Identifying and managing CAR T-cell-mediated toxicities: on behalf of an Italian CAR-T multidisciplinary team.

INTRODUCTION: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapy is a new treatment for patients with hematologic malignancies in which other therapies have failed. AREAS COVERED: The review provides an overview for recognizing and managing the most acute toxicities related to CAR-T cells. EXPERT OPINION: The development of immune-mediated toxicities is a common challenge of CAR-T therapy. The mechanism that determines this toxicity is still unclear, although an unfavorable tumor microenvironment and a pro-inflammatory state put patients at risk. The monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment of post-CAR-T toxicities must be determined and based on international guidelines and internal clinical practice. It is urgent to identify biomarkers that can identify patients at greater risk of developing complications. The adoption of consistent grading criteria is necessary to improve toxicity management strategies continually. The first-line therapy consists of supportive care and treatment with tocilizumab or corticosteroids. An early start of cytokine blockade therapies could mitigate toxicity. The plan will include cytokine release prophylaxis, a risk-adapted treatment, prevention of on-target/off-tumor effect, and a switch on/off CAR-T approach.

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: An Activity-based Costing Analysis, Comparing a Total Inpatient Model Versus an Early Discharge Model.

BACKGROUND: Activity-based costing (ABC) was developed and advocated as a means of overcoming the systematic distortions of traditional cost accounting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We calculated the cost of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with multiple myeloma using the ABC method, through 2 different care models: the total inpatient model (TIM) and the early-discharge outpatient model (EDOM) and compared this with the approved diagnosis related-groups (DRG) Italian tariffs. RESULTS: The TIM and EDOM models involved a total cost of €28,615.15 and €16,499.43, respectively. In the TIM model, the phase with the greatest economic impact was the posttransplant (recovery and hematologic engraftment) with 36.4% of the total cost, whereas in the EDOM model, the phase with the greatest economic impact was the pretransplant (chemo-mobilization, apheresis procedure, cryopreservation, and storage) phase, with 60.4% of total expenses. In an analysis of each episode, the TIM model comprised a higher absorption than the EDOM. In particular, the posttransplant represented 36.4% of the total costs in the TIM and 17.7% in EDOM model, respectively. The estimated reduction in cost per patient using an EDOM model was over €12,115.72. The repayment of the DRG in Calabrian Region for the ASCT procedure is €59,806. Given the real cost of the transplant, the estimated cost saving per patient is €31,190.85 in the TIM model and €43,306.57 in the EDOM model. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the actual repayment of the DRG does not correspond to the real cost of the ASCT procedure in Italy. Moreover, using the EDOM, the cost of ASCT is approximately the half of the TIM model.

Basal CD34+ Cell Count Predicts Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization in Healthy Donors after Administration of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor: A Longitudinal, Prospective, Observational, Single-Center, Cohort Study.

A longitudinal, prospective, observational, single-center, cohort study on healthy donors (HDs) was designed to identify predictors of CD34+ cells on day 5 with emphasis on the predictive value of the basal CD34+ cell count. As potential predictors of mobilization, age, sex, body weight, height, blood volume as well as white blood cell count, peripheral blood (PB) mononuclear cells, platelet count, hematocrit, and hemoglobin levels were considered. Two different evaluations of CD34+ cell counts were determined for each donor: baseline (before granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF] administration) and in PB after G-CSF administration on the morning of the fifth day (day 5). A total of 128 consecutive HDs (66 males) with a median age of 43 years were enrolled. CD34+ levels on day 5 displayed a non-normal distribution, with a median value of 75.5 cells/µL. To account for the non-normal distribution of the dependent variable, a quantile regression analysis to predict CD34+ on day 5 using the baseline value of CD34+ as the key predictor was performed. On crude analysis, a baseline value of CD34+ ranging from .5 cells/µL to 1 cells/µL predicts a median value of 50 cells/µL on day 5; a value of 2 cells/µL predicts a median value of 70.7 cells/µL; a value of 3 cells/µL to 4 cells/µL predicts a median value of 91.3 cells/µL, and a value ≥ 5 predicts a median value of 112 cells/µL. In conclusion, the baseline PB CD34+ cell count correlates with the effectiveness of allogeneic PB stem cell mobilization and could be useful to plan the collection.

Mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor stem cells in allogeneic setting with lenograstim by subcutaneous injection, in daily or twice-daily dosing: a single-center prospective study with historical control.

BACKGROUND: Although the mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor stem cells from healthy donors (HDs) using granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor is widely used, the ideal method for the administration of the cytokine has not yet been determined. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Seventy-five consecutive HDs received lenograstim (LENO) as mobilization agent. LENO was given subcutaneously at a dose of 10 µg/kg in a once-daily dose (ODD) every 24 hours. Results were compared with a historical control group of 181 HDs treated with 5 µg/kg LENO twice-daily dose (TDD) with a time interval of 12 hours. RESULTS: CD34+ cell concentrations evaluated on Day 4 and on Day 5 were 45 × 10(6) (range, 6 × 10(6) -217 × 10(6) )/L and 75 × 10(6) (range, 7 × 10(6) -279 × 10(6) )/L with ODD versus 36 × 10(6) (range, 3 × 10(6) -200 × 10(6) )/L and 55 × 10(6) (range, 3 × 10(6) -738 × 10(6) )/L with TDD (p = 0.067 and p = 0.001). The collected CD34+ cell counts in first apheresis procedure were 5.6 × 10(6) ± 2.9 × 10(6) and 5.7 × 10(6) ± 3 × 10(6) /kg donor and recipient body weight in the ODD versus 5.4 × 10(6) ± 3.8 × 10(6) and 5.3 × 10(6) ± 3.5 × 10(6) /kg in the TDD cohort, respectively (p = 0.08 and p = 0.02). Five HDs (6.7%) mobilized CD34+ cells of fewer than 2 × 10(6) /kg recipient body weight in the ODD group compared with seven HDs (3.9%) in the TDD group (p = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily administration of LENO is at least as effective as twice-daily administration for the mobilization of CD34+ cells in HDs.

Tolerability and efficacy of busulfan and fludarabine as allogeneic pretransplant conditioning therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: comparison with busulfan and cyclophosphamide regimen.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare safety and efficacy of the association of busulfan with cyclophosphamide (BuCy2) versus busulfan and fludarabine (BuFlu) as a conditioning regimen in allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation (allo-HPCT) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 65 consecutive patients who received an allo-HPCT from Human Leucocyte Antigen-matched sibling donors were analyzed. The conditioning was BuCy2 in 48 patients and BuFlu in 17 patients. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the 2 cohorts in hematological engraftment, incidence of extrahematological toxicities, and acute graft versus host disease (GVHD). The incidence of chronic GVHD was 34% in the BuCy2 group versus 57% in the BuFlu group (P = .03). Transplant-related mortality was 17% (8 patients) in the BuCy2 group versus 0 in the BuFlu arm. Disease-related mortality was similar in the whole study population; in high-risk AML patients it was 11% in the BuCy2 group and 19% in the BuFlu group (P = .015). The probability of disease-free and event-free survival at 2 years was, respectively, 70% and 60% in the BuCy2 group and 59% and 58% in the BuFlu group (P = .06 and P = not significant [ns]). The probability of overall survival at 2 years was 71% in the BuCy2 group and 63% in the BuFlu group (P = ns), and in the high-risk group it was 83% and 67% in the BuCy2 and BuFlu group, respectively (P = ns). CONCLUSION: BuFlu is well tolerated and is less toxic than BuCy2 and our results did not suggest that in high-risk AML, BuCy2 should be the favorite regimen in terms of efficacy.

Predictive factors that affect the mobilization of CD34(+) cells in healthy donors treated with recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF).

No specific characteristics have been identified as predictors of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) mobilization in healthy donors. In this study, clinical characteristics and laboratory data for 122 healthy donors who underwent apheresis on day 5 of treatment with recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) were retrospectively analyzed for correlations with CD34(+) cell mobilization. The variables that were analyzed included age, sex, body weight, basal complete blood count, and maximum white blood count (WBC) before apheresis, G-CSF type, and dosage. Median age and body weight were 42.5 years (range 16-65) and 72.5 kg (range 47-121), respectively. By univariate analysis, male sex (P = 0.007), body weight (< or = 70 vs. >70 kg, P = 0.04), and donor's age (< or = 50 vs. > 50 years; P = 0.015) were correlated with the number of CD34(+) cells mobilized. By multivariate analysis, donor's age and male sex were the only two variables that significantly predicted a high CD34(+) cell level. In conclusion, our data suggest that male sex and younger age are the only factors that significantly affect CD34(+) mobilization in healthy donors.

Harvesting peripheral blood progenitor cells from healthy donors: retrospective comparison of filgrastim and lenograstim.

Mobilization of CD34+ into peripheral blood is attained by either glycosylated (lenograstim) or non-glycosylated recombinant G-CSF (filgrastim). 101 donors, 57 males, median age 42 years (range 16-63) entered this retrospective study. Group I (55 cases) received filgrastim and group II lenograstim subcutaneously for 5-6 days. The peak number of CD34+ cells/microl blood observed on day 4 and 5 was not significantly different in the two groups. No differences were shown in terms of both circulating CFU-GM at the time of harvesting and CD34+ target of collection. The most frequent side effects were bone pain (18.2% grade I; 36.4% grade II, 7.3% grade III), headache (18.2%), nausea (9.1%), fever (5.5%) and a mild splenomegaly (> 2 cm) (5.5%) in filgrastim group, and bone pain (37.0% grade I, 26.1% grade II, 2.2% grade III), headache (17.4%), nausea (15.2%), fever (4.4%) and a mild splenomegaly (4.3%) in lenograstim group, respectively. CD34+ collection was associated with thrombocytopenia, which was not significantly different between the two groups. No donor in either group developed long-term adverse effects. We conclude that both G-CSFs are comparable in terms of CD34+ cell collection, safety and tolerability.

High-dose chemotherapy with mitoxantrone + melphalan and autologous stem cell rescue in metastatic breast cancer patients: a study of feasibility and tolerability.

Hematological and extra-hematological toxicity of mitoxantrone-containing regimens with autologous stem cell rescue was evaluated in 32 metastatic breast cancer patients. The schedule was the final part of two high-dose chemotherapy programs, including an induction phase with three courses of conventional chemotherapy with epirubicin (120 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) plus three courses of docetaxel (100 mg/m2) and a first high-dose chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide (6000 mg/m2), thiotepa (500 mg/m2) and carboplatin (800 mg/m2) or melphalan (160 mg/m2) plus thiotepa (600 mg/m2). The final second autograft phase included mitoxantrone (60 mg/m2) associated with melphalan (160 mg/m2) and autologous stem cell rescue infusion. The median duration of severe neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was 9 (range, 7-13) and 11.5 (range, 9-29) days. The median number of units of erythrocytes and platelets transfused was 1 (0-11) and 4 (1-9), respectively. Fever for a median of 2 (0-8) days developed in 71.8% of the patients. Mucositis was observed in 81.2% (WHO grade 3-4 in 25%). No acute or late cardiac toxicity was observed. One patient died because of a transplant-unrelated cause. The response according to the program phase showed an increased rate of complete response, from 12.5% at the end of conventional chemotherapy to 21.9% after the first high-dose chemotherapy course, to increase to 43.9% after the treatment with mitoxantrone-melphalan. We conclude that a conditioning regimen with high dose mitoxantrone-melphalan fits well within the high-dose chemotherapy program.