Safe Use of Erythromycin For Refractory Gastroparesis After Small Bowel Transplantation.

Current therapeutic options with prokinetic agents for posttransplant gastroparesis are limited. Erythromycin is associated with adverse reactions, including corrected QT interval prolongation and cytochrome P450 3A4 isoenzyme inhibition. The use of erythromycin has been avoided in patients undergoing treatment with cyclosporine or tacrolimus because of significant fluctuations in therapeutic immunosuppression levels. We report herein the successful use of erythromycin after visceral transplant to treat delayed gastric emptying. Two patients were managed with oral erythromycin (initial dose of 750 mg/d divided into 3 doses) for gastroparesis after visceral transplant. Patient 1 was a woman aged 42 years with a history of chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction syndrome who underwent isolated small bowel transplant with dual (gastric and duodenal) proximal allograft anastomosis. Posttransplant gastroparesis was initially managed with oral metoclopramide. The patient also required high doses of tacrolimus (36 mg/d) to maintain adequate immunosuppression levels. The decision was made to change metoclopramide to erythromycin, which significantly decreased the daily tacrolimus dose requirement (from 36 to 9 mg/d), with resolution of nausea and intermittent bloating symptoms. Patient 2 was a woman aged 35 years with ultra-short gut syndrome after extensive enterectomy due to intestinal volvulus who underwent uneventful combined intestinal and colon transplant. Conventional pharmacologic therapy for gastroparesis was initiated after surgery without success. Erythromycin was started 15 days posttransplant, with significant improvement in her symptoms, and discontinued 47 days post-transplant. To maintain therapeutic levels (8-10 mg/dL), daily tacrolimus dose was decreased 75.8% and 36.5% for patients 1 and 2, respectively. No significant side effects associated with erythromycin use were observed in either patient. Our findings here suggest that erythromycin may be safely used for gastroparesis after small bowel transplant. Close monitoring of immunosuppressive drug levels and dose adjustments of other medications affected by inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A4 are advised.

Surgical and medical approach to patients requiring total small bowel resection: Managing the "no gut syndrome".

BACKGROUND: Total resection of the jejunum and ileum, a rarely performed procedure, is indicated after mesenteric vascular events, trauma, or resection of abdominal neoplasms. We describe our recent experience with the operative and medical management of patients with "no gut syndrome." METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 341 adult patients who were referred to our center between January 2013 and December 2016. RESULTS: Thirteen patients with a mean age of 42.5 years (range 17 to 66 years) underwent near total enterectomy. Indications for small bowel resection were vascular event (n = 5), intraabdominal fibroid/desmoid (n = 4), and trauma (n = 4). Foregut secretions were managed with duodenocolostomy (n = 5), tube decompression (n = 5), and end duodenostomy (n = 2). Duodenal stump was stapled off in 4 cases. One patient underwent a spleen-preserving duodenopancreatectomy combined with total enterectomy. Biliary secretions were managed with choledochocolostomy. All patients were discharged on full total parenteral nutrition infused over a 10- to 16-hour period. Average total parenteral nutrition volume and caloric requirement were 2,800 mL/day (range 2,000 to 4,000) and 1,774 Kcal/day (range 1,443 to 2,290), respectively. Patients who underwent duodenocolonic anastomosis received smaller TPN volume (33.8 vs 49.8 mL/kg). Ten patients (77%) required supplemental intravenous fluid. There were no intraoperative or perioperative deaths. One patient was lost to follow-up 2 months after operation. After a 20-month median follow-up (range 4 to 48 months), 9 patients are still alive (75%). All patients with duodenocolostomy remain alive (median follow-up 36.4 months). Three patients underwent uneventful isolated small bowel transplantation, and another 4 are being evaluated or are already listed for visceral transplantation. CONCLUSION: In summary, resection of the entire small bowel is feasible and can be a lifesaving procedure for a select group of patients. Long-term survival can be achieved in specialized centers. In addition, reestablishment of gastrointestinal tract continuity after total enterectomy appears to be the best option for postoperative fluid and electrolyte management.