A Simple Novel Technique to Estimate Tacrolimus Dosages During the Early Post Kidney Transplantation Period.

BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus pharmacokinetics prediction by CYP3A5 genotyping is not available in many Asian resource-limited settings. Therefore, an alternative technique is needed to estimate the dose of tacrolimus perioperatively. The 12-hour level after the first dose (C12-0) is an alternative technique for estimating the dose of tacrolimus. This simple and inexpensive calculation technique can be used by any transplantation center. METHODS: A prospective study on a cohort of 57 incident post-kidney transplant recipients was conducted. The whole-blood tacrolimus trough level (C12-0) was measured at 12 hours after the first dose (0.1 mg/kg) of orally administered tacrolimus during transplantation. Concomitant medications with CYP3A5 inhibitors/inducers were not allowed. Genotyping for CYP3A5 expression was carried out by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The dosages and trough levels of tacrolimus at postoperative day 7 and postoperative months 1 to 3 were measured and analyzed for the dose requirements for therapeutic levels (mg/kg/d). RESULTS: The doses of tacrolimus were widely diverse, ranging from 0.049 to 0.260 mg/kg/d and 0.031 to 0.298 mg/kg/d at day 7 and months 1 to 3, respectively. There were 9, 28, and 20 patients (15.8%, 49.1%, and 35.1%) with CYP3A5 *1/*1, *1/*3, and *3/*3, respectively. The CYP3A5 genotypes were significantly correlated with the target tacrolimus dose at day 7 (r(2) = 0.307) and the stable dose at months 1 to 3 (r(2) = 0.337). The C12-0 level also was significantly correlated with the dose of tacrolimus at day 7 (r(2) = 0.546) and the stable dose at months 1 to 3 (r(2) = 0.406). CONCLUSIONS: There were strong correlations between the C12-0 level and the tacrolimus doses during the perioperative period at day 7 and the stable period at 1 to 3 months. Countries with limited resources for genotype testing can use the C12-0 level as an alternative to estimate the tacrolimus dose.

The outcomes of kidney transplantation in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative recipients receiving graft from HBsAg-positive donors: a retrospective, propensity score-matched study.

The outcomes of kidney transplantation (KT) from hepatitis B surface antigen-positive [HBsAg(+)] donors to HBsAg(-) recipients remain inconclusive, possibly due to substantial differences in methodological and statistical models, number of patients, follow-up duration, hepatitis B virus (HBV) prophylactic regimens and hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) levels. The present retrospective, longitudinal study (clinicaltrial.gov NCT02044588) using propensity score matching technique was conducted to compare outcomes of KT between HBsAg(-) recipients with anti-HBs titer above 100 mIU/mL undergoing KT from HBsAg(+) donors (n = 43) and HBsAg(-) donors (n = 86). During the median follow-up duration of 58.2 months (range 16.7-158.3 months), there were no significant differences in graft and patient survivals. No HBV-infective markers, including HBsAg, hepatitis B core antibody, hepatitis B extracellular antigen and HBV DNA quantitative test were detected in HBsAg(+) donor group. Renal pathology outcomes revealed comparable incidences of kidney allograft rejection while there were no incidences of HBV-associated glomerulonephritis and viral antigen staining. Recipients undergoing KT from HBsAg(+) donors with no HBV prophylaxis (n = 20) provided comparable outcomes with those treated with lamivudine alone (n = 21) or lamivudine in combination with HBV immunoglobulin (n = 2). In conclusion, KT without HBV prophylaxis from HBsAg(+) donors without hepatitis B viremia to HBsAg(-) recipients with anti-HBs titer above 100 mIU/mL provides excellent graft and patient survivals without evidence of HBV transmission.

Potential impact of Thai Kidney Transplant program on immunosuppressive utilization: an analysis of the national transplant registry.

BACKGROUND: The Thai Kidney Transplant (TKT) program was launched in October 2008 to promote transplantation among previously disadvantaged populations, using fixed-rate provider payment. This study investigated if the introduction of this program could alter the natural practice trends of immunosuppressive drug use. METHODS: Data from the Thai Transplantation Registry were analyzed. The change in trend of immunosuppressive use was assessed using the multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) technique. RESULTS: During 1987-2012, 3975 kidney transplantations were done. The average age of patients was 42 years and 62% were male. Chronic glomerulonephritis accounted for one third of those with known causes of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Eighty-six percent were on hemodialysis before transplantation. Prednisolone was used in 95.87% of all transplant recipients, whereas calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), mycophenolates (MPAs), azathioprine (AZA), and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORis) were used in 95.67%, 64.22%, 12.25%, and 2.31%, respectively. Overall use after 2008 was decreased for AZA (18.16% to 3.40%) and mTORis (2.86% to 1.5%) but increased for MPAs (50.80% to 84.34%), CNIs (95.43% to 96.04%), and prednisolone (95.60% to 96.29%), as compared with before the program inception. The slopes of use trends of AZA, MPAs, and CNIs did not significantly marginally differ from their natural trends before the program inception (P = .496, .108, and .741, respectively). However, the natural increasing use trend of mTORis significantly changed to a decreasing pattern after the introduction of the TKT program (P = .018). CONCLUSION: Fixed-rate provider payment might interfere with the natural practice trends of immunosuppressive drug use.