Improved tumour detection by gastrin receptor scintigraphy in patients with metastasised medullary thyroid carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Radiopeptide imaging is a valuable imaging method in the management of patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NET). To determine the clinical performance of gastrin receptor scintigraphy (GRS), it was compared with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS), computed tomography (CT) and (18)F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with metastasised/recurrent medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). METHODS: Twenty-seven consecutive patients underwent imaging with GRS, SRS (19 patients), CT and PET (26 patients). GRS and SRS were compared with respect to tumour detection and uptake. CT, PET, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound (US) and follow-up were used for verification of findings. In addition, GRS, CT and PET were directly compared with each other to determine which method performs best. RESULTS: Nineteen patients underwent both GRS and SRS. Among these, GRS showed a tumour detection rate of 94.2% as compared to 40.7% for SRS [mean number of tumour sites (+/-SD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI): GRS 4.3+/-3.1/2.8-5.7, SRS 1.8+/-1.6/1.1-2.6]. In 26 patients, GRS, CT and PET were compared. Here, GRS showed a tumour detection rate of 87.3% (CT 76.1%, PET 67.2%; mean number of tumour sites and 95% CI: GRS 4.5+/-4.0/2.9-6.1, CT 3.9+/-3.5/2.5-5.3, PET 3.5+/-3.3/2.1-4.8). If GRS and CT were combined, they were able to detect 96.7% of areas of tumour involvement. CONCLUSION: GRS had a higher tumour detection rate than SRS and PET in our study. GRS in combination with CT was most effective in the detection of metastatic MTC.

18F-FDG PET, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, and CT in metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma: a clinical study and an analysis of the literature.

AIM: To determine the clinical potential of 2-[F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (F-FDG PET) in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), we compared it to computed tomography (CT), and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Blinded evaluation of PET, CT and SRS images obtained from 26 patients with histologically proven metastatic MTC was done by nuclear medicine and radiology specialists. Sites of tumour involvement were classified as "sure" or "suspicious". The data were analysed in comparison to two different standards. Either those sites classified as "sure" by at least one of the methods were defined as the standard or those sites of involvement which were classified as "sure" by at least two methods. RESULTS: Dependent on the type of data analysis performed, PET was able to demonstrate 56.8%/80.6% of the tumour sites, CT showed 64.5%/79.6%, and SRS showed 47.5%/69.9% of the tumour sites. CONCLUSION: Overall, CT is similar or better than PET in our patients (dependent on the standard) while SRS is inferior to both other techniques. Our data are in agreement with publications that consider CT superior to PET in the diagnosis of metastatic MTC while other studies show superiority of PET. However, a combination of CT and PET seems to be the most appropriate non-invasive diagnostic approach in patients with MTC.