on Caregivers of US Preterm Infants.

This study assessed the impact of respiratory syncytial virus-confirmed hospitalizations (RSVH) on caregivers of high-risk preterm infants. Caregivers for infants born at 29 to 35 weeks' gestational age and hospitalized for confirmed RSV disease responded to measures of self-rated and perceived infant stress (1-7; 7 = very stressful), perceived infant health (0-100; 100 = best imaginable health), and productivity impairment. Data were collected at hospital discharge through 1 month post-discharge. Caregiver responses indicated high stress levels, poor health, and productivity loss were reported at discharge; however, steady improvements were seen through 1 month post-discharge: caregiver-rated stress (from 6 to 2), infant stress (5 to 1), caregiver-perceived infant health (64 to 84), and productivity loss (mothers: 91% to 31%; fathers: 81% to 18%). Qualitative results indicated emotional impact, family routine disruption, financial concerns, and medical concerns persisted at 1 month post-discharge. This study found the caregiver burden of RSVH persists at least 1 month beyond discharge.