Modelo de Credibilidad Emprendedora en los estudiantes de enfermería y fisioterapia / The Entrepreneurial Credibility Model on students from nursing and physiotherapy

Objetivo: El artículo analiza cuáles son los factores sociodemográficos, rasgos de personalidad y variables endógenas y exógenas de viabilidad que ejercen una mayor influencia en la conducta del estudiante emprendedor de los grados universitarios de enfermería y fisioterapia. Método: El esquema teórico se basa en el modelo del potencial emprendedor de Krueger y Brazeal, desarrollado a partir de los modelos del evento emprendedor de Shapero y Sokol, y de la teoría de la conducta planificada de Ajzen. El estudio identifica las variables clave en la percepción de deseabilidad y viabilidad que afectan directamente a la credibilidad emprendedora del estudiante. La muestra está formada por 302 estudiantes de grados de ciencias de la salud (122 de enfermería y 180 de fisioterapia). Resultados: La ecuación del modelo de credibilidad emprendedora determina la gran incidencia de las variables de percepción de viabilidad, especialmente de la autoeficacia y de la creatividad e innovación. El modelo incluye también las variables de esfuerzo y perseverancia, desempleo y financiación. Conclusiones: Los programas formativos orientados al desarrollo de la competencia del emprendimiento serán efectivas, si inciden en factores de personalidad como apertura, propensión al riesgo, responsabilidad y motivación del logro, pues todas ellas inciden directamente en la variable clave de creatividad e innovación. El estudio también destaca que los estudiantes de fisioterapia son más emprendedores que los estudiantes de enfermería (AU)

Objective: This paper analyses social and demographic factors, personality traits and the endogenous and exogenous variables of feasibility in order to find out the ones that generate the greatest influence on the entrepreneurial behaviour from physiotherapy and nursing students. Method: The study is based on the Krueger and Brazeal model of entrepreneurial potential, which is a mix of the Shapero’s model of the entrepreneurial event, and the Ajzen’s theory of planned behaviour. The research identifies the key variables of perceived desirability and feasibility on the entrepreneur student credibility. The data were collected from 302 students of health science degrees: nursing (122); physiotherapy (180). Results: The equation model of the credibility on entrepreneurship shows the importance of the feasibility perception, especially on innovation and creativity, and self- efficacy. The model also includes the variables of effort and perseverance, unemployment and funding. Conclusion: The educative programs on entrepreneurship are effective when they impact to personality traits as openness, propensity to risk, responsibility and need of achievement. This is because each one of them affects directly to the variable key of creativity and innovation. The study confirms that physiotherapy students are more likely to become entrepreneurs than nursing students are (AU)

Regulation of colorectal cancer cell apoptosis by the n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids Docosahexaenoic and Eicosapentaenoic.

Several studies have suggested that the n-3 fatty acids Docosahexaenoic (DHA) and Eicosapentaenoic (EPA) have an important protective effect on colorectal cancer, and this could be at least partly due to their proapoptotic activity. It is unclear, however, how this phenomenon is triggered and what mechanisms are implicated. Here, we show that both DHA and EPA have an important proapoptotic effect on colorectal cancer cells with different molecular phenotypes but not in noncancerous cells. Apoptosis is caspase dependent, and both intrinsic and extrinsic pathways are implicated. The dimerization of Bax and Bak, the depolarization of the mitochondrial membrane, and the subsequent release of cytochrome c and Smac/Diablo to the cytosol evidence the activation of the intrinsic pathway. The implication of the extrinsic pathway is shown by the activation of caspase-8, along with the down-regulation of FLIP. The timing of caspase-8 activation, and the oligomerization of Bid with Bax, suggest a cross-talk with the intrinsic pathway. None of the death receptors that commonly initiate the extrinsic pathway: FAS, TNF-R1, and TRAIL-R2 are found to be responsible for triggering the apoptosis cascade induced by DHA and EPA. Neither PPARgamma nor cyclooxygenase-2, two likely candidates to regulate this process, play a significant role. Our findings suggest that the down-regulation of two key regulatory elements of the extrinsic and intrinsic pathways, FLIP and XIAP, respectively, is determinant in the induction of apoptosis by DHA and EPA. These fatty acids could potentially be useful adjuvant anticancer agents in combination with other chemotherapeutic elements.

The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil in colorectal cancer depends on the mismatch repair status.

AIMS: The aim of this study is to evaluate if mismatch repair (MMR) defective colorectal cancer has a different response to adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy in a cohort of patients prospectively followed during 5 years. METHODS: The cohort included 754 surgically treated patients with colorectal cancer. MMR status was diagnosed by MLH1 and MSH2 immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability analysis. Median follow-up was 49.2 months (range 1-73). At inclusion, 505 patients were diagnosed as TNM II or III stage, analysis of the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy was made on this population. Adjuvant chemotherapy was applied to 248 patients (98.2% 5-FU based). RESULTS: MMR deficiency was found in 76 patients (10.1%). No differences were found in overall survival (log-rank p=0.3) or disease-free survival (log-rank p=0.3) regarding MMR status. Adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in patients in the II or III stage, but this improvement is only evident in patients with MMR-competent tumours (log-rank p=0.00001). Survival of patients with MMR-defective tumours does not improve with adjuvant chemotherapy (log-rank p=0.7). A multivariate analysis showed an independent effect of the interaction between MMR status and adjuvant chemotherapy (Hazard ratio 2.04; 95% confidence interval: 1.42-2.93). CONCLUSION: In a cohort of colorectal cancer patients, those with MMR-deficient tumours seem not to benefit from 5-FU-based chemotherapy.

A prospective, multicenter, population-based study of BRAF mutational analysis for Lynch syndrome screening.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Mismatch repair (MMR) deficiencies are the hallmark of tumors arising in Lynch syndrome, however, in approximately 15% of sporadic colorectal cancers (CRC) these deficiencies most often are associated with somatic methylation of the MMR gene MLH1. Recently, an oncogenic mutation in the BRAF gene has been involved in sporadic CRC showing MMR deficiencies as a result of MLH1 promoter methylation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the contribution of BRAF V600E mutation analysis in the identification of MSH2/MLH1 gene mutation carriers in newly diagnosed CRC patients. METHODS: BRAF V600E mutation was analyzed in CRC patients with MMR deficiencies (microsatellite instability and/or lack of MLH1/MSH2 protein expression) in the EPICOLON population-based study. The effectiveness and efficiency of different strategies were evaluated with respect to the presence of MSH2/MLH1 germline mutations. RESULTS: MMR deficiencies were detected in 119 of the 1222 CRC patients with tumors showing either microsatellite instability (n = 111) or loss of protein expression (n = 81). BRAF mutation was detected in 22 (18.5%) of the patients. None of the patients with unambiguous germline mutation had BRAF mutation. Regardless of the strategy used to identify MSH2/MLH1 gene carriers, the introduction of BRAF analysis in these patients slightly improves their effectiveness. The introduction of BRAF mutation analysis as a step before germline genetic testing in patients with MMR deficiencies achieved a significant reduction in costs per mutation detected. CONCLUSIONS: Detection of BRAF V600E mutation could simplify and improve the cost effectiveness of genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, especially in patients whose family history is incomplete or unknown.

Detection of metachronous neoplasms in colorectal cancer patients: identification of risk factors.

PURPOSE: Patients with colorectal cancer have a high risk of developing metachronous neoplasms. Identification of predictive factors associated with such conditions would allow individualized follow-up strategies in these patients. This study was designed to identify individual and familial factors associated with the development of metachronous colorectal neoplasms in patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS: In the context of a prospective, multicenter, general population-based study-the EPICOLON project-all patients with colorectal cancer attended in ten Spanish hospitals during a one-year period were included. Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis or inflammatory bowel disease were excluded. All patients were monitored by colonoscopy within two years of the diagnoses. Demographic, clinical, pathologic, molecular (microsatellite instability status and immunohistochemistry for MSH2 and MLH1), and familial characteristics (fulfillment of Amsterdam I or II criteria, and revised Bethesda guidelines) were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 353 patients were included in the study. At two years of follow-up, colonoscopy revealed the presence of adenomas in 89 (25 percent) patients and colorectal cancer in 14 (3.9 percent) patients, in 7 cases restricted to anastomosis. Univariate analysis demonstrated that development of metachronous neoplasm (adenoma or colorectal cancer) was associated with personal history of previous colorectal cancer (odds ratio, 5.58; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.01-31.01), and presence of previous or synchronous adenomas (odds ratio, 1.77; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.21-3.17). Although nonstatistical significance was achieved, metachronisms were associated with gender (P<0.09) and differentiation degree (P<0.08). Multivariate analysis identified previous or synchronous adenomas (odds ratio, 1.98; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.16-3.38) as independent predictive factor. Neither presence of tumor DNA microsatellite instability nor family history correlated with the presence of metachronous neoplasms. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with previous or synchronous colorectal adenoma have an increased risk of developing metachronous colorectal neoplasms. Accordingly, this subgroup of patients may benefit from specific surveillance strategies.

Low adherence to colonoscopy in the screening of first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is one of the methods of choice for screening relatives of patients with colorectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the rate of adherence to colonoscopy in first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer and describe the lesions found. METHODS: A prospective, cross-sectional, multicentre, nationwide study was conducted. The study population was composed of first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer selected randomly from the EPICOLON study. Seventy-four index patients were included. These had 342 living first-degree relatives (parents, siblings and children), of whom 281 were interviewed. RESULTS: The adherence rate was 38% (107/281). Adherence was greater in families with a higher degree of familial aggregation for colorectal cancer (88.9% for Amsterdam vs 33.3% for Bethesda and sporadic cancer; p<0.05), an index patient aged under 65 years (60% for patients <65 years vs 32.9% for patients >or=65 years; p<0.05) and an index patient who was female (46.2% for women vs 31% for men; p = 0.28). Adherence was also greater in relatives under 65 years (54% in patients <65 years vs 18% in patients >or=65 years; p = 0.05), in female relatives (49% in female relatives vs 27.3% in male relatives; p<0.05) and in siblings and children (40% in siblings and children vs 13% in parents; p<0.05). Lesions were found in 26% (28/107) of the study population. Nine (8.4%) individuals had a total of 18 advanced lesions. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that adherence to colonoscopy in our population of first-degree relatives was low. The adherence was more frequently associated with a higher degree of familial aggregation, a relative age of under 65 years, a sibling or offspring relationship, and female sex.

Association of the ARLTS1 Cys148Arg variant with sporadic and familial colorectal cancer.

ARLTS1 was recently identified in chromosome 13q14 as a tumor suppressor gene of the ADP-ribosylation factor family with pro-apoptotic characteristics. Additionally, one of its genetic variants (W149X) was hypothesized to be a polymorphism associated with familial cancer. We performed a large case-control association study within the EPICOLON project aimed at evaluating the sporadic and familial colorectal cancer (CRC) risk associated with ARLTS1 genetic variants. Whereas P131L and W149X did not seem to affect CRC risk, C148R did show, for the first time in CRC, statistically significant differences between cases and controls [odds ratio (OR) = 1.45, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.13-1.86, P = 0.003], sporadic cases and controls (OR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.13-2.23, P = 0.007) and familial cases and controls (OR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.10-2.19, P = 0.01) in agreement with a hypothetical moderate increase of the cancer risk linked to the C148R ARLTS1 variant, both in sporadic and familial CRC cases.

Identification of MYH mutation carriers in colorectal cancer: a multicenter, case-control, population-based study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Whereas it has conclusively been demonstrated that biallelic MutY human homolog (MYH) mutations confer a significant risk for colorectal cancer (CRC), the influence of monoallelic mutations remains controversial. Characterization of MYH-associated CRC is critical to identify individuals who might benefit from preventive strategies. This prospective, multicenter, case-control, population-based study was aimed at (1) establishing the CRC risk associated with specific germline MYH mutations and (2) devising a set of clinical criteria to identify MYH carriers among newly diagnosed CRC. METHODS: Genotyping for Y165C and G382D was performed by TaqMan technology. Single-stranded conformation polymorphism analysis was performed in heterozygotes to screen for mutations in the entire gene. All individuals were re-screened for any additional pathogenic variant. RESULTS: Biallelic and monoallelic MYH mutations were found in 8 (0.7%) and 19 (1.7%) of 1116 CRC patients, respectively. None of the 934 control subjects carried biallelic mutations, whereas 22 (2.3%) of them were monoallelic carriers. In a meta-analysis including all previous case-control studies, monoallelic MYH carriers were not at increased risk for CRC (odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-1.37), although a significant association was found with the Y165C mutation in either homozygotes or heterozygotes (odds ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.40). Furthermore, presence of more than 15 synchronous colorectal adenomas or CRC diagnosed before the age of 50 years was the most effective set of criteria for the identification of biallelic MYH mutation carriers. CONCLUSIONS: This study proposes the first set of clinical criteria designed to identify CRC patients with biallelic MYH mutations, and it argues against an increased risk for monoallelic carriers.

Performance of different microsatellite marker panels for detection of mismatch repair-deficient colorectal tumors.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal tumors caused by failure of the DNA mismatch repair system commonly show microsatellite instability. Our goals were to compare the performance of two panels of markers (a panel previously recommended by the National Cancer Institute [NCI] and a pentaplex of mononucleotide repeats) and to devise the simplest diagnostic strategy for identification of patients with colorectal cancer characterized by defects in mismatch repair. METHODS: We recruited 1058 patients who were newly diagnosed with colorectal cancer. DNA from fresh-frozen and paraffin-embedded tumors was tested for microsatellite instability, using the NCI-recommended panel of microsatellite markers and the pentaplex panel of mononucleotide repeats, respectively, as templates for polymerase chain reactions (PCRs). Microsatellite instability in fresh-frozen tumors was also assessed using the pentaplex panel of mononucleotides in a crossover analysis. The expression of mismatch repair proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) in the tumors was determined immunohistochemically. The sensitivity and specificity with which the marker panels identified tumors with deficiencies in the expression of mismatch repair proteins were calculated. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: The sensitivity and positive predictive value of the NCI panel were 76.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 61% to 92%) and 65.0% (95% CI = 49% to 81%), respectively; corresponding values for the mononucleotide pentaplex panel were 95.8% (95% CI = 89% to 103%) and 88.5% (95% CI = 79% to 98%), respectively. A panel consisting of the mononucleotide repeat markers BAT26 and NR24 alone had the same predictive value as the pentaplex panel of mononucleotide repeats. CONCLUSIONS: The pentaplex panel of mononucleotide repeats performs better than the NCI panel for the detection of mismatch repair-deficient tumors. Simultaneous assessment of the instability of BAT26 and NR24 is as effective as use of the pentaplex panel for diagnosing mismatch repair deficiency.

Cyclooxygenase 2 expression in colorectal cancer with DNA mismatch repair deficiency.

BACKGROUND: Cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) overexpression is a frequent but not universal event in colorectal cancer. It has been suggested that COX-2 protein expression is reduced in colorectal cancer with a defective mismatch repair (MMR) system, a phenomenon commonly associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) but also present in up to 15% of sporadic tumors. AIM: To assess COX-2 expression in a large series of fully characterized colorectal cancer patients with respect to the MMR system and to dissect the mechanisms responsible for altered COX-2 expression in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MMR-deficient colorectal cancer were identified in a nationwide, prospective, multicenter study (EPICOLON project). Control MMR-proficient colorectal cancer patients were randomly selected. COX-2 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Personal and familial characteristics, as well as MSH2/MLH1 expression and germ line mutations, were evaluated. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three patients, 46 with MMR deficiency and 107 with MMR proficiency, were included in the analysis. Overall, tumor COX-2 overexpression was observed in 107 patients (70%). COX-2 overexpression was observed in 85 patients (79%) with a MMR-proficient system, but only in 22 patients (48%) with a MMR-deficient colorectal cancer (P < 0.001). The lack of COX-2 overexpression was independently associated with a MMR-deficient system (odds ratio, 3.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.78-8.51; P = 0.001) and a poor degree of differentiation (OR, 3.83; 95% CI, 1.30-11.31; P = 0.015). In the subset of patients with a MMR-deficient colorectal cancer, lack of COX-2 overexpression correlated with a poor degree of differentiation, no fulfillment of Amsterdam II criteria, absence of MSH2/MLH1 germ line mutations, presence of tumor MSH2 expression, and lack of tumor MLH1 expression. CpG island promoter hypermethylation of COX2 was observed in 6 of 18 (33%) tumors lacking COX-2 expression in comparison with 2 of 28 (7%) tumors expressing this protein (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Up to half of MMR-deficient colorectal cancer do not show COX-2 overexpression, a fact observed almost exclusively in patients with sporadic forms. COX2 hypermethylation seems to be responsible for gene silencing in one third of them. These results suggest the potential utility of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in HNPCC chemoprevention and may explain the lack of response of this approach in some sporadic tumors.

Differential features of colorectal cancers fulfilling Amsterdam criteria without involvement of the mutator pathway.

PURPOSE: Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is the commonest form of inherited colorectal cancer. Whereas it has been known that mismatch repair gene mutations are the underlying cause of HNPCC, an undetermined number of patients do not have these alterations. The main objectives of this study were to assess the relevance of clinically defined HNPCC patients without characteristic mutator pathway alterations and to identify their specific features. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This was a prospective, population-based, cohort that included 1,309 newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients. Demographic, clinical, pathologic data and tumor DNA from probands as well as a detailed family history were collected. Microsatellite analysis and MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 immunohistochemistry were done. Germ line MLH1 and MSH2 mutational analysis was done in all patients with evidence of MMR alterations. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (1.9%) fulfilled Amsterdam criteria of HNPCC but 15 (60%) of them did not have microsatellite instability and showed normal expression of MMR proteins. These patients presented mostly left-sided tumors without lymphocytic infiltrate; they were older, had fewer family members affected with colorectal or endometrial cancers, and more often fulfilled Amsterdam II criteria than HNPCC patients with microsatellite instability. Like unstable HNPCC patients, this group without mutator pathway alterations had a significant percentage of synchronous and metachronous adenomatous polyps and cancers. CONCLUSIONS: We define an important group of HNPCC families with specific features, no evidence of mismatch repair deficiency, and an autosomal dominant trait with a lesser penetrance than HNPCC with deficiency.