Amniocentesis learning: Use of a home-made simulator.

BACKGROUND: Amniocentesis is the most performed invasive prenatal diagnostic procedure. Learning the procedure is difficult for the learner, the teacher and the patient because of the risks inherent to this technique and the anxiety generated by the procedure. The objective of this work was to evaluate a theoretical and practical amniocentesis training workshop using a simulator. METHODS: We were inspired by Pierre Jean's precepts for the planning of a medical training. We then carried out the pedagogical session with the gynecology residents of our Regional University Hospital, a type 3 maternity hospital in France. We evaluated the theoretical learning through a questionnaire before and after the training and then the practical session on a home-made simulator. The satisfaction of the participants was assessed by a questionnaire at the end of the session. RESULTS: Fifteen learners, from the first to the last semester of internship, participated in the training. The median score of the pre-training questionnaire ("pre-test" questionnaire) was 3.3 out of 10 (min = 1, max = 6) and that of the post-training questionnaire ("post-test" questionnaire) was 7.9 out of 10 (min = 6, max = 9). The post-training scores were significantly higher (p < 0.0007). The average score for the practical training was 30.5 out of 40 (24-36). 93 % of the learners were fully satisfied with the theoretical training and 100 % stated that they had improved their technical skills. CONCLUSION: The residents in our department expressed a need for training in this invasive procedure of antenatal diagnosis. The training proved to be beneficial following the evaluation of the learning but also following the feedback of the learners.

Parental presence during painful or invasive procedures in neonatology: A survey of healthcare professionals.

BACKGROUND: Newborns in neonatology are exposed to invasive and painful procedures. The absence of parents during procedures revealed significantly high pain scores. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess practices regarding the role of parents during painful and invasive procedures. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational, multicenter study in France in which 471 caregivers participated. Professional practices regarding the role of parents during painful procedures on their child were assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with parental presence during painful procedures. RESULTS: Parental presence was most often allowed during capillary blood sampling, nasogastric tube insertions, and vein punctures, whereas it was mostly restricted during central line insertions, extubations, lumbar punctures, and intubations. However, we found discrepancies depending on the type of facility and caregiver seniority. CONCLUSION: An important variability in practices concerning the role of parents during painful and invasive procedures on their child was reported.