Changes in pain, daily occupations, lifestyle, and health following an occupational therapy lifestyle intervention: a secondary analysis from a feasibility study in patients with chronic high-impact pain.

OBJECTIVES: This study explored changes in pain-related parameters, occupational function, occupational balance, lifestyle factors, and self-perceived health status in adults with chronic high-impact pain participating in an occupational therapy lifestyle intervention. METHODS: This one-group longitudinal feasibility study was performed in three continuous feasibility rounds. The occupational therapists-led intervention targeted meaningful occupations, regular physical activity, and a healthy diet. The intervention contained individual and group sessions and was added to the standard multidisciplinary chronic pain treatment. Outpatients (n=40, 85 % females, 46.6 ± 10.9 years old) participated in the study between April 2019 and December 2021. The analysis includes data for 31 participants. Analysis of pre-post changes assessed after each feasibility round were performed for the outcomes: pain intensity, pain sensitivity and pain modulation (pressure pain threshold and tolerance, temporal summation of pain and conditioned pain modulation), pain self-efficacy, pain catastrophizing, motor and process skills, occupational balance, daily wake-time movement, daily walking steps, body mass index, waist circumference, blood pressure, and self-perceived health status. RESULTS: Improvements in motor skills (assessment of motor and process skills score=0.20 (1.37; 1.57), 95 % CI 0.01; 0.38) and temporal summation of pain (-1.19 (2.86; -1.67), 95 % CI -2.16; -0.22), but a decrease in pain tolerance (-7.110 (54.42; 47.32), 95 % CI -13.99; -0.22) were observed. Correlation analysis suggested moderate-to-very strong statistically significant relationships in several outcomes related to pain, health, pain coping, occupational balance, occupational functioning, body anthropometrics, and pain sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that the lifestyle intervention would benefit motor skills while effects on other outcomes were unclear in adults with chronic pain. To confirm the findings, a randomized trial evaluating effectiveness is needed. Ethical committee number: SJ-307 Reg. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03903900.

Occupational therapy lifestyle intervention added to multidisciplinary treatment for adults living with chronic pain: a feasibility study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of an occupational therapy lifestyle intervention for adults living with chronic pain. DESIGN: This one-group pre-post interventional study investigated the feasibility and outcomes of the Redesign Your Everyday Activities and Lifestyle with Occupational Therapy (REVEAL(OT)) intervention targeting meaningful activities and lifestyle. SETTINGS: The occupational therapist-led intervention was added to standard multidisciplinary chronic pain treatment at a Danish pain centre. PARTICIPANTS: Of the 40 adult participants aged 18-64 (mean 46.6±10.9 years old, 85% females, chronic pain duration ≥3 months), there were 31 completers. INTERVENTION: Three feasibility rounds were carried out in 2019-2021. The intervention focused on meaningful activities, healthy eating habits and daily physical activity. Methods of didactical presentations, group discussions, personal reflection and experiential learning were used in the intervention composed both of individual and group sessions. OUTCOMES: Primary outcomes were predefined research progression criteria evaluated by the red-amber-green method. Secondary outcomes measured pre-post changes in health-related quality of life and occupational performance and satisfaction. RESULTS: The study demonstrated satisfactory programme adherence (77.5%), patients' self-perceived relevance (97%), timing and mode of delivery (97%) and assessment procedure acceptance (95%). No adverse events causing discontinuation occurred. Recruitment rate (n=5.7 monthly), retention (77.5%) and the fidelity of delivery (83.3%) needed improvement. We observed no improvement in health-related quality of life (mean=0.04, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.12) but positive change in occupational performance (mean=1.80, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.35) and satisfaction (mean=1.95, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.84). The participants reached the minimal clinically important difference for occupational performance (≥3.0 points in 13.8%) and satisfaction (≥3.2 points in 24.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The REVEAL(OT) intervention was feasible to deliver and beneficial for the participants' occupational performance and satisfaction. The interventions' recruitment, retention and delivery strategies need optimisation in a future definitive trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03903900.

Does mutual compensation of the cognitive effects induced by pain and opioids exist? An experimental study.

RATIONALE: Studies have demonstrated that both pain and opioids have actions on the central nervous system that may interfere with cognitive function, but their effects have mainly been analysed separately and not as an integrated process. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to test two hypotheses: (1) the analgesic effect of opioids improves cognitive function by decreasing pain, and (2) pain antagonizes cognitive effects of opioids. METHODS: Randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Three experiments were conducted with 22 healthy males. Sustained attention, memory and motor function/attention/mental flexibility were evaluated by continuous reaction time (CRT), verbal fluency test (VFT) and trail making test-B (TMT-B), respectively. In the 1st experiment, the cognitive effects of experimental tonic pain of mild and moderate intensities produced by a computer-controlled pneumatic tourniquet cuff were assessed; in the 2nd, the effects of saline solution and remifentanil were assessed in the absence of pain; and in the 3rd experiment, the cognitive effects of moderate pain intensity relieved by remifentanil infusion were assessed followed by increasing pain to moderate intensity during a constant remifentanil infusion. RESULTS: The first two experiments demonstrated that pain and remifentanil impaired CRT. In the 3rd experiment, remifentanil infusion relieving pain significantly impaired CRT and further deterioration was noted following increasing pain intensity. CONCLUSION: Pain and remifentanil seemed to have additive deleterious cognitive effects. This study represents an initial step to enhance our basic understanding of some of the cognitive effects following a painful stimulus and an opioid infusion separately and combined in a sequence comparable to clinical settings.

Spatial and temporal aspects of deep tissue pain assessed by cuff algometry.

This study assessed spatial and temporal aspects of pressure pain during increasing and constant compressions using a cuff algometer and during adaptive compressions using a closed-loop feedback system for maintaining stable pain. Experimental setup consisted of a pneumatic tourniquet cuff, a computer-controlled air compressor, and a 10-cm electronic visual analogue scale (VAS). The first experiment assessed spatial summation for cuff pain by recording the pressure-pain stimulus-response (SR) function during increasing compressions with single and double cuffs. The second experiment assessed temporal profile of cuff pain during constant compression for 10 min beginning at pain intensities of 2, 4, and 6 cm on the VAS. The third experiment assessed temporal pressure profile when pain was maintained for 10 min by a close-loop system within target zones of +/-0.5 cm VAS at pain intensities of 2, 4, and 6 cm on the VAS.Doubling the tissue volume under the cuff shifted the SR function to the left, demonstrating spatial summation. The constant cuff pressure evoked typical biphasic response consisting of an overshoot in pain intensity, followed by decreasing pain, or adaptation. The pain intensity was significantly correlated to the time of constant stimulation, showing time-dependency of pain encoding. Both overshoot magnitude and adaptation rate were dependent on the starting pain intensity. The pain decrease rate was lowest for a pain intensity of 2 cm on the VAS. The overshoot magnitude was lowest for a pain intensity of 6 cm on the VAS. Both the overshoot and the adaptation were maximal for a pain intensity of 4 cm on the VAS. The oscillating pressure generated by closed-loop system led to constant rather than adapting pain at intensities of 2, 4, and 6 cm on the VAS. The cuff algometer is highly configurable tool for assessment of pain sensitivity by pressure-pain and time-pain functions. The presented models are useful additions to a researcher's armamentarium for further pharmacological and clinical studies on deep tissue pain and related mechanisms.

Modality-specific facilitation and adaptation to painful tonic stimulation in humans.

The study assessed the influence of stimulus modality on adaptation or facilitation of pain during tonic cold and tourniquet pressure stimulation. Experimental set-up for the cold stimulation consisted of a thermo-tank with water, cooled to 3 degrees C, circulation pump, electronic thermometer and an electronic 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS). Experimental set-up for the tonic pressure stimulation consisted of a pneumatic tourniquet cuff, a computer-controlled air compressor, and an electronic VAS. The first experiment assessed temporal profiles of pain intensity and skin temperature during immersion of the non-dominant hand and lower arm into cold water for 3 min or until the pain tolerance limit was reached. The second experiment assessed temporal profile of cuff pain intensity during constant compressions for 10 min beginning at pain intensities of 2, 4, and 6 cm on the VAS ("VAS 2", "VAS 4" and "VAS 6" sessions). Subjects enduring cold stimulation for less than 3 min were defined as non-adapting to cold and vice versa. The intensity of cold pain in non-adapting subjects increased significantly faster than in adapting subjects and reached significantly higher magnitude. The course of pain intensity during constant compression, estimated by a linear regression line, was increasing or decreasing, representing facilitation or adaptation of pain, respectively. The typical profile of adaptation consisted of an "overshoot" in pain intensity, followed by a decrease in pain intensity. There was significant correlation in VAS slopes between sessions separated by 2-5 days, suggesting consistent pattern in pain responses to tonic pressure stimulation. Adaptation or facilitation rates and the overshoot magnitude were dependent on the initial pain intensity (2, 4, or 6 cm on the VAS). The facilitation rate was highest and the adaptation rate was lowest during the "VAS 2" session, while the facilitation rate was lowest and the adaptation rate was highest during the "VAS 6" session. The overshoot magnitude was lowest during "VAS 6" session. Adapting and non-adapting/facilitating responses to cold and to pressure during "VAS 6" session were not correlated, suggesting that pain course and therefore stimulus tolerance during tonic stimulation are modality-specific. The results of the study suggest that tolerance of tonic painful pressure and cold stimulations is specific to stimulus modality and may represent separate nociceptive mechanisms.

Pressure-pain function in desensitized and hypersensitized muscle and skin assessed by cuff algometry.

This study assessed a newly developed cuff pressure algometry during discrete leg skin/muscle sensitization and anesthesia. Experimental setup consisted of a pneumatic tourniquet cuff, a computer-controlled air compressor, and an electronic visual analog scale (VAS). The first experiment assessed cuff algometry before and after selective anesthesia of the skin and the muscle under the cuff. The second experiment assessed cuff algometry before and during skin and muscle sensitization with capsaicin cream and injection of capsaicin. Pressure-pain detection threshold, pressure equivalent to the pain intensity of 2 on the VAS (PVAS2), pressure-pain tolerance threshold, and pressure-pain stimulus-response (SR) function were evaluated. Local anesthesia of the muscle increased the pain thresholds significantly and shifted the average SR function to the right indicating desensitization, whereas cutaneous anesthesia did not affect the pressure thresholds and increased the slope of the SR function. Capsaicin cream did not affect pressure-pain tolerance threshold, whereas PVAS2 and the slope of the SR function were significantly decreased. Intramuscular capsaicin injection decreased the pain thresholds and did not affect the slope of the SR function. Both interventions shifted the SR function to the left. The cuff algometry reliably assessed the pressure-pain SR function during muscle sensitization/desensitization and might supplement conventional pressure algometry for standardized pressure-pain function assessment.