RESUMO
Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) can be caused by a variety of factors and its severity can range from a mild concussion to a complete severing of the spinal cord. Τreatment depends on the type and severity of injury, the patient's age and overall health. Reduction of dislocated or fractured vertebrae via closed manipulation or surgical procedures, fixation and removal of bony fragments and debris that compromise the spinal canal are indicated for decompression of the spinal cord and stabilization of the spine. However, when there is no obvious traumatic obstruction of spinal canal, the question arises as to whether laminectomy is needed to be performed to improve neurological outcome. Methods: A literature review covering all indexed studies published between 2013 and 2023 was performed using keywords to identify the patient group of interest (spinal cord injury, SCI, spinal cord trauma, cervical, thoracic, lumbar, thoracolumbar),central cord syndrome (CCS) and the interventions (laminectomy, laminoplasty, decompression, duroplasty). Results: This review includes6 observational studies investigating the outcome of posterior spinal decompression in patients suffering from spinal cord injury without traumatic spinal cord stenosis. Most patients already had degenerative stenosis. From a total of 202, 151 patients (74.7%) improved neurologically by at least one grade at ASIA scale, after being treated with either laminectomy, laminoplasty, duroplasty or a combination of these techniques. Conclusion: Early decompression in SCI patients remains a reasonable practice option and can be performed safely, but no specific evidence supports the use of laminectomy alone. There is emerging evidence that intended durotomy followed by extended meningoplasty may improve the neurological outcome in patients suffering from SCI when meta-traumatic edema is apparent. However, the lack of high-quality evidence and results support the need for further research.
RESUMO
Introduction: Radiotherapy of central nervous system (CNS) is treatment against many paediatric cancers, even if it is a well-recognized risk factor for meningioma formation. An increased risk of developing secondary brain tumors like radiation-induced meningiomas (RIM) is related to irradiated patients. Research question: This retrospective study aims to present RIM cases treated in a single tertiary-hospital in Greece and compare the results with international literature and cases of sporadic meningiomas. Materials and methods: A single-centre retrospective study of all patients diagnosed between January 2012 and September 2022 with RIM after having been irradiated in CNS for paediatric cancer was undertaken through hospital's electronic record and clinical notes, identifying baseline demographics and latency period. Results: Thirteen patients were identified with RIM diagnosis after receiving irradiation for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (69.2%), Premature Neuro-Ectodermal Tumour (23.1%), and Astrocytoma (7.7%). Median age at irradiation was 5 years old and 32 years old at RIM's presentation. The latent period from irradiation to meningioma diagnosis was 26.23 â± â5.96 years. After surgical excision, histopathologic results showed grade I meningiomas in 12 out of thirteen cases, while only one atypical meningioma was diagnosed. Conclusion: Patients who underwent CNS-radiotherapy in childhood for any condition have an increased risk of developing secondary brain tumors such as radiation-induced meningiomas. RIMs resemble sporadic meningiomas in symptomatology, location, treatment, and histologic grade. However, long-term follow-up and regular check-ups are recommended in irradiated patients due to short latency period from irradiation to RIM development, which means younger age patients than those with sporadic meningiomas cases.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Apathy is one of the most frequent neuropsychiatric symptoms encountered in dementia. Early diagnosis and timely treatment of apathy in dementia are crucial because apathy has been associated with poor disease outcome, reduced daily functioning, and caregiver distress. DESIGN: Extensive electronic search from the databases included in the National Library of Medicine as well as PsychInfo and Google Scholar for studies which have investigated the effect of non-pharmacological treatments of apathy in dementia. Quality of the studies was appraised. RESULTS: A total of 1303 records were identified and 120 full-texts assessed. Forty-three unique studies were reviewed. A variety of interventions were found to be effective in reducing apathy in demented patients, particularly when provided in a multidisciplinary manner. However, quantification of the effect was limited by the marked methodological heterogeneity of the studies and the small number of studies where apathy was the primary outcome measure. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of apathy in dementia is a complex and underexplored field. Certain studies suggest promise for a variety of non-pharmacological interventions. Standardized and systematic efforts primarily focusing on apathy may establish a benefit from individualized treatments for specific disease groups.
