CXCR4-CXCL12-CXCR7, TLR2-TLR4, and PD-1/PD-L1 in colorectal cancer liver metastases from neoadjuvant-treated patients.

A neoadjuvant clinical trial was previously conducted in patients with resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM). At a median follow up of 28 months, 20/33 patients were dead of disease, 8 were alive with disease and 5 were alive with no evidence of disease. To shed further insight into biological features accounting for different outcomes, the expression of CXCR4-CXCL12-CXCR7, TLR2-TLR4, and the programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-1 ligand (PD-L1) was evaluated in excised liver metastases. Expression profiles were assessed through qPCR in metastatic and unaffected liver tissue of 33 CRLM neoadjuvant-treated patients. CXCR4 and CXCR7, TLR2/TLR4, and PD-1/PD-L1 mRNA were significantly overexpressed in metastatic compared to unaffected liver tissues. CXCR4 protein was negative/low in 10/31, and high in 21/31, CXCR7 was negative/low in 16/31 and high in 15/31, CXCL12 was negative/low in 14/31 and high in 17/31 CRLM. PD-1 was negative in 19/30 and positive in 11/30, PD-L1 was negative/low in 24/30 and high in 6/30 CRLM. Stromal PD-L1 expression, affected the progression-free survival (PFS) in the CRLM population. Patients overexpressing CXCR4 experienced a worse PFS and cancer specific survival (CSS) (p = 0.001 and p = 0.0008); in these patients, KRAS mutation identified a subgroup with a significantly worse CSS (p < 0.01). Thus, CXCR4 and PD-L1 expression discriminate patients with the worse PFS within the CRLM evaluated patients. Within the CXCR4 high expressing patients carrying Mut-KRAS in CRLM identifies the worst prognostic group. Thus, CXCR4 targeting plus anti-PD-1 therapy should be explored to improve the prognosis of Mut-KRAS-high CXCR4-CRLMs.

Regulatory T cells, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), CXCL10, CXCL11, epidermal growth factor (EGF) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) as surrogate markers of host immunity in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To identify a phenotype that could be informative and prognostic in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) peripheral blood was evaluated for TH1, TH2, regulatory T cells (Tregs), natural killer (NK) and NKT cells and for cytokines/chemokines. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Peripheral blood from 77 patients with RCC and 40 healthy controls was evaluated by flow cytometry using monoclonal antibodies against CD4, CD25, FoxP3, CD45RA, CD45RO, CD152, CD184, CD279, CD3, CD16, CD56, CD161, CD158a, CD4, CD26, CD30, CD183 and CD184. A concomitant evaluation of 38 molecules was conducted in patients' serum using a multiplex biometric ELISA-based immunoassay. RESULTS: The number of NK cells CD3⁻/CD16⁺, CD3⁻/CD16⁺/CD161⁺ (NK) and CD3⁻/CD16⁺/CD161⁺/CD158a⁺ (NK- Kir 2+) was greater in the patients with RCC (P < 0.05); and the number of Treg cells CD4⁺/CD25(high+)/FOXP3⁺ and the subset CD4⁺/CD25(high+)/FOXP3⁺/CD45RA⁺ (naïve) and CD45R0⁺(memory) cells, were greater in the patients with RCC (P < 0.001). An increase in the following was observed in the serum of patients with RCC compared with healthy controls: interleukin (IL)-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, G-CSF, CXCL10, CXCL11, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). According to Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA), CXCL10, IL-6, IL-8, epidermal growth factor (EGF), HGF and VEGF were associated with a network that controls cellular movement, tissue development and cellular growth. Kaplan-Meier analysis for disease-free survival showed that high numbers of CD4⁺/CD25(high+)/FOXP3⁺/CD45RA⁺ (Treg naïve) and low numbers of CD3⁻/CD16⁺/CD161⁺/CD158a⁺ (NK-Kir+) cells predict short disease-free survival in patients with RCC. CONCLUSION: Concomitant evaluation of Treg (CD4⁺/CD25(high+)/FOXP3⁺ and CD4⁺/CD25(high+)/FOXP3⁺/CD45RA⁺) and of six soluble factors (IL-6, IL-8 ,VEGF, CXCL10, CXCL11, EGF, HGF) might be a surrogate marker of host immunity in patients with RCC.

Inhibition of stromal CXCR4 impairs development of lung metastases.

Compelling evidence has emerged in recent years indicating that stromal cells play a critical role in disease progression. CXCR4 is a G-protein-coupled receptor with a major role in lymphocyte homing. Its ligand, CXCL12, is a highly efficient chemotactic factor for T cells, monocytes, pre-B cells, dendritic cells and myeloid bone marrow-derived cells (BMDCs). In addition, the CXCR4-CXCL12 axis plays a central role in tumor growth and metastasis. To evaluate the effect of genetic CXCR4 reduction on metastasis development, murine melanoma B16 cells were injected into the tail vein of C57BL/6 CXCR4(+/+) and CXCR4(+/-) mice in the presence of the CXCR4 inhibitor, Plerixafor (previously named AMD3100). Although lung metastases developed in wild-type CXCR4(+/+) and heterozygote CXCR4(+/-) mice, nodules were significantly smaller in the latter. CXCR4 pharmacological inhibition by Plerixafor further reduced lung metastases in CXCR4(+/-) mice, preserving the pulmonary architecture (4.18 ± 1.38 mm(2) vs. 1.11 ± 0.60 mm(2), p = 0.038). A reduction in LY6G-positive myeloid/granulocytic cells and in p38 MAPK activation was detected in lungs from CXCR4(+/-) mice compared to CXCR4(+/+) mice [LY6G-positive myeloid CXCR4(+/-) vs. CXCR4(+/+) (p = 0.0004); CXCR4(+/+) vs. CXCR4(+/+) Plerixafor-treated (p = 0.0031)] suggesting that CXCR4 reduction on myeloid-derived cells reduced their recruitment to the lung, consequently impairing lung metastases. Our findings argue in favor of a specific role of CXCR4 expressed in stromal cells that condition the pro-tumor microenvironment. In this scenario, CXCR4 antagonists will target neoplastic cells as well as the pro-tumor stromal microenvironment.

Differential role of CD133 and CXCR4 in renal cell carcinoma.

The chemokine receptor CXCR4 and CD133, putative stem cell markers, were previously described in renal cancer (RCC). To evaluate the biological and prognostic role of CD133 and CXCR4 in RCC the expression was evaluated through qPCR and immunoblotting in human renal cancer cell lines (786-O, A498, ACHN, CAKI-1, SN12C, TK10, UO31) and patients biopsies. Renal cancer cells and surgical biopsies expressed functional CXCR4 while CD133 was not detectable. CXCR4 and CD133 expression was then evaluated in 240 renal cancer patients through immunohistochemistry. CXCR4 and CD133 were low in 19.1% and 59.6%; intermediate in 20% and 17.9%; high in 60.8% and 22.5% of the cases, respectively. CXCR4 was overexpressed in tumours (p= 0.02), while CD133 was over expressed in healthy tissues (p= 0.04). Disease free survival Kaplan Meier plots suggest that prognosis is unfavourable for patients whose primary tumours express CXCR4 (p= 0.0199) but nor CD133 (p= 0.151) neither the concomitant CXCR4-CD133 (p=0.848) high expression affected prognosis. Analysis of prognostic factors suggests that age, clinical presentation, AJCC stage and CXCR4 had a significant prognostic value at the univariate analysis. The CXCR4 predictive ability was confirmed at the multivariate analysis while no prognostic role was identified for CD133.Thus concomitant CD133 and CXCR4 evaluation is not worth in RCC patient while the CXCR4 prognostic role encourage CXCR4 antagonists as promising therapeutic option.