Fatal Exacerbations of Systemic Capillary Leak Syndrome Complicating Coronavirus Disease.

We report 2 fatal exacerbations of systemic capillary leak syndrome (SCLS), also known as Clarkson disease, associated with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in the United States. One patient carried an established diagnosis of SCLS and the other sought treatment for new-onset hypotensive shock, hemoconcentration, and anasarca, classic symptoms indicative of an SCLS flare. Both patients had only mild-to-moderate symptoms of COVID-19. This clinical picture suggests that these patients succumbed to complications of SCLS induced by infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Persons with known or suspected SCLS may be at increased risk for developing a disease flare in the setting of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 infection.

Therapeutic plasma exchange for COVID-19-associated hyperviscosity.

BACKGROUND: Recent data suggests an association between blood hyperviscosity and both propensity for thrombosis and disease severity in patients with COVID-19. This raises the possibility that increased viscosity may contribute to endothelial damage and multiorgan failure in COVID-19, and that therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) to decrease viscosity may improve patient outcomes. Here we sought to share our experience using TPE in the first 6 patients treated for COVID-19-associated hyperviscosity. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Six critically ill COVID-19 patients with plasma viscosity levels ranging from 2.6 to 4.2 centipoise (cP; normal range, 1.4-1.8 cP) underwent daily TPE for 2-3 treatments. RESULTS: TPE decreased plasma viscosity in all six patients (Pre-TPE median 3.75 cP, range 2.6-4.2 cP; Post-TPE median 1.6 cP, range 1.5-1.9 cP). TPE also decreased fibrinogen levels in all five patients for whom results were available (Pre-TPE median 739 mg/dL, range 601-1188 mg/dL; Post-TPE median 359 mg/dL, range 235-461 mg/dL); D-dimer levels in all six patients (Pre-TPE median 5921 ng/mL, range 1134-60 000 ng/mL; Post-TPE median 4893 ng/mL, range 620-7518 ng/mL); and CRP levels in five of six patients (Pre-TPE median 292 mg/L, range 136-329 mg/L; Post-TPE median 84 mg/L, range 31-211 mg/L). While the two sickest patients died, significant improvement in clinical status was observed in four of six patients shortly after TPE. CONCLUSIONS: This series demonstrates the utility of TPE to rapidly correct increased blood viscosity in patients with COVID-19-associated hyperviscosity. Large randomized trials are needed to determine whether TPE may improve clinical outcomes for patients with COVID-19.

Multidrug-Resistant Organism Infections in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Left ventricular assist devices improve survival prospects in patients with end-stage heart failure; however, infection complicates up to 59% of implantation cases. How many of these infections are caused by multidrug-resistant organisms is unknown. We sought to identify the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of multidrug-resistant organism infection in patients who have left ventricular assist devices. We retrospectively evaluated the incidence of multidrug-resistant organisms and the independent risk factors associated with them in 57 patients who had permanent left ventricular assist devices implanted at our institution from May 2007 through October 2011. Outcomes included death, transplantation, device explantation, number of subsequent hospital admissions, and number of subsequent admissions related to infection. Infections were categorized in accordance with criteria from the Infectious Diseases Council of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Multidrug-resistant organism infections developed in 18 of 57 patients (31.6%)-a high incidence. We found 3 independent risk factors: therapeutic goal (destination therapy vs bridging), P=0.01; body mass index, P=0.04; and exposed velour at driveline exit sites, P=0.004. We found no significant differences in mortality, transplantation, or device explantation rates; however, there was a statistically significant increase in postimplantation hospital admissions in patients with multidrug-resistant organism infection. To our knowledge, this is the first report in the medical literature concerning multidrug-resistant organism infection in patients who have permanent left ventricular assist devices.

Antiinfective therapy for pregnant or lactating patients in the emergency department.

PURPOSE: Special considerations in pharmacotherapy for infectious diseases in pregnant and lactating women in the emergency department (ED) setting are reviewed. SUMMARY: With many women turning to the ED as a source of primary care, it is essential for pharmacists involved in providing ED services to guide the selection of appropriate antiinfective agents during pregnancy and lactation; this area of practice is complicated by the very limited body of published data on the safety and efficacy of maternal antimicrobial use and potential fetal or neonatal adverse effects. Infectious diseases commonly encountered in the ED include sexually transmitted diseases, bacterial vaginosis and other vaginal infections, respiratory and urinary tract infections, and pneumonia. Recommended first-line therapies for pregnant or lactating women may differ from those recommended for other patient populations. Although some widely used antiinfective classes and agents are generally considered safe for use in pregnant women, others (e.g., clarithromycin, fluoroquinolones) have been linked to birth defects and neonatal adverse effects. In addition to guiding ED practitioners in the appropriate use of antiinfective agents in pregnant women and nursing mothers, pharmacists can reinforce the importance of appropriate follow-up care (including specialist referral or culture testing in some cases) and ongoing preventive health measures such as vaccine administration. CONCLUSION: The use of antiinfective agents in pregnant or lactating women requires consideration not only of the drugs' effectiveness but also their possible effects on the fetus or newborn and the nature of follow-up care. References are available to help clinicians make treatment decisions.

Management of hypertensive emergency and urgency.

Severe hypertension is a frequent condition among patients presenting to emergency departments. Historically, this has been referred to as a hypertensive crisis. In addition, these hypertensive crises have been further divided into either hypertensive emergencies or urgencies depending on the presence or absence of target organ damage, respectively. The management differs between these crises in both the rapidity of blood pressure correction and the medications used. Hypertensive emergencies must be treated immediately with intravenous antihypertensive medications. However, hypertensive urgencies may be treated with oral antihypertensive agents to reduce the blood pressure to baseline or normal over a period of 24-48 hr. Appropriate identification, evaluation, and treatment of these conditions are of great importance in the emergency department to prevent progression of organ damage and death. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the hypertensive crises and their management.