TRANSLATION AND VALIDATION OF THE BRAZILIAN VERSION OF THE "QUALITY OF LIFE ASSESSMENT IN SPINA BIFIDA" QUESTIONNAIRE FOR CHILDREN AND TEENAGERS.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability and validity of the Quality of Life Assessment in Spina Bifida (QUALAS), children and teenager's versions (QUALAS C and T, respectively). This is the first self-applicable quality of life assessment tool for patients under 13 years of age, which also addresses the issue of urinary and fecal incontinence. METHODS: Two urologists performed the translation of both QUALAS versions. A commission produced a consensus version (Version 2), which was applied as a pilot study to define Version 3. It was then backtranslated into English and compared with the original version for equivalence of concepts. Internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reproducibility was analyzed after two assessments with an interval from two to four weeks. Convergent and divergent validities between the QUALAS and a generic health-related quality of life questionnaire, the KIDSCREEN-27, were studied through Pearson's correlation. RESULTS: The reliability analysis showed good internal consistency for QUALAS-C (α=0.73) and QUALAS-T (α=0.79) and good reproducibility in both questionnaires (QUALAS-C - ICC=0.86; QUALAS-T - ICC=0.92). For QUALAS-C convergent validity, there was a low correlation between its items (r=0.35). In addition, a low correlation was also found in the divergent validity analysis, when compared to the KIDSCREEN-27 (r≤0.33). Convergent and divergent validities of the QUALAS-T questionnaire had similar results: r=0.46 and r≤0.49, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: After the adaptation and validation process, QUALAS-C and QUALAS-T questionnaires showed to be reliable and valid instruments for measuring the health-related quality of life of children and teenagers with spina bifida aged 8 years or older.

Translation and validation of the brazilian version of the quality of life assessment in spina bifida questionnaire for children and teenagers / Tradução e validação da versão brasileira do questionário quality of life assessment in spina bifida para crianças e adolescentes

ABSTRACT Objective: To assess the reliability and validity of the Quality of Life Assessment in Spina Bifida (QUALAS), children and teenager's versions (QUALAS C and T, respectively). This is the first self-applicable quality of life assessment tool for patients under 13 years of age, which also addresses the issue of urinary and fecal incontinence. Methods: Two urologists performed the translation of both QUALAS versions. A commission produced a consensus version (Version 2), which was applied as a pilot study to define Version 3. It was then backtranslated into English and compared with the original version for equivalence of concepts. Internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reproducibility was analyzed after two assessments with an interval from two to four weeks. Convergent and divergent validities between the QUALAS and a generic health-related quality of life questionnaire, the KIDSCREEN-27, were studied through Pearson's correlation. Results: The reliability analysis showed good internal consistency for QUALAS-C (α=0.73) and QUALAS-T (α=0.79) and good reproducibility in both questionnaires (QUALAS-C - ICC=0.86; QUALAS-T - ICC=0.92). For QUALAS-C convergent validity, there was a low correlation between its items (r=0.35). In addition, a low correlation was also found in the divergent validity analysis, when compared to the KIDSCREEN-27 (r≤0.33). Convergent and divergent validities of the QUALAS-T questionnaire had similar results: r=0.46 and r≤0.49, respectively. Conclusions: After the adaptation and validation process, QUALAS-C and QUALAS-T questionnaires showed to be reliable and valid instruments for measuring the health-related quality of life of children and teenagers with spina bifida aged 8 years or older.

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar a confiabilidade e a validade do questionário QUALAS (Quality of Life Assessment in Spina Bifida) nas versões para crianças e adolescentes (QUALAS-C e QUALAS-T, respectivamente). Este é o primeiro instrumento autoaplicável de avaliação da qualidade de vida para pacientes menores de 13 anos e que também aborda a questão das incontinências urinária e fecal. Métodos: Dois urologistas realizaram a tradução das duas versões do QUALAS. Uma comissão produziu uma versão de consenso (Versão 2), a qual foi aplicada no estudo piloto para definir a Versão 3. Esta foi retrotraduzida para o inglês e comparada à versão original para equivalência de conceitos. Para verificar a confiabilidade, analisou-se a consistência interna com o alfa de Cronbach e a reprodutibilidade com o coeficiente de correlação intraclasse (CCI) após duas aplicações do questionário em intervalo de duas a quatro semanas. As validades convergente e divergente foram estudadas por meio da correlação de Pearson entre o QUALAS e um questionário genérico de qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde, o KIDSCREEN-27. Resultados: A análise de confiabilidade revelou que ambos os questionários apresentaram boa consistência interna (QUALAS-C - α=0,73; QUALAS-T - α=0,79) e boa reprodutibilidade (QUALAS-C - CCI=0,86; QUALAS-T - CCI=0,92). Na análise da validade convergente do QUALAS-C, observou-se baixa correlação entre os itens (r=0,35). Além disso, a análise da validade divergente também demonstrou baixa correlação quando comparada ao KIDSCREEN-27 (r≤0,33). As validades convergente e divergente do questionário QUALAS-T tiveram resultados semelhantes: r=0,46 e r≤0,49, respectivamente. Conclusões: Após o processo de adaptação e validação, pode-se afirmar que os questionários QUALAS-C e QUALAS-T são instrumentos confiáveis e válidos para a mensuração da qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde de crianças e adolescentes com espinha bífida a partir dos 8 anos de idade.

Y-type urethral duplication with rectal implantation of the urethra: Which is the best approach?

INTRODUCTION: Y-type urethral duplication describes the condition in which a functional urethra is implanted in the rectum, and there is also a dysplastic topic urethra which produces mostly urinary dribbling. These patients are at risk of urinary tract complications and UTI. We aimed to present the surgical steps of a case treated by ASTRA approach in which we separated the urethra from the rectum and created a perineal urethrostomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We treated a 5-month-old boy with Y-type (IIA-2) urethral duplication, in whom the orthotopic urethra was patent just in the penile segment. The patient had urinary flow per anus and minimal dribbling through the orthotopic urethra. We performed a combined cystoscopy with retrograde urethrogram and managed to catheterize the dysplastic urethra with a guide-wire that showed ectopic implantation in the prostatic urethra, below the bladder neck. We performed an ASTRA procedure to separate the urethra from the rectum. The urethral stump was further mobilized to the perineum and anastomosed to a perineal skin flap to create a stoma and minimize the risk of stricture. RESULTS: The patient was followed at 2 month-intervals, and at 6 months follow-up had an excellent outcome. CONCLUSION: The ASTRA approach proved to be an excellent alternative for Y-type urethral duplication with functional urethra implanted in the rectum. We believe that further efforts to reconstruct the urethra should be avoided, with a better and simpler option being to create a definitive perineal urethrostomy.