Examining Parental Acceptance of Confidential Contraception Initiation in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: The pediatric emergency department (PED) is a valuable site for contraceptive services among adolescents at risk for pregnancy. Studies have shown that adolescents are interested in such services; however, little is known about parental opinions on contraceptive care in the PED. We aimed to (1) assess parental acceptance of confidential provisions of contraception in the PED and (2) identify facilitators/barriers to parental acceptance of contraception in this setting. METHODS: This study included parents/guardians of females aged 14 to 19 years who presented to the PED with any chief complaint. Participants completed a self-administered 25-question survey based on previously validated questions to assess their acceptance of contraception provisions, both confidentially and with parental involvement, for their adolescent in the PED. χ 2 or Fisher exact tests were used to examine variables associated with parental acceptance of confidential contraception. RESULTS: Of the 102 parents/guardians surveyed, most parents (58/102, 57%) were accepting of confidential contraception for their adolescent. However, more parents (82/101, 81%) were accepting of contraception in the ED with their involvement, as opposed to confidentially without their involvement. Those accepting had an increased perceived risk of their adolescent having sex or becoming pregnant (mean [SD], 13 [20]; P = 0.02; odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.09), were aware of their adolescent's rights to confidential contraception (62%; P = 0.006; odds ratio, 3.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-7.28), and had slightly older teens (16 vs 15.5 years, P = 0.01). More parents accepted OCPs over IUDs in the PED (53/58, 91% vs 26/57, 46%). CONCLUSIONS: Although most parents were accepting of the PED provider offering confidential contraception to their adolescent, more parents preferred to be involved with decisions regarding contraception, in a collaborative approach. Further research is necessary to better elucidate parental/adolescent preferences.

Postpartum psychological distress after emergency team response during childbirth.

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a protocol determining the relationship between emergency team response (ETR) during childbirth and acute stress disorder (ASD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. Methods: In a prospective, observational, cohort design, women experiencing ETR during childbirth were approached and recruited on postpartum day-1 and followed for six weeks. Demographics, obstetric and birth characteristics, ASD scores and PTSD scores (by Impact of Events Scale, IES and PCL-civilian) were recorded. Recruitment and retention rates were recorded, and scores were compared to women who did not experience ETR. Results: Three hundred sixty-nine were approached and 249 were enrolled (67.5% recruitment rate). One hundred twenty-five completed all procedures (50.2% retention). Twenty experienced ETR (3.5% event rate), 12 enrolled (60.0% recruitment rate) and 8 completed the study (66.7% retention). The ETR group had higher PCL and IES scores (PCL: ETR median 12, non-ETR median 2, p = .08; IES: ETR median 22.5, non-ETR median 20, p = .08). ASD scores were similar between groups. Conclusions: Methodology investigating the link between ETR and postpartum psychological distress is feasible and acceptable. A relationship between ETR and PTSD symptoms appears to exist, with ETR being associated with higher PTSD scores compared to non-ETR childbirths. Methods that incorporate awareness of the unique concerns of vulnerable populations are needed.